Conviction
Human Nature
。。。やれやれ。。。なぜ ほんとぅ?ため
1ochars
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
。。。やれやれ。。。なぜ ほんとぅ?ため
1ochars
Because people are stupid as ****. Once someone moves up and give lighter insight to the situation (this time being Sonic) and turn everything around about their thoughts. This was NEVER discussed during the previous tier list and it's stupid.So could someone please answer me why Fox and Wolf are leaps and bounds above peach? i mean with espy's (and to an extent some others) post of sonic should be above peach but should never be put up above wolf...makes it sound like fox and wolf should be the only ones in D tier and peach in E tier. Why is this ?
LOL dat chibo exception :oeveryone that used rob quit except for chibo. lol
Pits don't need that logic. They need results. Because that's all the tier list will ever be based upon and not simple common sense. Which ironically if we used more common sense, we'd be able to see that Pit does fine in other regions and not just our own, including Europe and Japan. But we don't care about Japan, do we?Boredom?
Because some people seriously try to use that logic with their character? *coughpitcough*
No I don't and I won't. Read everything about this thread before you post such posts as this. And please quote.Mechawave, you've got explaining to do then. The other mains have either agreed that Wolf is better, or failed to give good reasoning to why Peach is better, other than "turnip potential".
it's better to say that I think he will be, he just isn't right now.。。。やれやれ。。。なぜ ほんとぅ?
DK he *****, Ganon and Bowser as well. The others yes.I'm not arguing that he loses to these characters, I'm arguing that they have viable matchups against him. Wario's ONLY advantage is the ability to run away. And these characters can camp back if they get percent leads the same way.
Wario loses to almost all of top tier tier, and has even-ish matchups with most of mid tier and a lot of tier. It doesn't even matter if he beats all of low tier, he BARELY most of them beats them. Wario doesn't **** Zelda, or Falcon, or Ganon, or Bowser, or Luigi, or Ike, or DK. His matchup spread is worse than ROB or Kirbys. He's better than them, but the number of characters he's likely to lose to even at top level is pretty huge compared to everyone else in top tier... Imo he's top tier but at the bottom.
Thank you sir :DTbh, I'd have to look over peach again so I wouldn't say anything stupid. So I can probably give you a solid answer by tomorrow.
@Ripple そぅ です か? たのしぃ。
Bit puzzled about this part, would you mind finding the post(s) where this was said? This thread moves far too fast lolMechawave, you've got explaining to do then. The other mains have either agreed that Wolf is better, or failed to give good reasoning to why Peach is better, other than "turnip potential".
Cause Peach players play stupid and don't focus on alot of important stuff. Thus the public see's this and BOOM. You have your tier list with her.So could someone please answer me why Fox and Wolf are leaps and bounds above peach? i mean with espy's (and to an extent some others) post of sonic should be above peach but should never be put up above wolf...makes it sound like fox and wolf should be the only ones in D tier and peach in E tier. Why is this ?
I think Kuro posted it, then Dark Pch addressed it right before he went in hard. I'm on my phone right now so going back to find it would take some time. Just search for posts by those two users in this thread.Bit puzzled about this part, would you mind finding the post(s) where this was said? This thread moves far too fast lol
Is it supposed to be like, 'Turnip potential' in general or in specific MU's?
Okey dokeyI think Kuro posted it, then Dark Pch addressed it right before he went in hard. I'm on my phone right now so going back to find it would take some time. Just search for posts by those two users in this thread.
So you're saying that Pit has tons of representation and no good U.S. results, but Kirby has no representation and no good U.S. results?Pits don't need that logic. They need results. Because that's all the tier list will ever be based upon and not simple common sense. Which ironically if we used more common sense, we'd be able to see that Pit does fine in other regions and not just our own, including Europe and Japan. But we don't care about Japan, do we?
Kirby has. no one. NO ONE. (except for the lovable Kewwky). Pit has a legion of mains that can attest to match up spreads, data, and actual facts, not ring-around logic about "potential".
Except Peach's results don't trump Sonic's, and neither have pulled off major stuff in the same league as Wolf and Fox over the season, with the exception of Sonic's run at MLG Dallas.I agree. And the more consistently high results, the closer to being high tier, ie Fox/Wolf/Peach.
I don't mind, really. Go for it.I died. Would you mind if I sigged this?
Now, really? SONIC? I'm fine with this +2 deal but people are saying Sonic > Peach. Please man, that's pathetic everyone thinks so lowly without thinking about the cold hard facts. I understand he may be somewhat better than DK but no... Peach? Gimme a break. Dumb****s. -_-
Sonic and Peach's match up spreads are nearly identical, and the two of them have identical results for the entirety of the season. Sonic has a one up in a major area in MLG Dallas' results, but Peach players DID technically outplace Sonic's at WHOBO3. In each respective region, Sonic and Peach are placing in the same area.So could someone please answer me why Fox and Wolf are leaps and bounds above peach? i mean with espy's (and to an extent some others) post of sonic should be above peach but should never be put up above wolf...makes it sound like fox and wolf should be the only ones in D tier and peach in E tier. Why is this ?
This is what I said before to answer your question:Alright maybe i worded that poorly but my question wasnt why fox and wolf are above peach, i have yet to seen too much of fox and wolf yet to determine if i have any problems with this. My question is why does it sound like the gap between peach and the other two are so huge that sonic being above her is fine, but sonic being above wolf is ludacris? PM me or post with a actual explanation here please people D: It would be highly appreciated
The funny thing is that you talk about all the mistakes Peach players make, without acknowledging the mistakes Wolf, Sonic, Donkey Kong and Pit players make. Smaller risks and greater rewards are what make a good character, which is why Wolf is better than Peach. You can play just as smart with Wolf as with Peach and get a greater result. And that doesn't make Peach complex or technical or difficult to use, it just makes her bad.I know you Tesh trolling but this gives me a chance to clear something up. There is a different with not being a smart player and also not playing smart. There is always times when you have even seen top players do some stupid ****. But people tend to take what I say about Peach players insulting (go figure)
Like Not to long ago. I was playing some diddy on wifi. You know how I played this dude? All I did was just Float and dair him all day. I lost the game for that. he can just roll away or run away then throw a naner at me easy. and thats all he did for me playing typical. Instead of just waiting and chilling out I did not pay attention to his playstyle, I did not pay attention to his habits or how he reacts when I went near him. And I never abused the Fact that when I get near him, he always rolled behind me.
I already know what to do and how to handle diddy. And I even broke the players habits down. But did I play by it? No. A played basic HOPING it would work cause I really didi not feel like thinking much in the match to win. I do this **** alot when I know better. So I can have a big dunce cap on my head and smile like a moron.
This happens alot to the rest. Sometimes they depend on luck cause Peach has good qualities. But don't pay much attention to the downside of it. Thus you see just about the same playstyle or the same thing for all of them. Nothing new. And people already know how to deal with this. So why not switch it up and hit them with something different. So Much **** and mix ups Peach has. But people just don't wanna work that hard.
They ether be lazy or just can't keep that focus stamina up. And just start to depend on luck. the fact that Peach has so much **** to work with and do can make a person go bonkers. But who's fault is that. it is not Peach Fault. The player can actually do all this. They choose not cause "dsfawdfasgdfhsalgi" Thats a player problem. They don't wanna go that extra mile knowing they MUST. HAVE TOO. IF THEY WANNA DESTROY.
Thus, the image of Peach that we have today and the stupid **** people say still goes on. Aint no one to blame but the players. if Peaches were to finally but in work like their life is on the line, they we see some ****. This is why I gave up caring about her on the list and what people say about her on it. They can put her below ganon for all I care. Words aint gonna change **** in this messed up community. And people will keep saying the dumb **** like they have in this thread. So I just chill and laugh at all these post relating to Peach now.
And please, I preach all this but don't think I exclude myself from it all. I might be one of the biggiest scrub examples for this. But the thing is, I can actually admit it and not be clouded by ego or hype. When I start doing **** right with this character over and over, I'll take and give myself more credit same with the others. But until then. I'm just a Peach player that seriously needs to get busy or else I'll keep placing like **** and lose to just about everyone.
Uh, Why would I break down characters that don't matter to me nor am I getting at? I have yet to even go in on why Peach is better than wolf. I'll shut the damm communities game down on this. But looks like I might have too cause so far I am just hearing BS on why Peach is better. Same as to why wolf is better.The funny thing is that you talk about all the mistakes Peach players make, without acknowledging the mistakes Wolf, Sonic, Donkey Kong and Pit players make. Smaller risks and greater rewards are what make a good character, which is why Wolf is better than Peach. You can play just as smart with Wolf as with Peach and get a greater result. And that doesn't make Peach complex or technical or difficult to use, it just makes her bad.
You essentially did two things:So you're saying that Pit has tons of representation and no good U.S. results, but Kirby has no representation and no good U.S. results?
No offense, but you just confused the hell out of me. Are you attacking Kirby or Pit?
All this and I see Yoshi nowhere... What do you think about the Yoshi Vs Wario MU DMG?DK he *****, Ganon and Bowser as well. The others yes.
His MU spread is too evenish lol. He doesn't lose to most of top tier, but he's not pulling any real advantages on them either. Most of his MU's are 55:45 either character's favor up there, Snake being debatable but probably just 55:45.
MK Marth are obvious. Snake is fairly even, same with Pika Olimar. IC... god knows what that MU is. Ideally probably slight IC favor, on a more realistic note where Nana gets *****, 55:45 Wario. Falco could win that, don't see that being past 6:4 ever though.
I think Wario is in the general right place so far. The 3 characters under him all certainly have the potential to be better (IC's for sure), Some of their MU's seem really undecided though. Pika for example, what IS the Pika vs MK MU? Does he beat Snake? How hard is his MU with IC's? Does he go evenish with Diddy or does Diddy win? What about Marth? Or Oli, how does he really do vs MK or Diddy or Falco or etc? Those seem much harder to "pin down" than general **** like Wario vs Diddy is 55:45 or yeah Wario sucks vs Marth.
I could see Olimar above Wario. I think Pika is the short end of the top tier stick. His range being comparable to Wario's does not fare him well when it comes to gay spacing ****, and I think that will tend to keep him from dominating.
A handful of smart MK players... but the few stupid ones that think characters like Yoshi is 55:45/-1?Dark Peach is right.
All Peach players are stupid and all Wolf players are smart. Metaknight players are probably smart too in that same way.