Esotera
Smash Apprentice
Sorry to distract you man, I've got finals to do as well. I'll PM you.
/threadbackontrack
/threadbackontrack
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think its fine for a first run, and decent enough for top tiers and those who are capable of placing in money. The methods can be improved, but sometimes you have to start somewhere. However its a smart idea to have something to account for characters with a larger base of players.I don't want to be one of those people who complains about the service the BBR is providing, but it is pretty silly that people who have never even played the game before could potentially damage a char's tier placement. It definitely contradicts the idea that the list only concerns high level play.
That is probably the most player based way of determining tier placement.
Frame data etc. is definitely the most char based.
I agree with this 100%. You have to remember, Mew2King, when you're on the top of the world, and you become the face of the Smash community, everyone's going to want to dethrone you in some way, and goodness knows it wouldn't be surprising if those you have lost to defeated you by studying your play habits via Youtube videos. Also, with you winning everything, and having your name everywhere, people will eventually grow tired of you. Kind of reminds me of John Cena in the WWE, the poor guy, but I digress.Please stop blaming the community. You think anyone outside the Miami wants Lebron or the Heat to win? Or the Patriots outside NE? Being on top means you have a massive target on your back and that's true for just about anything that has hints of being competitive. If "things like that make it hard for you to really really want to win" then what youre really telling us is that you dont really want to be the best, because these are attributes that go hand in hand. Also what Eddie G said definitely made your situation worse..
And yeah, having motivation after being on top for so long is hard. This isnt particularly anyones fault, but its nothing new either. If new people arent rising up to challenge established top level players then theyre going to get burnt out. I think Apex gave some new life to the game because people realized theres still more to prove.
U can say that all u want. But that is selfish thinking. That overall isn't healthy for the community. I give props to m2k because sometimes he doesn't play super "gay" for that simple fact. Not much we can do tho because that is how brawl singles is...oh wait Japan doesn't play that way do they (not sarcasm)?That's actually the reason some characters (Meta Knight included) are high tier; because they can play "gay". Just because it's frowned upon doesn't mean it's illegal in competitive play. If it's there to be used, then use it for everything it's worth. Will it win you fans? Probably not. But at the end of the day, assuming one wins using "gay" tactics, whose pockets will be filling with cash prizes?
I know it's selfish thinking. I never did say I practice it myself, only because I prefer going more all-out offensive. What I am saying though is that in battle, people oftentimes need to do what's necessary to win. In competitions where so much is at stake, there's seldom ever any room for chivalry. It's a matter of doing what's right vs. doing what's necessary.U can say that all u want. But that is selfish thinking. That overall isn't healthy for the community. I give props to m2k because sometimes he doesn't play super "gay" for that simple fact. Not much we can do tho because that is how brawl singles is...oh wait Japan doesn't play that way do they (not sarcasm)?
This post so much. Ally is a great guy to hang around. He's easy to socialize with and willing to entertain. Ally knows how to play Smash Bros, not just how to win. I feel like M2K may have lost touch with the spirit of Smash Bros: Hanging out with your friends, flinging a few items around, calling bs on the random occurrences but having a good laugh about it. Exercise that random button. Chaos may have no place in competition but it's a big part of friendly fun.To be fair I like seeing Ally win but...it's Ally. Friendly guy, respectful, good with multiple characters, etc. How your carry yourself certainly does go a long way no matter what it relates to in life.
It's not really a side note for the point being made, though. It's the heart of the matter, and it's why I don't like a fair amount of top players in this game.Sort of a side comment, but personal image can go a long way towards gaining support as well. Id hate to see lebron win anything because hes a cocky mofo who feels entitled to success before hes achieved it. Compare him to someone like Micheal Jordon, who won a lot but had a ton of class so people didnt really mind as much.
M2K is one of the least cocky top players in terms of how he approaches himself. He's not socially a genius but like... what do you want. If you take the time to meet the guy and just treat him like anyone else he's fun to hang out with.What we want to be true and what actually is true are two separate things. Yes it'd be nice if a persons hard work and dedication was enough to gain support, but it isnt.
And its true for everything. People hate what they consider 'dirty' or 'gay' tactics', and they hate when people win over and over again. This isnt exclusive to smash, thats the reality of being a competitor. To take jeers personally or blame others not only hinders personal progress but can make the situation itself worse. If how others view you is that important to you either become so good that you can play however you want (Mango) or be prepared to start losing before the targets removed from your back.
Sort of a side comment, but personal image can go a long way towards gaining support as well. Id hate to see lebron win anything because hes a cocky mofo who feels entitled to success before hes achieved it. Compare him to someone like Micheal Jordon, who won a lot but had a ton of class so people didnt really mind as much.
I like seeing allys snake win x)To be fair I like seeing Ally win but...it's Ally. Friendly guy, respectful, good with multiple characters, etc. How your carry yourself certainly does go a long way no matter what it relates to in life.
Funny, I thought gay meant happy. My mistake.well what is gay?
I always thought gay was a man who loves males.
I think even the most experienced competitors are affected by cheering. So I agree. What I dont agree with is M2K's attitude (at least in the posts he just made) that its something specific to smash, shouldnt be expected to happen, or that its specific to him personally as opposed to his position.M2K is one of the least cocky top players in terms of how he approaches himself. He's not socially a genius but like... what do you want. If you take the time to meet the guy and just treat him like anyone else he's fun to hang out with.
I do agree that community influence should have no influence on how you play. It's no john for performance, but that doesn't change the fact of what it is. Have you ever been cheered against by a large crowd? I'm pretty confident most of the community have had overall little or light personal interactions with trash talking or cheering against them... It's not a fun feeling, and when it's constant it's really hard.
What has helped me get over it is that if I have 1, just one person I know even they aren't saying anything and just chilling by me. But I know they are rooting for me and honestly think I can win, even if theres like 100+ people cheering against me I can try and tune into that positive energy.
well what is gay?
I always thought gay was a man who loves male's
IT DOES...Funny, I thought gay meant happy. My mistake.
that truely NEVER happened dude, that's one of the most annoying rumors everI mean as long as he's not allegedly skeetin in dudes beds and getting our game booted from mlg, m2k is a pretty cool guy, I think. (Not sarcasm)
He's not nearly as socially difficult. To be around as he was before, but he still is dumb and naive and has his little personality quirks,, but like he said, none of that even remotely makes him a bad person.
But anybody can admit, if someone wants a reason to root against m2k, they really wouldn't have to look very hard.
It's really not that simple. There's plenty of stuff that I've experienced and people I would trust with my life have experienced that make me dislike some top players. Lots of stupid, inconsiderate things that make me very frustrated with them, and make me dislike them as a person. No, I'm not gonna name names, because this isn't the place for that.I mean as long as he's not allegedly skeetin in dudes beds and getting our game booted from mlg, m2k is a pretty cool guy, I think.
He's not nearly as socially difficult. To be around as he was before, but he still is dumb and naive and has his little personality quirks,, but like he said, none of that even remotely makes him a bad person.
But anybody can admit, if someone wants a reason to root against m2k, they really wouldn't have to look very hard.
I agree with this post completely Dre, but somewhere earlier in the thread someone said that the tier list is a reflection of "how much a threat this character is in a tournament" or "how 'scared' you should be facing this character in a set"I don't understand the money-usage ratio system.
If I advance char X's metagame and have good results, why should the tier list not reflect that simply because 100 other X mains suck?
The amount of people using X doesn't change what the current peak of its meta is, and doesn't decrease the significance of that character's best results.
I thought the whole point of the tier list was to only consider high level play, yet then they use money-usage ratios, which means the lowest level of play affects tier placement.
A character's true potential would actually just be based purely on frame data, priority, physics etc. 'Current meta' would refer to the ATs etc. currently known. People always theorycraft about mix ups in MUs, but that is really a player v player thing, not char v char.
Truth^It's not really a side note for the point being made, though. It's the heart of the matter, and it's why I don't like a fair amount of top players in this game.