Conviction
Human Nature
...DAMN IT! When I saw Mystic post I was hoping for a blazing wall of Pit text.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wario has a 0-to-70% chaingrab on Falcon and a 0-to-90% chaingrab on Ganondorf. I imagine it would affect the matchup a good deal if it ever happened.Regarding Wario I think outside of high tier his "difficult" match-ups are...Falcon and Ganon as +1.
In this example, Luigi's results wouldn't be the only thing to take note of. If we noticed that Luigi straight-up massacred, say, Ice Climbers, within these results, perhaps Ice Climbers would deserve a drop for having a new and significant bad matchup. Have fewer people been playing Snake in favor of using Luigi? Also, how far up do we think Luigi should move? Which characters managed to keep Luigi in check?now onto a totally differant topic, why can't they update the tier list on a single character basis? i mean think about this for a minute, if one character starts to make a rise in tournaments (for example ill use luigi). say all of a sudden luigi mains start taking top 10 at a lot of tournaments in a row. and that this streak goes on for 4 months, while other character's placements are still reletively the same. why not just update luigi specifically on the tier list and make him higher? why not have an actively single per character status update when it is warrented instead of trying to compile every character's data once a year and have it take forever to release, just have a living tier that is always current to the relative data? that way, it would be kinda like a competition to see which mains can raise there character higher up the list as a whole.
does anyone else think this could be a good idea?
It would affect the matchup. However, Wario against Falcon, it would look kind of risky to try to chain grab falcon (Ganon I'm not sure). Doing chain grab in the beginning of the match will be better for Wario, but later on in the game, it can lead to a kill to Wario is he screws up and gets kneed by Falcon.Wario has a 0-to-70% chaingrab on Falcon and a 0-to-90% chaingrab on Ganondorf. I imagine it would affect the matchup a good deal if it ever happened.
Zigsta I really gotta disagree on getting outclassed by ALL the characters above him. I will admit if there is anything to hold PT back it will be lack of rep, but you cannot sit here and tell me he gets outclassed by that mid-tier portion he is the bottom of.How is Wario-Ganon/Link/Zelda even?
Ice, PT has no rep and gets outclassed by the characters above him.
Well, Wario would get three opportunities to rack up what would be the equivalent of two-to-four grab -> F-Air combos (or three-to-four grab release combos as Ganon). Falcon's grab range isn't very good (and Ganon's is horrible), whereas Wario's is definitely above average, though it's not particularly difficult for Falcon to get a grab.It would affect the matchup. However, Wario against Falcon, it would look kind of risky to try to chain grab falcon (Ganon I'm not sure). Doing chain grab in the beginning of the match will be better for Wario, but later on in the game, it can lead to a kill to Wario is he screws up and gets kneed by Falcon.
I think Zigsta meant that the characters immediately above PT generally do better in high tier matchups, rather than individual matchups against other mid tiers. That said, I don't think those characters fare much better, but as PT has very few results, it's hard to make that viewpoint seem valid.Zigsta I really gotta disagree on getting outclassed by ALL the characters above him. I will admit if there is anything to hold PT back it will be lack of rep, but you cannot sit here and tell me he gets outclassed by that mid-tier portion he is the bottom of.
We could run through this whole thing but just F tier alone holds no major flawed matchups
Ness: We have the advantage in the matchup
Luigi: We have the advantage
Yoshi: The grab release changes the matchup but I still think this could very well be even....if not in our favor
Ike: I've never seen this as a disadvantaged matchup.
I dont feel like going into a whole arguement here but Luis please jump in and inform me why outside of rep and attendence that PT can't move up. I feel like no one really knows the matchup and outside of a few bad high tier matchups (MK, Marth, and Diddy), but the matchups are really incorrect and oudated for PT.
I really can't think of anything DDD has done recently to merit not being below Lucario. At the very least, Lucario has been putting in at least some results and doesn't get punched in the face by most of top tier. Fact is, Lucario can definitely hold his own better against the likes of the higher tiers than DDD can, and this has been a trend since people figured out how to deal with D3's 08 bull****.I can't believe I read through this whole thing, but it's good to see player's opinions, and at least the tier list is getting better. Even though Lucario has been putting in work, I don't think he is better than DDD. I still think Fox/Wolf should be @ least above ZSS, but really @ the top of high instead of in mid tier. They both have very good options/KO power/survivability, and they have been putting in more work in tournaments recently. I don't think Pikachu should be in God tier. The problem with him is that he's been up high on the tier list so long that it takes longer for people's views to change if they are higher(I.E. Snake) compared to lower(I.E. Sonic). He more than likely should be below DDD, and near ZSS.
Idk why Kirby and Donkey Kong are over Rob and Pit. I 'm guessing because Rob/Pit haven't pulled in some good results collectively recently? Anyways, yes they are lower for now, but they are definitely better than Kirby/DK.
He's not in God tier, only MK is. If you meant top tier, I think he's fine where he is. Pikachu seems quite a bit better than everyone in C-tier, I'm sure many would agree. Pikachu is awesome.I don't think Pikachu should be in God tier.
Luis I think your dead on but of course all the snake players were adamant and the sad part is none of them outside of Ally know the matchup. Plain and simple people who vote on PT's matchup's just call us free and have no evidence or proof to back up their statements. When Ally said it was +1 snake he knew what he was talking about.I think Zigsta meant that the characters immediately above PT generally do better in high tier matchups, rather than individual matchups against other mid tiers. That said, I don't think those characters fare much better, but as PT has very few results, it's hard to make that viewpoint seem valid.
That said, I believe Pokémon Trainer is still a better character than his tier placement would suggest (not necessarily by a lot, but, still). He has very little rep, and most of the people who discuss the character don't have a great understanding of him. For example, during the matchup chart stuff, all the Snake players were adamant about that fact that they had a +2 (or even +3!)...except for Ally, who voted for +1.Fatigue is an exaggerated problem, and there isn't a lot of data on individual matchups. Also, no one plays Pokémon Trainer on an ideal level. I sure didn't; there were a lot of AT opportunities that I didn't make the most of. PT is definitely a precision character that takes a lot of work.Oh, wait--He's not a Snake player.
Uhhh when did Yoshi beat/even with Fox?Yoshi/PT is a weird match-up. It can be even if the Yoshi has a playstyle that he's comfortable using, but if he can change it up (play aggressively against Squirtle, defensively/campy against Ivysaur, and passive aggressive against Charizard), then it seems in Yoshi's favor from my experience. Yoshi goes even/beats every character in mid-tier (except for Wolf and maybe Peach).
Wolf is certainly much better than Kirby. Kirby just has absolutely nothing to do except shieldgrab, bair all day, run-and-gun, and hope for the best. Kirby is not too reliable of a character right now. And DK really does outpace Kirby by a lot. Will can tell you so.WHY, KIRBY, WHYYYYYYYYYYYY!? No, seriously, why? I don't see how he's worse than DK or Wolf.
T'was a joke on the BBR's part.Why is the random button in the Mid Tier? It should be in the bottom because you only have a small chance of getting one of the top 5 characters! useless in money tournaments.
Yoshi isn't top mid-tier at all imo, but he really isn't that bad, and guys like Delta-Cod, Raptor, and other Yoshi mains have been showing why. He doesn't have a huge amount of tools like the top tiers do, but he can handle himself quite well. TBH, I think he could definitely see much more of a bump in future lists, but going to the point where Wolf/Fox/Peach is will probably never happen. If it does, that's the farthest he'll ever go.I don't get how Yoshi keeps inching his way forward. Why do the BBR members think he's got a shot at the Mid leagues? He only has 10 winning match-ups, 7 of which are against Low Tiers anyway. He has 25% more losing match-ups than winning and even match-ups combined. My point; he can't fight anyone worth a damn.
Someone has obviously never fought a true Yoshi main.I don't get how Yoshi keeps inching his way forward. Why do the BBR members think he's got a shot at the Mid leagues? He only has 10 winning match-ups, 7 of which are against Low Tiers anyway. He has 25% more losing match-ups than winning and even match-ups combined. My point; he can't fight anyone worth a damn.
I was joking as well.T'was a joke on the BBR's part.
after seeing a few more recent Yoshi fights, I agree that he's not a useless punching bag like the rest of Low Tier, but he's not really good either. He has the potential of a bottom-Mid, but those match-ups are gonna be a problem. I think that the bottom of Mid is the farthest he should go for now.Yoshi isn't top mid-tier at all imo, but he really isn't that bad, and guys like Delta-Cod, Raptor, and other Yoshi mains have been showing why. He doesn't have a huge amount of tools like the top tiers do, but he can handle himself quite well. TBH, I think he could definitely see much more of a bump in future lists, but going to the point where Wolf/Fox/Peach is will probably never happen. If it does, that's the farthest he'll ever go.
I think it means someone who mains Yoshi in real tournaments, instead of just using him because he (was) the best in LT tourneys.A -true- Yoshi main? What does that even mean? :/
Most characters aren't that difficult to pick up. You don't have to have years of experience under your belt to master a character. All it takes is some dedication, and that doesn't even have to be as a main. The important things are being good with the character and having ample matchup experience.I mean someone who has played Yoshi since the game came out and knows everything about the character as well as has MU experience. You can be "good" with a character without maining said character, but when you focus solely on that character, then you take 'em to a different level.
Yeah, but Yoshi is the weirdest character in the cast. 99% of the time, you'll use your up-B before you jump to recover, you can't jump out of shield, etc... It's hard to pick Yoshi up specifically without dedication.Most characters aren't that difficult to pick up. You don't have to have years of experience under your belt to master a character. All it takes is some dedication, and that doesn't even have to be as a main. The important things are being good with the character and having ample matchup experience.
And I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying that IF you have only one character you're playing, then you HAVE to learn ALL your match-ups whether they're good or bad. If you're not willing to put the time in to learn the bad match-ups, then why not just pick MK?You have a point, but I'm not seeing how only focusing on one character (who was never that good in the first place) is practical.
It's probably just preference or they are just comfortable with only that character. For a while I was only comfortable playing Kirby.You have a point, but I'm not seeing how only focusing on one character (who was never that good in the first place) is practical.
Being fundamentally different from the rest of the cast is not the same as being difficult to master.Yeah, but Yoshi is the weirdest character in the cast. 99% of the time, you'll use your up-B before you jump to recover, you can't jump out of shield, etc... It's hard to pick Yoshi up specifically without dedication.
Point taken. For me personally, Yoshi just clicks with me. I have played around with alternates, but Yoshi's the only one with whom I can do everything I want to do.Being fundamentally different from the rest of the cast is not the same as being difficult to master.
I do agree with Yoshi being one of the most difficult characters to make the most of, but I'm not sure I would call him the most difficult to make the most of, or even "the weirdest."
That's fine, and it's totally natural. Certain characters just work better for different players, regardless of how different or bad other people might find them to be.Point taken. For me personally, Yoshi just clicks with me. I have played around with alternates, but Yoshi's the only one with whom I can do everything I want to do.
a) imo Yoshi beats PT solidlyZigsta I really gotta disagree on getting outclassed by ALL the characters above him. I will admit if there is anything to hold PT back it will be lack of rep, but you cannot sit here and tell me he gets outclassed by that mid-tier portion he is the bottom of.
We could run through this whole thing but just F tier alone holds no major flawed matchups
Ness: We have the advantage in the matchup
Luigi: We have the advantage
Yoshi: The grab release changes the matchup but I still think this could very well be even....if not in our favor
Ike: I've never seen this as a disadvantaged matchup.
I dont feel like going into a whole arguement here but Luis please jump in and inform me why outside of rep and attendence that PT can't move up. I feel like no one really knows the matchup and outside of a few bad high tier matchups (MK, Marth, and Diddy), but the matchups are really incorrect and oudated for PT.
It's kinda getting mixed feelings for them actually. Some say too high others say it is fine.that moment when EVERY LUCARIO PLAYER looks at the tier list and disagrees that their character JUMPED on the tier list
Then why did you bring it up?LOL this argument is not worth having, you're all dumb, bye.
I never thought the numbers played that much into it when there is a lot of variance and opinions that went around.This is wrong, or the vote tallies wouldn't actually say anything. If you're going to decide where characters are ranked despite the vote, why vote? So you can claim there was some amount of science in the process when there wasn't?
The voting says exactly how good each character is, or voting is worthless.
Well firstly T you seem to misunderstand my post because the only reason I pointed out those characters were because zigsta said everyone above PT outclasses him. I never said that PT beating Luigi means he should be higher than them, I rather was explaining that in reference to PT's tier alone that he has positive or even matchups with almost everyone in his tier. I did not feel like continuing to go through the tier showing good and bad matchups, but cmon T stop making me seem like I'm doing something Im not.a) imo Yoshi beats PT solidly
b) the head to head matchup is not what decides which character should be higher. just because PT beats Ness and Luigi doesn't mean he should be higher than them
If you're referring to the BBR MU Chart... it's inaccurate for alot of characters, with Yoshi being one of them.I don't get how Yoshi keeps inching his way forward. Why do the BBR members think he's got a shot at the Mid leagues? He only has 10 winning match-ups, 7 of which are against Low Tiers anyway. He has 25% more losing match-ups than winning and even match-ups combined. My point; he can't fight anyone worth a damn.
Aren't you the one who dropped PT for Wario like A used *****?Also, I think you're wrong about the average player's lack drive to stick with their main and learn how to manage seemingly-bad matchups, and it is especially so for the above-average players.
This, along with his other posts about Yoshi just clicking with him... I've tried other characters in friendlies tons of times. Only other character I could think of is Lucario that was fun to play.Yeah, but Yoshi is the weirdest character in the cast. 99% of the time, you'll use your up-B before you jump to recover, you can't jump out of shield, etc... It's hard to pick Yoshi up specifically without dedication.