Except that Snake still has disadvantaged matchups to get to that point, while MK just has a series of at worst 50:50 matches.
Nothing has changed from this.
A lot of good disadvantageous matchups do at top levels of play, Lain couldn't even take one match from Ally as DDD (all 3). If anything, the disadvantages are much more notable at lower levels of play... The tougher the competition, the harder it is to exploit those weaknesses.
In other words... SO what if Snake has disadvantages? It's been proven time and again those disadvantages can be overcome at the top levels of play! Snake has beaten DDD too many times, same as IC's have beaten MKs, Falcos have beaten Marths, etc etc etc... Mention any low level matches in which these events have happened, and you'll find out that the smarter the player, the smarter the decisions... Therefore, the better performance by the disadvantaged character, POSSIBLY leading into victory.
Still though, the stress on me would be gigantic, and would distract me from the match. Its like an olympic runner who hears that if he wins he'll get shot at the end.
He is still going to try to win, but **** will he be distracted.
Good point. Still, I think that example is too intense... I'd say "To hell with this race! I won't even have a life to spend the money with!". However, I understand what you mean.
Maybe not DISTRACTED by that fact, more like... Purposefully going to end up 2nd or 3rd in order to avoid being shot, yet doing good overall.