DUDE Ken! Why do you feel it's ok to come call us out in front of everyone by saying that you have no say in decisions?
The fact of the matter is; YOU ARE THE ONLY REASON manacloud wasn't dropped to 7/8. So i guess that means you always get over ruled and no one listens to what you say, right?
Please dude, we comprimise, we don't over rule. You just didn't like the comprimising. Stop acting like a victim.
So, as for ROFL, He obviously deserves top 20, he obviously will be top 20 next list. As for this list, we stopped counting new tournaments after best of 2006. Why? Because this list takes a lot to create, and if we keep adding new tournaments, we will keep having to start over. And at the time ROFL only had 1 tournament under his belt, best of 06. While his performance was incredibly impressive, we felt that one tournament just barely missed the cut of being enough to boost him past people with literally years of history under their belts. It's always good to see more than 1 tourney's results to make sure that the player's performance wasn't a fluke. In new events, ROFL has had more than 1 impressive tourney under his belt, and there is no doubt that he will enter the next list in good fashion. We just couldn't include those at this time.
Aesis, you have history on your side which is why you haven't dropped far below your crew members. Changes can come, but they will come gradually.
Rome dropped one spot only becuase he we inactive for a whole period so we couldn't assume that he deserved a bump to top 10, but we also COULD assume that he was better than 15-20, because he *****, and you just don't lose skill like that out of nowhere.
THE FOLLOWING IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING TO UNDERSTAND:
Now, Let's discuss BOA/DC. The nature of these lists are CUMULATIVE. The fact is, we move people up or down based on their old placings. This automatically means we include old results even if we don't discuss them. Because the lists are cumulative, you have to realize that we consider a player's history, and BOA/DC do NOT have amazing histories. So what this does is it moves these players up GRADUALLY as opposed to having them move up a ridiculous amount of spots. And even then, boa moved in at 15 which is huge for being below 25 before this list. Same with DC.
Now, why is it better to move people up Gradually as opposed to just drastically moving them around based on current trends? Simple, you have to ask yourself a question:
If you are OK with BOA moving into the top 10 based on his current record...
are you OK with Ken moving down below top 10 if he starts ****ing up during a certain period?
"But Hugo, ken has such a good history that it wouldn't be right to drop him below 10th even if he starts ****ing up"
EXACTLY!
Just as it wouldn't be right to skyrocket a player with awful history just because he's been performing well as of late.
It's generally the same concept when moving players up or down. History comes into play in both ways. And using a player's history is the best way to do it.
