except theres no such thing as being "due" for anything.
no there is not, but statistics can provide evidence that may "suggest" as much.
a team with 2 straight loses then a win is WAY more common than a team with 11 wins then a win.
Given that the following is less complex the main principle stands:
a coin flip is roughly 50/50 and independent of previous action right?( Ideally one could flip it and get tails 100 times in a row cuz the events are disjoint right? The event of getting tails 100 times in a row however is unrealistic and I would bet all the money in the world that if you come to me at pound and flip a coin 100 times that we will not see tails 100 times in a row. If the latter is disjoint why am I so compelled to put so much money on it? If the events are TRULY disjoint how can i determine that ABSOULTELY NO ONE WILL SRSLY TAKE ME UP ON THAT BET AT POUND before I even present the challenge. Why are the odds for teams winning playoff series from being down 0-3 so much lower than that of teams being up 2-1?. The direct statistic can reflect a 50/50 on a coin flip all it wants, but theres no doubt in my mind that the odds of getting heads 100 times in a row and the odds of getting 5 heads in a row are similar. The events arent joint but they arent completely disjoint...indirectly joint perhaps?
with that said:
20 dollar coin flip money match 4-1 odds (you put up 5 and I'll put up 20.)
If you flip a coin in my presence 100 times and I see tails each one of those 100 times, you win. if heads comes up within any of those 100 tosses you lose.