Hamek
Smash Rookie
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
- Messages
- 8
That argument would hold water had unknown not explicitly stated he couldn't hear what Inui was saying, how can it be assault if he doesn't know what he's saying (of course, I haven't heard what he said, I'm going off of unknown's post, I'm also unsure of the letter of the law, but I don't think having a debate on that would be all that fruitful). Also since I'm unsure of what Inui actually said, if he was just cheering (which iirc is what he said he was doing, and Unknown didn't say that Inui wasn't), that wouldn't really be verbal assault. I also don't see how it could be harassment for yelling too loudly at a loud event.Not defending or justifying Unknown's actions at all here but why is everyone apparently forgetting that verbal assault / harassment / etc. are also against the law? I know someone who won a harassment lawsuit for a lot less than someone yelling in his ear, continually smack-talking said person after repeated requests to stop, and planning to provoke said person into violence again.
I don't know either of these guys, not trying to take sides at all, but there've been a bunch of posts that basically amounted to, "Yeah Inui's a **** but Unknown BROKE THE LAW," and... well, technically Inui could also be argued to have done so.
Real talk though this is like a Judge Judy ep
I've also seen many more post saying something along the posts of "who cares, it's inui" (You don't seem to be saying that but I didn't say that Inui was being a ****), and my post was mainly directed at those people.