I'd like to play as Baby Mario, but I don't see it happening.Does any one think that yoish should get reps in the next game?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'd like to play as Baby Mario, but I don't see it happening.Does any one think that yoish should get reps in the next game?
Sure, there are a bunch more than you'd think. Birdo, Bowser Junior. Hell, any character from the Yoshi series could be given a moveset.Does any one think that yoish should get reps in the next game?
Birdo and Bowser Jr. are both Mario characters. Baby Bowser is from Yoshi's Island, and Birdo has never appeared in any Yoshi game.Sure, there are a bunch more than you'd think. Birdo, Bowser Junior. Hell, any character from the Yoshi series could be given a moveset.
i don't use PT in brawl at all, but i love the idea.Idk about you guys but If we had to take a character out of brawls roster who wouldn't be in ssb4 I vote on PT. XD
Hence why I said, "Imagine" you dumb sack of ****.The problem is that you can't satifsy everyone in terms of characters...
I would prefer it this way. More characters=more fun.... without turning Smash Bros. into DBZ fighting game.
.
If people like a series, they'll suggest characters. And what does it matter? It's not like they have the power anyway.Another thing I don't get is the people that suggest bizarre or obscure third-party characters for Smash Bros. such as Phoenix Wright.
worst logic ever. lolI would prefer it this way. More characters=more fun.
So having a different opinion warrants you insulting me.Hence why I said, "Imagine" you dumb sack of ****.
I would prefer it this way. More characters=more fun.
If people like a series, they'll suggest characters. And what does it matter? It's not like they have the power anyway.
I agree with Wolf on this, especially on the skull kid one.Most of the characters you/we suggest for SSB4 would make great Assist Trophies.
it was cool when he had a djc.Needs moar character balancing.
Yoshi, for example, needs a real 3rd jump and a normal shield. Complete with Yoshi bomb out of it, and a quick exit animation.
No, K. Rool, Black Shadow, Samurai Goroh, Ridley, and Krystal are all popular characters round here, but it should be the Pokemon that you should be worried about breaking into double digits.I'm confused. People do realise it's called Super Smash Bros not Super Mario Bros right?
I mean I pay no attention to Nintendo save this game and even then I'm only a little into it. But they must be solid in other places then Mario characters right? They must have a whole host of other good characters? Right? Right?????
Please tell me it's only a case of people suggesting almost nothing but Mario Characters (And mostly clones at that Baby Mario, Luigi, AND Bowser? *SNORE*) because they're small minded and have no imagination...
Or does every good Nintendo game or series of games ALREADY have a character or several in Smash? Because that's seriously depressing to think.
At the very least if they have no games left to tap into I'd much rather see 1 character each from the series that only have 1 or 2 characters in it then see Mario and Friends break Double Digits.
it's a good thing no body suggesting those characters anymore they got slightly annoying BUT WHY DOES EVERYONE THINK BOWSER JR.'S GOING TO BE A CLONENo, K. Rool, Black Shadow, Samurai Goroh, Ridley, and Krystal are all popular characters round here, but it should be the Pokemon that you should be worried about breaking into double digits.
They can always make a generic Magikoopa an Assist Trophy. The only spot that most generic enemies will be placed is likely to be either an Assist Trophy and/or an Adventure Mode enemy.
:/Skull Kid should be his own character because, let's face it, it would be cooler that having two Links.
I can't particularly agree with you. While it's not definite that Skull Kid would ever return with a prominent role in the series, he has made on-and-off appearances since ALttP (even though no one really recognized him until OoT), placing him three games ahead of MM, in which Tingle coincidentally debuted. If Skull Kid returns with a prominent role in a future Zelda game, I can almost assure you a spot for him on the roster.:/
Skull Kid is a character that only showed any sort of real importance in MM and is largely irrelevant today. He'll be even more obscure in 6 years time.
Also, Tingle > Skull Kid.
Well, considering that Sakurai lives and works there, and Japan's not that big of a place...I'd say it was out of convenience.So then why would he make a poll in japan?
People will want who they want, regardless of how crazy it might sound...though Smash has been a bit unpredictable as of late. There's no right or wrong way to wish for Smash Bros.Another thing I don't get is the people that suggest bizarre or obscure third-party characters for Smash Bros. such as Phoenix Wright.
Haha true this.People will want who they want, regardless of how crazy it might sound...though Smash has been a bit unpredictable as of late. There's no right or wrong way to wish for Smash Bros.
tru dat, blud. LOLI would say Epona would be a stage background than an Assist Trophy.
I agree. Skull kid would be a great addition. As long as Zelda wii doesn't introduce anyone hugely important or a character that would be able to fit in (The main reason I think wolf link+midna or Midna alone wasn't added) then Skull kid should be able to get in.I can't particularly agree with you. While it's not definite that Skull Kid would ever return with a prominent role in the series, he has made on-and-off appearances since ALttP (even though no one really recognized him until OoT), placing him three games ahead of MM, in which Tingle coincidentally debuted. If Skull Kid returns with a prominent role in a future Zelda game, I can almost assure you a spot for him on the roster.
After all, he was in the last console Zelda, and played quite an important (albeit small) role in the game. Link would not have obtained the Master Sword without him. Now doesn't that say a lot? Of course, you can argue that without Tingle, Link would not have assemble the Triforce of Courage (or Wisdom, can't remember) in WW, so essentially at this point in time, I hold them in equal regards, despite my preference for Skully over Tingle.
However, if you take into account Purlo from TP, to be the realistic rendition of Tingle, then you would have to compare his importance in TP to Skull Kid's, and that easily bumps Skully's a level above Tingle's, and seeing as how neither of them were present in PH, Skull Kid obviously prevails at this time.
Skull Kid is basically Zelda's Wario, a sort of anti-hero. Tingle can be seen as Zelda's Toad, a loopy little helper. Who got a spot in Brawl?
Of course, if a new, important character is introduced in Zelda Wii, expect them to get priority over anyone else. That is, of course, if Sakurai doesn't like the idea of a new Zelda rep, but rather replacing Toon Link with another Link, as Toonboy replaced Young Link.
What? *shakes headI can't particularly agree with you. While it's not definite that Skull Kid would ever return with a prominent role in the series, he has made on-and-off appearances since ALttP (even though no one really recognized him until OoT), placing him three games ahead of MM, in which Tingle coincidentally debuted. If Skull Kid returns with a prominent role in a future Zelda game, I can almost assure you a spot for him on the roster.
After all, he was in the last console Zelda, and played quite an important (albeit small) role in the game. Link would not have obtained the Master Sword without him. Now doesn't that say a lot? Of course, you can argue that without Tingle, Link would not have assemble the Triforce of Courage (or Wisdom, can't remember) in WW, so essentially at this point in time, I hold them in equal regards, despite my preference for Skully over Tingle.
However, if you take into account Purlo from TP, to be the realistic rendition of Tingle, then you would have to compare his importance in TP to Skull Kid's, and that easily bumps Skully's a level above Tingle's, and seeing as how neither of them were present in PH, Skull Kid obviously prevails at this time.
Skull Kid is basically Zelda's Wario, a sort of anti-hero. Tingle can be seen as Zelda's Toad, a loopy little helper. Who got a spot in Brawl?
Of course, if a new, important character is introduced in Zelda Wii, expect them to get priority over anyone else. That is, of course, if Sakurai doesn't like the idea of a new Zelda rep, but rather replacing Toon Link with another Link, as Toonboy replaced Young Link.
In Ocarina of Time he was a side quest character, but in Twilight Princess he helped get the Master Sword. And I think you're letting your love for a fat middle-aged man in green spandex cloud YOUR judgement.What? *shakes head
First off, if there is a secondary antagonist to the Zelda series, its Vaati. Secondly, if there is an anti-Link it is most definitely Tingle. Tingle is in his late 30's, Link is in his teens. Tingle is cowardly, Link is brave. Tingle waits for people to meet him, Link searches out over people. Tingle is weak and relies on other people to fight for him, Link is pretty much mostly by himself. Tingle IS the anti-Link. Also, if you actually think the Skull Kid (the Majora's Mask one) is more important than Tingle, please keep in mind that Tingle has a already had two games to date.
Also, Skull Kid has made as many appearances in Zelda games as Anju and Dampe have, and each game they have been in there has been a sidequest revolving around them. Are they important? Skull Kid was merely a side-character in Ocarina of Time and Twilight Princess. The only game he was an important character in was Majora's Mask. Please don't let fanboyism cloud your analysis. Skull Kid (Majora's Mask) is more suited to be an Assist Trophy than a full-character.
*facepalmIn Ocarina of Time he was a side quest character, but in Twilight Princess he helped get the Master Sword. And I think you're letting your love for a fat middle-aged man in green spandex cloud YOUR judgement.
It had to be done, always has to be done when people say loving Tingle is okay and loving Skull Kid is worthless fanboyism. ^^*facepalm
I don't like Tingle at all, but you have to realize that Tingle is a more re-occurring character than Skull Kid. In Wind Waker, he is pretty much needed to complete the game, and in Majora's Mask you need him for any maps at all of the overworld and the surrounding areas. Tingle also is constantly stalking you throughout Four Swords Adventures. In Minish Cap, he is simply a sidequest character and can be avoided entirely. I am not sure about the role Tingle played in Oracle of Seasons though. Also, keep in mind that Tingle has been the main hero of two games. How many secondary Zelda characters can claim that?
Games each character has appeared in:It had to be done, always has to be done when people say loving Tingle is okay and loving Skull Kid is worthless fanboyism. ^^
Also, Tingle is not more recurring. At the worst I would say they've APPEARED in about the same number of games, EXCLUDING the rupee land game.
I don't know where you got TWO games from.
Never heard of the last one, Rupeeland was japan only and looked horrible, and also was out of LoZ format horribly.Games each character has appeared in:
Skull Kid:
Ocarina of Time <-- A few very short side quests, as well as the mask quest.
Majora's Mask <-- Main antagonist.
Twilight Princess <-- Guided Link to the Master Sword and Temple of Time. Necessary and somewhat important.
Tingle:
Majora's Mask <---Sold maps. Not necessary.
Oracle of Seasons <---Sold an ocean map, optional, but recommended.
Wind Waker <---Tingle Tuner, unecessary.
Four Swords Adventures <---Tried to steal force gems. Uhhm...how is that major? It sounds like Takurri...almost.
Minish Cap...Optional, Kinstones.