• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Meta Knight Officially Banned!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
This is absolutely not true. By fact of frame data, OR practicality.
The effect the LGL has had is more of a psychological one. People often fail to take into account that they CAN plank as long as the game doesn't go to time, so they just don't plank at all.

There are lots of situations where planking is a good idea, if you watch Tearbear vs. SK92 on Pokemon Stadium you can see TB intelligently planking to gain an advantage through the stage transformations.
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
MK is the best secondary in the game. Also, correct me if I'm wrong but hasn't every top player in Melee used Fox as a secondary at one point or another?
you are wrong on the melee statement. people who don't or didn't follow melee for at least 3 years shouldn't talk about melee like they know it
I did. PC Chris, Ken, M2K and Mango all have and had Fox secondaries
Darkrain, Hbox, shroomed, kirby kaze, Kage, AXE, Hugs,
ADHD, Razor, Trela, Esam, Nick Riddle, Gnes
none of these players play melee.

wtf is the point of this post?
What was the point of your post? Your players don't use fox, Mine don't use MK

try being intelligent, seriously. try it sometime.

none of the top players I listed play fox. we were talking about melee
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
8,905
Location
Vinyl Scratch's Party Bungalo
NNID
Budget_Player
Lain, TKD, MJG, OS, Vinnie, Logic...probably more I can't think of atm
Overswarm and Lain are both incredibly old news. This was what, two years ago? Might as well count me; I switch from snake to MK about two years ago. :awesome: Or M2K, who went from ****** everyone with DDD to ****** everyone with MK a few years back. Obviously there's a reason we ignore old statistics. TKD plays MK on counterpicks only, because he's convinced that MK is broken as **** on them. Vinnie and Logic are news to me. Most of these are not truly top players.

Anti bans- 25% of an arbitray community which owes them nothing, who complain when the other 75% want to play differently, and insist that the 75% play their way, after having it their way for three years.

Anything wrong with this statement?
Yep, the %s are probably inaccurate. Assuming they are accurate though? The only problem I could throw up is the fact that pro-ban does not universally want to play the game the same way. The stage rage crew, the ISP crowd, and many more such fringe groups are pretty widely pro-ban. Oh and it's an appeal to the majority. That said...

On a whole though... Well, there's a reason I'm here more for DA practice than anything else. This argument really does just squash anti-ban. Everything in this community is an appeal to majority.

I do think Bridge of Eldin should be legal (along with the majority of stages + FLoSSing) but I still don't understand the point you are trying to make here.
Case in point, Dre. -.-

MK has a lower LGL than the other characters... Which does make it a specific nerf.
ASLDFKJ$OIF§$(GHG OH MY GOD MY BRAIN JUST EXPLODED.

And you know what? I didn't want to play against Diddy Kong's banana camping when ADHD popularized it early on in the game's life, I'm sure there were a few people who thought Diddy Kong was a really gay character after playing against him... Do you want to know what those players did?

They stopped whining, stopped being scrubs and got better. Why can't the community do this with LGLs?
Beats me, maybe because it's two very different strategies with very different risk/rewards and different options for beating them? Look, I know, it's scrubby as ****. That doesn't make it wrong for the community though. Case in point: Port Town and Norfair are still pretty much universally banned.

Oh great, you're back >_>
Oh god so much this.

none of these players play melee.

wtf is the point of this post?
To show that the analogy fits. Grim can showcase top melee players who didn't pick up fox; Jebus can showcase top brawl players who didn't pick up MK.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
8,905
Location
Vinyl Scratch's Party Bungalo
NNID
Budget_Player
The effect the LGL has had is more of a psychological one. People often fail to take into account that they CAN plank as long as the game doesn't go to time, so they just don't plank at all.

There are lots of situations where planking is a good idea, if you watch Tearbear vs. SK92 on Pokemon Stadium you can see TB intelligently planking to gain an advantage through the stage transformations.
There are a lot of situations where planking isn't broken. Like when it's extremely limited.
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
Lain, TKD, MJG, OS, Vinnie, Logic...probably more I can't think of atm
None of those players would ever get as far as they do now without their other characters
thats exactly why I listed them
but you make it seem like the only reason they place where they place is because of MK
I didn't make it seem like anything. l2read
MK is the best secondary in the game. Also, correct me if I'm wrong but hasn't every top player in Melee used Fox as a secondary at one point or another?
you are wrong on the melee statement. people who don't or didn't follow melee for at least 3 years shouldn't talk about melee like they know it
I did. PC Chris, Ken, M2K and Mango all have and had Fox secondaries
Darkrain, Hbox, shroomed, kirby kaze, Kage, AXE, Hugs,
ADHD, Razor, Trela, Esam, Nick Riddle, Gnes
none of these players play melee.

wtf is the point of this post?
What was the point of your post? Your players don't use fox, Mine don't use MK
try being intelligent, seriously. try it sometime.

none of the top players I listed play fox. we were talking about melee
It would make sense if you went back as far as this post. Also, any character in S tier is basically an MK equivalent (not just fox)

there happy?
 

Smooth Criminal

Da Cheef
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
13,576
Location
Hinckley, Minnesota
NNID
boundless_light
You can look at it this way.
Even if banning MK isn't 100% the right decision competitively, it's still the right decision for the competitive community.
It's still an appeal to majority. XD "Right" is highly subjective especially when you guys don't even know for sure yet. It's more or less an educated guess.

Smooth Criminal
 

Ghostbone

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
4,665
Location
Australia
It's still an appeal to majority. XD "Right" is highly subjective especially when you guys don't even know for sure yet.

Smooth Criminal
It's argument ad populum, but it's still perfectly relevant.
There's a difference between saying "MK is broken because 76% of the community thinks so," and "MK should be banned because 76% of the community agrees"
The former is fallacious, the latter makes sense...
 

Orion*

Smash Researcher
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
4,503
Location
Dexters Laboratory
none of these players play melee.

wtf is the point of this post?
His point was that most top players in melee also have a pocket fox in comparison to the fact that most top players in brawl have a pocket mk.

Ripple said:
Ripple naming people who picked up MK and did well with them
Lain, TKD, MJG, OS, Vinnie, Logic...probably more I can't think of atm
None of these players MKs even matter bar TKD.

Lains MK is ***. OS is ***. Logics MK is beyond ***. I personally think Vinnies mk is extremely good but he hasnt even really done that much with the character (but at this point he's winning with so many characters). Not sure on MJGs mk, I don't really remember it (although that tells me something :| ).
 

John12346

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
3,534
Location
New York, NY
NNID
JohnNumbers
Here's the full list of people who have won money with MK in 2011.

Ripple, you can go ahead and use this to find more names if necessary.

Mew2King
Ally
ANTi
Seibrik
HolyNightmare
Lain
Tyrant
RedHalberd
DarkLink
Dojo
Atomsk
Jem
kismet2
Lee Martin
Gnes
SuPeRbOoM
Vinnie
Kadaj
Nairo
Sago
Zex
Havok
Dphat
KillLock
Ensis
Lee
Pwii
Umbra
Nerd
Judge
Lie
MTL
Domo
Kel
MN Moe
Shugo
Sparta Kick
Alphicans
Xaltis
Jtails
Tearbear
ADHD
Marshall
DJIskascribble
Reflex
Cheese
Magik
MeroKnight
BigLou
Hylian
Gallax
Koolaid
Sin242
Toronto Joe
Hype
Logic
Breez
Vex
Seagull
Izumi
Korn
Cura
Infinity
Mongoose
Shadow
Pelca
Neo
Bloodcross
Sync
Arty
Frank Rizzle
V3GA
M@v
Micaelis
Warioman!
d4b8
Inui
DEHF
FAE
Boxxy
EE
Spuperwolf
MetaKill
TypeX
Junebug
Xzax
Felix
Omni
jpIsCrAzY
Overswarm
H1N1
Iliad
ChKn
Tantalus
Genghis Pot
Mampam
Bassem
K9
Moe
Curlz
Sushi
Jbandrew
Gio
Bowyer
TKD
ResTy
Firefly
Kaffei
TKCK
Battou
Deap
Viviff
Dakpo
Poyo
MikeHAZE
Smurf
DRN
JMo
Stud Stallion
Blaise
Xdeath
Maki
Chaz
VICE
Facey
Fino
Nacho
NAKAT
Fonz
Sean
Clel
Crazy
Voltage
Fiji
Will_
Lethal Trilogy
DoomMachine
Afro
yoshQ
Fatboy
Mintyflesh
Gebroni
TrumpTight
MJG
Ryquaza
SSGuy
WTP
TV
Archer
Almo
Eggz
Flame
Bluez
Rayquaza07
Dawei
Fizzle
Kola
Pitzer
DLA
Mikalott
lol.
.D
Mr. L
MeekSpeedy
KoN!
KiraFlax
Panty
KingAce
69dude
Rei-Gun
Shank
Angel Lopez
Kassandra
Stroumbert
HINKAGE
Boss
Paul Wall
UltimateRazer
Sax
Culex
Bpow
Orion
Tiger
Azure_Kenny
PzO
Ori_Bro
Mar1
Billybeegood
Jard
Bizkit
Marly
ALSM
DarkShifter
Mooninite
Junk
Dis-gord
NGAMER
Chouceman
Kyokoro
Twinx
JoeST
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
963
Location
Chicago,IL
NNID
MasterHavik

Smooth Criminal

Da Cheef
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
13,576
Location
Hinckley, Minnesota
NNID
boundless_light
It's argument ad populum, but it's still perfectly relevant.
There's a difference between saying "MK is broken because 76% of the community thinks so," and "MK should be banned because 76% of the community agrees"
The former is fallacious, the latter makes sense...
I'm not well-versed in debate jargon. Thanks for clearing that up.

My point still stands, though. Most of the pro-banners can breathe their collective sighs of relief now, but what about later? *shrugs.*

I think the overcentralization criterion is going to come back and bite the Brawl community in the *** one of these days.

Edit: @ Kirby x Sonic: I don't care if you're thirty. With that kinda mentality, you're a kid.

Smooth Criminal
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,158
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
BPC- Yes it's an appeal to authority amongst other things, but when you have a community playing a video game, there is nothing wrong with that. Especially when the people who don't like the changes aren't forced to stay in that community.

I find it ridiculous to think it's reasonable to demand that 75% of people play a video game the way 25% wants.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
Case in point, Dre. -.-
FLoSSing is an amazing method of stage selection. Don't knock it.

ASLDFKJ$OIF§$(GHG OH MY GOD MY BRAIN JUST EXPLODED.
That's nice.

Beats me, maybe because it's two very different strategies with very different risk/rewards and different options for beating them? Look, I know, it's scrubby as ****. That doesn't make it wrong for the community though. Case in point: Port Town and Norfair are still pretty much universally banned.
I know :c

There are a lot of situations where planking isn't broken. Like when it's extremely limited.
Oh, I know, I wasn't trying to make a case for MK being banworthy, just speaking my thoughts aloud, I guess.
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
BPC- Yes it's an appeal to authority amongst other things, but when you have a community playing a video game, there is nothing wrong with that. Especially when the people who don't like the changes aren't forced to stay in that community.

I find it ridiculous to think it's reasonable to demand that 75% of people play a video game the way 25% wants.
But if we get to vote for decisions like this, then why not for others like only three starters and banning Brinstar and RC?
 

Smooth Criminal

Da Cheef
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
13,576
Location
Hinckley, Minnesota
NNID
boundless_light
BPC- Yes it's an appeal to authority amongst other things, but when you have a community playing a video game, there is nothing wrong with that. Especially when the people who don't like the changes aren't forced to stay in that community.

I find it ridiculous to think it's reasonable to demand that 75% of people play a video game the way 25% wants.
I don't think BPC was inferring that it was good or bad. I think he was referring to the fact that it is what it is.

>_> I'm beginning to think Alt's right about you, Dre. You really like to cram words in somebody's mouth.

But, yeah. You're right about the demands of the lesser percentiles---if that were really the case. It's still majority rules, though.

Smooth Criminal
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,158
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
But if we get to vote for decisions like this, then why not for others like only three starters and or banning Brinstar and RC?
If the community for some reason all of a sudden wants to use items, then no one has the right to tell them they can't. If you insist on playing without items, you can just go make your own separate community.

People are acting as if they're stuck in this community and are forced to go to MK banned tourneys.

It's a video game community, it's not under any moral obligation when it comes to these decisions. It's not as if anti-bans are owed anything, having such a big community is a privellage to begin with.

The people who rule changes hurt the most are the top players who make money, but they are probably owed the least seeing as they've taken the most. It's not as if the community is obliged to cater to them anyway.
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
If the community for some reason all of a sudden wants to use items, then no one has the right to tell them they can't. If you insist on playing without items, you can just go make your own separate community.

People are acting as if they're stuck in this community and are forced to go to MK banned tourneys.

It's a video game community, it's not under any moral obligation when it comes to these decisions. It's not as if anti-bans are owed anything, having such a big community is a privellage to begin with.

The people who rule changes hurt the most are the top players who make money, but they are probably owed the least seeing as they've taken the most. It's not as if the community is obliged to cater to them anyway.
But these Polls would also be voted on by the community
 

da K.I.D.

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
19,658
Location
Rochester, NY
If the community for some reason all of a sudden wants to use items, then no one has the right to tell them they can't. If you insist on playing without items, you can just go make your own separate community.

People are acting as if they're stuck in this community and are forced to go to MK banned tourneys.

It's a video game community, it's not under any moral obligation when it comes to these decisions. It's not as if anti-bans are owed anything, having such a big community is a privellage to begin with.

The people who rule changes hurt the most are the top players who make money, but they are probably owed the least seeing as they've taken the most. It's not as if the community is obliged to cater to them anyway.
I like this a lot.
adhd, esam, and nick riddle all played melee before brawl came out lol
Im not too sure this is true.

I feel like Esam at the least started playing melee after brawl came out.
 

da K.I.D.

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
19,658
Location
Rochester, NY
the difference between fox and metaknight is that depending on who you ask, theres 1-4 characters in the same tier as fox. Theres nobody in the same tier as Mk, since hes that far above every other character in his game. fox is not like that.
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
the difference between fox and metaknight is that depending on who you ask, theres 1-4 characters in the same tier as fox. Theres nobody in the same tier as Mk, since hes that far above every other character in his game. fox is not like that.
What's your point? Those four characters overcentralize that game more than MK ever could.There would be more character diversity without those four characters in the game.
 

Ripple

ᗣᗣᗣᗣ ᗧ·····•·····
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
9,632
What's your point? Those four characters overcentralize that game more than MK ever could.There would be more character diversity without those four characters in the game.

I told you to stop posting about melee when clearly you have no idea about the metagame
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom