the fact that you just identified two mango set losses more than a year apart demonstrates how clearly dominant he is
at pound3, he lost to silent wolf in link dittos or something ridiculous like that. The obscene path he took after that to get to 1st place should truly answer whether that set carried any meaning
at scsa, he lost to fly amanita. he was playing barlw, got careless, and got wobbled. Regardless, that's all legit, but it was also legit that he got back into grand finals and took it 6-0
last week, he lost to SS, but once again, came back and 6-0 in grand finals
don't mess with mr. try hard
if his falco beats the most people (not that it necessarily does, just pointing out this is a stupid point to be making), why wouldn't it be considered the best? Fact of the matter is, when m2k was in his prime, he was probably best in the world with at least 2/3 of the cast, and there's no reason mango can't be the same just because random smashboarders don't want to see their heroes relegated to second best
and the fact that you're looking for a single video to impress you and convince you that he's the best is evidence enough that you probably don't know what you're talking about
it seems like by your standards, the best player in the world isn't allowed to be the best player with any specific character, since it's just "him being amazing" instead of "him being amazing with the character"
there's no national PR because there's no samples to take from. Back in the day, the coasts probably played like twice a year, and if you wanted to base rankings off of their interaction, you could just look at the results directly.