Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
1 dude doing well once or twice means nothing. let it be consistent and then we can talk. typical anti-ban mk user defending mk.Anti just 2-0'd dabuz and is in winners finals of another mk banned tournament.
Man, banning mk sure showed those no skill mk mains that they rely on their "broken" character to win.
Oh wait, maybe they're just actually good at the game.
Yes because i definitely said on any level.......anti literally the only MK that knows MUs on any level
-dead-
No it only seems more campy immediately because it just so happens that every character in the game that does well vs MK is very campy (cause your not allowed to actually fight MK you avoid him and hit him while he chases). See we have never even remotely given the metagame a chance to change with him gone. So we don't really know.Brawl without mk makes the came even more campy and boring. If the game is dying with him, it'd surely die faster without him.
Regardless, no one is saying MK doesn't take skill. The idea is that eventually he's what everyone turns to and overcentralizes the game. Our entire rule set and tier list revolves around MK and the MK match up. 4 people out of 8 at this tournament used MK. A lot of MKs even took each other out due to the ditto! No one is saying MK players will be bad without MK (except Xyro), we are saying that MK is way over used and in every situation is the ultimate example. The only reason other players have switched off MK and found success is due to the other player having MU inexperience (IE Lee Martin going Lucario Vs Rain).
I'm reposting this since you seemed to have completely evaded this statementAnti just 2-0'd dabuz and is in winners finals of another mk banned tournament.
Man, banning mk sure showed those no skill mk mains that they rely on their "broken" character to win.
Oh wait, maybe they're just actually good at the game.
No, I was just going to stop posting on the subject. I'll pm you my reply.I'm reposting this since you seemed to have completely evaded this statement
I was being facetious and shouldn't have.If you were going to stop posting on the subject why did you say the exact opposite thing of what I said AFTER I said it? You were still posting on the subject in the thread.
http://web.as.uky.edu/statistics/users/viele/sta200f98/simpsons/simpsons.htmlStatistics are bad unless very similar tournaments are used (about the same money and entrants).
Simpson's Paradox <- that's all I need to say
You sure are facetious in an incredibly predictable and consistent manner in terms of time, place, subject, and delivery.I was being facetious and shouldn't have.
I knew it was only a matter of time. I actually told my buddy that within 2 pages someone would state that. It's always been anti-bans last line of defense. "Guys lets just stop talking about it for real >:|"why isn't this thread locked... lmao even the admins and mods are being ********.
Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.MK didn't dominate this at all though. Half of top 8 may be MK but at least to me that is perfectly fine. The Olimars did bad this one time, otherwise there could have been even less MKs.
You're still salty about that time I made you modkill yourself and then won the game for town anyway. :BOverswarm is the kind of cancer that needs to be removed or isolated from this community for the rest of its existence.
![]()
I wont' lie: I read "bed soilers" as bed sores.Oh stop it. At least the man gives a respectable effort towards any debate and isn't one of the many pedophiles, proven thieves, bed soilers, housing destroyers, and so on that reside and are still accepted in or around this community.
But two of the three "best" players in Japan didn't make top 8. The one that did plays MK the 2 that didn't dont. I have heard from everyone ever that 9b and nietono are far and away the best in Japan. (it was when people were arguing that Japan was way better when Brood beat M2K and people were saying "Brood is not even the best player in Japan and he beat us, imagine if they sent someone good" and I was like "they did his name is Rain and he got 8th losing to Lee Martin and hes considered arguably the best in Japan" and they said "No 9B and Nietono are unquestionably the best" and then they said that Japan has just gotten to a level we haven't where MK does not dominate anymore and that we should unban him and improve) is actually what happened. Oh and go figure turns out Rain WAS really amazing.MK didn't dominate this at all though. Half of top 8 may be MK but at least to me that is perfectly fine. The Olimars did bad this one time, otherwise there could have been even less MKs.
This I never understood. Why would we even care? If the Japanese started playing with items, would we switch to accommodate them?Honestly, I feel like this is the biggest question in the ban debate, currently: Are we (The US) willing to sacrifice international attendance (Namely, the Japanese) at the big US tourneys (like APEX) for a more character-diverse metagame?
Both factors are really powerful motivators.
They would never start playing with items. (As Main Event)This I never understood. Why would we even care? If the Japanese started playing with items, would we switch to accommodate them?
No.you missed the point.