• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official BBR Tier List v6

Status
Not open for further replies.

bubbaking

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
6,895
Location
Baldwin, NY, USA or Alexandria, VA, USA (Pick one)
well mu wise idk which 3 characters have the best one.

I mean you can say Olimar because he has a lot of +4's and +3's but that is mostly vs garbage characters that don't excist basicly.
I mean why should a +4 on ganon make any sence?
in the other hand he still gets beaten by IC,falco and mk (mu chart says he lose from marth as well)
he doe defeat Pikachu,snake in top tier.

diddy doesn't **** most low tiers(but who cares?) as much as IC and oli do. He does beat pikachu and maybe marth in top tier.
but he only loses from mk and snake.

IC also **** a few low tiers they lose from mk,(snake?) Zss,TL,Peach which are not that commen
they defeat pikachu,Olimar and falco in top tier.
so I should say they are in top 3 best mu spreads in brawl.

Marth doesn't **** low tiers(those mu's aren't commen anyway) as much as IC and Olimar do. He loses from Diddy,D3 and mk.
he does beat wario,pikachu and snake in top tier.

snake doesn't **** low tiers as much as olimar and IC.Loses from marth,d3,pikachu,mk and Olimar.
and defeats diddy,(IC) in top tiers
Everyone loses to MK. Is it really necessary to list him as a reason someone's MU spread might be worse (or for anything for that matter)?
 

Z'zgashi

Smash Legend
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
17,322
Location
WeJo, Utah
NNID
ZzgashiZzShy
3DS FC
1521-3678-2980
Well, losing to MK -1 is much better than losing -3, so if that's the case, then it's a very good reason for one character having a better MU spread.
 

bubbaking

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
6,895
Location
Baldwin, NY, USA or Alexandria, VA, USA (Pick one)
In that case, Marth only loses to MK -1. :p

Going by results Marth still shouldn't be where he is when you take a look at MK, Olimar, Icys, Snake, Diddy results recently especially at nationals. There is no comparison whatsoever.

"Super super top level" Marths mess up technical stuff all the time as well.
I like how a bunch of people keep saying that Marth has no recent results, even though I keep citing a chart that specifically says otherwise... :reverse:
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=317124&page=3
"Recently" as you put it, Marth has won more money than ICs at MK banned tourneys. At MK legal tourneys, he's won more money than than Diddy and Oli. This time, we should not be comparing anyone to MK's winnings. He has 58% of ALL the winnings for heaven's sake!

Real talk though. I don't know squat about sonic. Does marth seriously lose to him?! Thats nuts.
Marth beats him +1, which sounds about right. What's everyone's problem? +1 is almost even... (-_-)

Olimar, Diddy, IC, MK, and Snake (if you're not silly) are better than Marth though.
Even though Marth beats Oli and Snake +1, goes even with ICs, and only loses to MK and Diddy -1? (<_<) It doesn't matter if everyone says that Marth's advantageous MUs are optimistic. I'm assuming that if a +1 was written on the charts, then it can at least be agreed that the MU is even-ish.
 

C.J.

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
4,102
Location
Florida
Marth beats him +1, which sounds about right. What's everyone's problem? +1 is almost even... (-_-)


Even though Marth beats Oli and Snake +1, goes even with ICs, and only loses to MK and Diddy -1? (<_<) It doesn't matter if everyone says that Marth's advantageous MUs are optimistic. I'm assuming that if a +1 was written on the charts, then it can at least be agreed that the MU is even-ish.
Marth does not beat Olimar at all. It's definitely an even MU, lol. Almost the entirety of the Marth boards, along with Mike (Ramin maybe? idr) agrees on that.

Beating Snake is really commonly argued to be even. It's really hard to call on that one.

Marth/Sonic is almost guaranteed to be even. Without getting into all the theorycraft behind it, looking just as results it actually bodes to being in Sonic's favor. (Go away Espy, it's even.)

Also vs Diddy is even. /unpopular opinion

And yes, +1 means close to even. But look at it from a weighted MU list point of view. Say everyone in top tier's MU number gets multiplied by 5 and then it decreases by 1 for each subsequent tier. For example, IC vs Fox is a +/- 4 MU. IC is in top tier while Fox is in mid tier. Since IC beats a midtier character with the number 4, you multiply that by 3 (the multiplier for midtier) and you get a relevance of +12. Do the same thing to fox and you get a relevance of -20.

Now apply this to Marth. If his +1s on Falco, Snake, and Olimar are +/- 0's, Marth's weighted MU score goes down by 15 points while all the rest go up by 5. This closes the gaps very quickly.

So yes, while +/- 1 does mean "evenish" it can have a huge impact when looking at it with a weighted MU list (which you should be- an unweighted list is practically useless).


Now, with all that out of the way, Marth's MU spread stops being 3rd in the game and likely drops to ~5th. Olimar, IC's, and Diddy may have less money than Marth (MK banned or legal depending on what the case may be), however they consistently place better than Marth when it counts. IC and arguably Diddy have a better MU vs MK. Olimar only has to focus on a few difficult MUs to learn while winning most other MUs solidly. Meanwhile Marth has to know each one of his 14+ even MUs inside and out in order to deal with them. He also has to play perfectly (which is unreasonable to assume and shouldn't be used as reasoning) throughout an entire tournament in order to be considered a threat. Now, which character seems more likely to pose a threat at the later rounds of a tournament (which is what matters)- Marth or Diddy/IC/and Olimar? I'd put money on the latter group each and every time.
 

C.J.

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
4,102
Location
Florida
Alright, didn't think so. Just making sure you don't get a wave of optimism and start <3
 

C.J.

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
4,102
Location
Florida
Viable tier:
MK, IC

Everyone else tier:
Everyone else





Oh wait, these guys are in the game?
Zelda, Ganon
 

~ Gheb ~

Life is just a party
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
16,917
Location
Europe
Well for what it's worth I think almost all of Marth's match-ups are floating somewhere between -1 and +1 with the majority of them being just 0:

-1 :metaknight: :dedede: :popo: [:diddy:] [:kirby2:] [:rob:]
0 [:diddy:] :snake: :falco: :olimar: :pikachu2: [:lucario:] [:zerosuitsamus:] [:toonlink:] :fox: :wolf: [:kirby2:] [:rob:] :sonic: [:ike:]
+1 :wario: [:lucario:] [:zerosuitsamus:] :gw: [:toonlink:] :peach: :dk2: :pit: [:ike:] :sheilda: / :sheik: :yoshi2:

If they're in [ ] they're somewhere between these numbers.
Marth has a negative record against Kirby / ROB so they might be -1 for him.
He has even records with Diddy, Lucario and Ike so they might be 0.
He has winning records vs ZSS and TL so they might be in his favor.

A lot of them are minimally in his favor but not enough to be called +1. For all intents and purposes these match-ups can be considered even.
It's also my [very subjective] opinion that Marth beats Mario, Bowser, Samus, Ganondorf and Zelda no worse than +2.

:059:
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
^
Same with a lot of other characters. With brackets he was trying to signify that the MU could be one of two values (eg Ike is 0/+1 for Marth, same with TL, ZSS and Lucario)
 

bubbaking

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
6,895
Location
Baldwin, NY, USA or Alexandria, VA, USA (Pick one)
Well for what it's worth I think almost all of Marth's match-ups are floating somewhere between -1 and +1 with the majority of them being just 0:

-1 :metaknight: :dedede: :popo: [:diddy:] [:kirby2:] [:rob:]
0 [:diddy:] :snake: :falco: :olimar: :pikachu2: [:lucario:] [:zerosuitsamus:] [:toonlink:] :fox: :wolf: [:kirby2:] [:rob:] :sonic: [:ike:]
+1 :wario: [:lucario:] [:zerosuitsamus:] :gw: [:toonlink:] :peach: :dk2: :pit: [:ike:] :sheilda: / :sheik: :yoshi2:

If they're in [ ] they're somewhere between these numbers.
Marth has a negative record against Kirby / ROB so they might be -1 for him.
He has even records with Diddy, Lucario and Ike so they might be 0.
He has winning records vs ZSS and TL so they might be in his favor.

A lot of them are minimally in his favor but not enough to be called +1. For all intents and purposes these match-ups can be considered even.
It's also my [very subjective] opinion that Marth beats Mario, Bowser, Samus, Ganondorf and Zelda no worse than +2.

:059:
Wait a sec, Marth vs ICs is even. I agree with pretty much the entirety of CJ's post, but nothing was said about Marth:IC's being worse than 0, and it isn't. Marth is fairly good at seperating the two, especially with sideB. He's also good at maintaining a protective spacing to prevent himself from being grabbed.

I don't see why Marth:Kirby is any less than +1 for Marth. Marth outranges Kirby badly and Kirby lacks the speed to disrupt Marth's zoning. On top of that, Kirby's light and dies quickly.

As for Ike, Marth is faster and gimps Ike much more easily. He can mixup between going offstage and gimping high recoveries and simply standing offstage and fsmashing/countering Ike's low recovery. Even if Marth reads wrong and goes offstage when Ike goes low, Marth receives a get-out-of-jail-free card in upB which, in itself, will gimp Ike if he isn't careful. In addition, his sideB can compete with Ike's jab in punishing/beating certain options and catching spot-dodges. Definitely +1 for Marth.
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
Done quickly, without looking at results/MU chart. Just an imo of how good each character is

God
S: :metaknight:

Top
A: :popo:, (:olimar:/:diddy:)
B: :pikachu2:, :snake:, :marth:, (:falco:/:wario:)

High
C: (:zerosuitsamus:/:fox:/:lucario:), :wolf:, :peach:, (:gw:/:toonlink:/:dedede:)

Mid
D: :rob:, :kirby2:, :dk2:, :pit:, :sonic:
E: :ness2:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :yoshi2:, :pt:, :ike:, :lucas:

Low
F: :samus2:, :falcon:, :luigi2:, :bowser2:, :mario2:
Hyrule: :link2:, :jigglypuff:, :zelda:, :ganondorf:

Didn't really know where to put Wolf and Pit...and Ike. I know nothing about these guys
 

bubbaking

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
6,895
Location
Baldwin, NY, USA or Alexandria, VA, USA (Pick one)
I don't see how Ganon isn't at least -4 vs Marth. There is nothing he can do.
It's +3 for Marth, which IMO, is a pretty fair evaluation of the MU. As Private said, there are.....moments when Ganon can punish Marth (hard), but spacing against Ganon is easy so it doesn't happen often.

Also, I don't know too much about Zelda, but Fuujin was arguing earlier that Marth:Zelda should be +4 for Marth. I don't exactly agree with that claim, but I think the current value of +3 is also accurate. I believe Fuujin's reasoning was that Marth can just pen Zelda against the ledge with superior spacing and there isn't anything that Zelda can do about it with her bad mobility.

Done quickly, without looking at results/MU chart. Just an imo of how good each character is

God
S: :metaknight:

Top
A: :popo:, (:olimar:/:diddy:)
B: :pikachu2:, :snake:, :marth:, (:falco:/:wario:)

High
C: (:zerosuitsamus:/:fox:/:lucario:), :wolf:, :peach:, (:gw:/:toonlink:/:dedede:)

Mid
D: :rob:, :kirby2:, :dk2:, :pit:, :sonic:
E: :ness2:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :yoshi2:, :pt:, :ike:, :lucas:

Low
F: :samus2:, :falcon:, :bowser2:, :mario2:
Hyrule: :link2:, :jigglypuff:, :zelda:, :ganondorf:
Holy cow, you put DDD really low... :O
 

NickRiddle

#negativeNick
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
9,913
Location
Florida
Done quickly, without looking at results/MU chart. Just an imo of how good each character is

God
S: :metaknight:

Top
A: :popo:, (:olimar:/:diddy:)
B: :pikachu2:, :snake:, :marth:, (:falco:/:wario:)

High
C: (:zerosuitsamus:/:fox:/:lucario:), :wolf:, :peach:, (:gw:/:toonlink:/:dedede:)

Mid
D: :rob:, :kirby2:, :dk2:, :pit:, :sonic:
E: :ness2:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :yoshi2:, :pt:, :ike:, :lucas:

Low
F: :samus2:, :falcon:, :bowser2:, :mario2:
Hyrule: :link2:, :jigglypuff:, :zelda:, :ganondorf:

Didn't really know where to put Wolf and Pit...and Ike. I know nothing about these guys
And Luigi is dead.
 

GOofyGV

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
1,108
Location
Netherlands
this is my opinion I change a lot with my opinion lately but I think this is about right

God
S::metaknight:

Top
A::popo:,:olimar:,:diddy:,:snake:
B::marth:,:falco:,:pikachu:,:wario:

High
C::zerosuitsamus:,:toonlink:,:lucario:,:dedede:,:gw:

high/mid
D::fox:,:wolf:,:peach:(these guys can be HT but I don't fee like puting them in HT:$)

Mid
E::rob:,:pit:,:dk2:,:kirby:,:ike:,:sonic:
F::sheilda:,:sheik:,:yoshi:,:lucas:,:ness:

Low:
G: :pt:,:mario:,:luigi:,:bowser:,:samus:
H::link:,:jigglypuff:,:ganondorf:,:zelda:,:falcon:
 

Nidtendofreak

Smash Hero
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
7,265
Location
Belleville, Ontario
NNID
TheNiddo
3DS FC
3668-7651-8940
Done quickly, without looking at results/MU chart. Just an imo of how good each character is

God
S: :metaknight:

Top
A: :popo:, (:olimar:/:diddy:)
B: :pikachu2:, :snake:, :marth:, (:falco:/:wario:)

High
C: (:zerosuitsamus:/:fox:/:lucario:), :wolf:, :peach:, (:gw:/:toonlink:/:dedede:)

Mid
D: :rob:, :kirby2:, :dk2:, :pit:, :sonic:
E: :ness2:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :yoshi2:, :pt:, :ike:, :lucas:

Low
F: :samus2:, :falcon:, :bowser2:, :mario2:
Hyrule: :link2:, :jigglypuff:, :zelda:, :ganondorf:

Didn't really know where to put Wolf and Pit...and Ike. I know nothing about these guys
An Ike made it to brackets at APEX and did decently at the MLGs. He ain't that low, and certainly never below PT or Yoshi.
 

~ Gheb ~

Life is just a party
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
16,917
Location
Europe
Peach loses -3 to MK, at least -2 to Falco / Snake, -1 to Diddy / Marth / DDD / Wolf, arguably loses to Lucario, Toon Link, Olimar and Fox. How is she high/-mid tier?

:059:
 

#HBC | ZoZo

Shocodoro Blagshidect
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
9,800
Location
Land of Nether
Done quickly, without looking at results/MU chart. Just an imo of how good each character is

God
S: :metaknight:

Top
A: :popo:, (:olimar:/:diddy:)
B: :pikachu2:, :snake:, :marth:, (:falco:/:wario:)

High
C: (:zerosuitsamus:/:fox:/:lucario:), :wolf:, :peach:, (:gw:/:toonlink:/:dedede:)

Mid
D: :rob:, :kirby2:, :dk2:, :pit:, :sonic:
E: :ness2:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :yoshi2:, :pt:, :ike:, :lucas:

Low
F: :samus2:, :falcon:, :luigi2:, :bowser2:, :mario2:
Hyrule: :link2:, :jigglypuff:, :zelda:, :ganondorf:

Didn't really know where to put Wolf and Pit...and Ike. I know nothing about these guys
9/10 great list :bee:
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
lol @ samus and falcon being above mario. @ V's list
Lol I know nothing about Mario either...but I honestly never understood why Falcon and Samus were so low, so I put them above him.
An Ike made it to brackets at APEX and did decently at the MLGs. He ain't that low, and certainly never below PT or Yoshi.
Well I specifically said that I wasn't looking at results at all so this list is pretty much 100% bias and I don't know why you bothered to bring up results
But anyway, Ike never below Yoshi? coughapexcough
And Luigi is dead.
Whoops, good catch. Edited him in.
 

smashkng

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
1,742
Location
Malmö, Sweden
NNID
Smashsk
3DS FC
0318-7423-9293
Ike is certainly not worse than PT or Ness. Ike doesn't have any unwinnables besides maybe MK, though Ike has still some options against him. Falcon IS clearly worse than Mario too. Mario has a much better moveset, better pressuring and safer moves than Falcon and Falcon's moveset isn't good for abusing his mobility. Mario's lack of range is really his only major weakness IMO.
 

Nidtendofreak

Smash Hero
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
7,265
Location
Belleville, Ontario
NNID
TheNiddo
3DS FC
3668-7651-8940
I guess I'll throw in my "likely to change within a few days" tier list.

S: :metaknight:

A: ( :snake: / :olimar: ) ( :popo: / :diddy: )
B: ( :falco: / :marth: ) ( :pikachu2: / :warioc: )

C: :zerosuitsamus: :toonlink: ( :lucario: / :gw: ) :dedede:

D: :wolf: :fox: :peach: :rob: :kirby2:
E: :sonic: :pit: ( :dk2: / :ike: ) :sheilda: :sheik: :yoshi2:

F: :luigi2: ( :ness2: / :pt: ) :lucas:

G: :mario2: :bowser2: :samus2: :falcon:
H: :link2: ( :zelda: / :jigglypuff: ) :ganondorf:

Yes, I think Snake is underrated. Yes, I think the spacies are overrated. No, I don't care about what happens over in Japan.
 

Doc King

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
1,790
I don't see how Ganon isn't at least -4 vs Marth. There is nothing he can do.
Ganon can actually punish stuff from marth and approach well beacause of the lack of a projectile.
Done quickly, without looking at results/MU chart. Just an imo of how good each character is

God
S: :metaknight:

Top
A: :popo:, (:olimar:/:diddy:)
B: :pikachu2:, :snake:, :marth:, (:falco:/:wario:)

High
C: (:zerosuitsamus:/:fox:/:lucario:), :wolf:, :peach:, (:gw:/:toonlink:/:dedede:)

Mid
D: :rob:, :kirby2:, :dk2:, :pit:, :sonic:
E: :ness2:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :yoshi2:, :pt:, :ike:, :lucas:

Low
F: :samus2:, :falcon:, :luigi2:, :bowser2:, :mario2:
Hyrule: :link2:, :jigglypuff:, :zelda:, :ganondorf:

Didn't really know where to put Wolf and Pit...and Ike. I know nothing about these guys
Wolf and Peach are too high (Especially Wolf). Wolf should be mid tier. He has too poor matchups against important characters like Wario and D3.

Peach should be like the lowest high tier.

Mario should be top of low tier and Lucas should be there too.

Zelda and Ganon should be in a tier of their own and Link and Puff should be in F tier.
SS: :metaknight: :popo:
S: :olimar: :diddy: :pikachu2: :snake:
A: :falco: :marth:

High
B: :wario: :zerosuitsamus: :lucario: :fox:
C: :toonlink: :dedede: :gw: :peach:

Mid
D: :wolf: :pit: :rob: :dk2: :kirby2: :sonic:
E: :ike: :sheilda: :ness2: :sheik: :pt: :yoshi2:

Low
F: :lucas: :mario2: :luigi2: :samus2: :link2: :falcon:
G: :bowser2: :zelda: :jigglypuff: :ganondorf:


Now get mad.
Better than infinites. I like how you put Fox over D3.

Fox seems to get underrated just because a few characters have some grab or lock gimmick on him but in reality he can be a good character (Similar to Falco).

Also Climbers shouldn't be in the same tier as mk.
this is my opinion I change a lot with my opinion lately but I think this is about right

God
S::metaknight:

Top
A::popo:,:olimar:,:diddy:,:snake:
B::marth:,:falco:,:pikachu:,:wario:

High
C::zerosuitsamus:,:toonlink:,:lucario:,:dedede:,:gw:

high/mid
D::fox:,:wolf:,:peach:(these guys can be HT but I don't fee like puting them in HT:$)

Mid
E::rob:,:pit:,:dk2:,:kirby:,:ike:,:sonic:
F::sheilda:,:sheik:,:yoshi:,:lucas:,:ness:

Low:
G: :pt:,:mario:,:luigi:,:bowser:,:samus:
H::link:,:jigglypuff:,:ganondorf:,:zelda:,:falcon:
Fox and Peach should be high and Wolf should be mid.
Zelda is worse than Ganondorf.
Zelda is probably slightly better because of King Dedede.

Here's my tier list:

God:
S: :metaknight:

Top:
A: :popo: :olimar: :snake: :diddy:
B: :marth: :falco: :pikachu2: :wario:

High:
C: :lucario: :zerosuitsamus: :fox: :dedede:
D: :toonlink: :gw: :peach:

Middle:
E: :wolf: :rob: :pit: :ike:
F: :sonic: :kirby2: :dk2: :yoshi2:
G: :sheilda: :sheik: :ness2:
Low:
H: :lucas: :mario2: :luigi2: :pt: :samus2: :falcon:
I: :bowser2: :link2: :jigglypuff:
Bottom:
J: :zelda: :ganondorf:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom