Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It appears that you are using ad block :'(
Hey, we get it. However this website is run by and for the community... and it needs ads in order to keep running.
Please disable your adblock on Smashboards, or go premium to hide all advertisements and this notice. Alternatively, this ad may have just failed to load. Woops!
Jebus, I guess, but 4 characters sharing a position of dominance is fine, you know? Plenty of successful competitive games have had less characters in their top tier than Melee does. Third Strike immediately comes to mind, with Chun-Li, Yun, and Ken being the undisputed best characters, for example.
.
.
.
Also, I know we drifted off the topic, but in regards to MK banned tournaments...
This. Also, would it not also be correct to say Silent is among this list of non fox users? He usually places quite well (not to mention the fan base he has) and I don't recall ever seeing him fox it up...Also, Scar would be mentionable. Both are great Falcon players, and I don't recall seeing them ever play Fox. They do decently whenever they do 1v1s, and they seem to usually dominate/play well in doubles....Why they no get mention? D:
Like they said, I think it was to point out top brawlers who play MK...which I don't think we were even discussing. The original point was he said all top melee use/used fox. We provided a list of those who did not. He countered....by asking what our list was while providing a list of top non mk users...Which I'm a lil confused as to how it's relevant to the 'melee' bit but w/e...
Like I said before...wasn't the original argument concerning your assumption that all top melee players used fox...? How did we get back to Brawl/MK/Non MK users in the top level...?
So not true. So very not true. Practically every top tier in melee still has their bad MUs, and far more even than true 'advantages'...Compare that to MK, which is your argument that they're as equally broken as him and well....it falls....short (God I love puns...)
I suppose so....A few problems though;
he said the fox thing as though it was finality, fact, and/or the end all/be all final truth....which it isn't.
Secondly, the difference between fox/mk being that fox, as far as I can recall, hasn't won 50% or so of all the money by himself in the last 3 years let alone the last 6....that means that fox being used to prove 'all top players use fox' or that 'melee has a similar situation' has far less impact for it's point (let alone the lack of truth involved in those statements) than a list of all those who play/played MK as a back up choice in brawl...Even if they second(ed) and/or mained/main fox, it's not nearly as big an advantage nor a 'guarantee' as it is to be a second/main of MK...Now if you argued fox/jiggs/falco/marth together as being the same/worse than MK, then maybe you'd have truth...but 4 against 1 is unfair, so we'd have to involve uh....snake, diddy...and I forget the 4th...anyway, we'd have to bring it to a 4 by 4 character comparison, and the numbers would still show a higher % of money won for the top 4 of brawl guaranteed to the top 4 of melee, I'm willing to bet MONEY on that. Period.
The inherent flaw(s) in the argument is that the top 8 characters in the melee tier still have more even/bad MUs comparatively to MK specifically, and in some ways even to some of the top 8 brawl; that means each 'top tier', while a strong and reliable sight, has far more weaknesses and isn't as horribly 'all *** kicking' as MK and/or the brawl's top 8 by comparison....
Also, the list of non fox using melee players, even in only recent years, is far larger than the list of non MK users in brawl...at the top levels, of course....(Probably attributable to the fact that there are so many mid/low tier counters to high tier picks in melee, compared to the lacking variety of mid/low tier CPs in brawl...Ergo, larger character variety and larger non fox list)
Finally, I feel I should point out the larger variety of character selection among top non fox users compared to the character variety among top non mk users, which I mentioned in parenthesis above....
i know esam (and nick riddle I think still as well) plays melee
and esam and nick are old school melee players lol. reflex is as well. and neo but I think most people knew that.
also dark peach....loooooooooooool
Jebus, I guess, but 4 characters sharing a position of dominance is fine, you know? Plenty of successful competitive games have had less characters in their top tier than Melee does. Third Strike immediately comes to mind, with Chun-Li, Yun, and Ken being the undisputed best characters, for example.
.
.
.
Also, I know we drifted off the topic, but in regards to MK banned tournaments...
@Grim: I meant the Eldin comment, not the Flossing one. Flossing ftw.
@Kid: depending on who you ask, MK is either in his own tier or simply the best in a tier with several other characters. Japan makes a good case for him having a neutral or worse matchup, as does europe. Just sayin'.
Why? just because one only has one and other other has four? If they overcentralize the game (which according to you guys, they do), then they should be banned
I don't advocate item play because I don't like the level of randomness it adds to the game, what does that have to do with LGLs?
I do think Bridge of Eldin should be legal (along with the majority of stages + FLoSSing) but I still don't understand the point you are trying to make here.
By removing items you've created the necessity for lgls, and yet complain about the lgls existence.
You complain about meta knights ability to abuse the current ruleset, yet removed the balancing tools inherently existent in the game and complain about attempts to fix the resulting imbalance.
Essentially you and those I described (inclusive of most of the URC) force the MK monster into existance, and then ask for him to be banned. Given two valid options you found the most ridiculous and nonsensical third option. If that isnt the perfect example of stupidity then no such example exists.
Why? just because one only has one and other other has four? If they overcentralize the game (which according to you guys, they do), then they should be banned
How don't they overcentralize the game? They get used more than any other character in any other tier combined and they make more than half of the money
@Eon The Wolf, I'm not saying that. It's just what I've seen and read
Just in Louisiana and Texas alone (where there are some pretty ****ing good people), MK is in no way dominant in terms of winning money or character usage %.
What?! The highest placing characters get the most money?! YOU DON'T SAY! STOP THE PRESSES! THIS MUST BE REPORTED ON!
----
Jebus - You said 'you ban one, you ban all'. You're the only one who said that. I haven't seen ANYONE else argue that.
-----------
Also, FYI....None of the characters in A/S in melee do as well solo as MK does...So your argument is flawed by saying all of S is equally borked, nor does arguing that 'a is borked cause it earns money too' help....
EDIT - or to put it simply....EACH CHARACTER, SOLO, EARNS A LITTLE BIT LESS THAN YOU'D EXPECT, ERGO MORE CHARACTERS HAVE A 'NOTABLE WIN %'...Compare that to brawl's 'top 8 have 9000000000000% of all wealth' <---(Warning, exaggeration. IIRC, it's something like 70-80%....right?), and you can see far more characters in melee win a notable % of all money compared to brawl....
How don't they overcentralize the game? They get used more than any other character in any other tier, combined and they make more than half of the money
What?! The highest placing characters get the most money?! YOU DON'T SAY! STOP THE PRESSES! THIS MUST BE REPORTED ON!
----
Jebus - You said 'you ban one, you ban all'. You're the only one who said that. I haven't seen ANYONE else argue that.
-----------
Also, FYI....None of the characters in A/S in melee do as well solo as MK does...So your argument is flawed by saying all of S is equally borked, nor does arguing that 'a is borked cause it earns money too' help....
EDIT - Okay so let me get this straight...you argue 'if you ban one S, you ban them all'. Yes? The next post, you said thats 'not what you said, it's what you've heard and seen'. Now you're arguing that it IS what you believe/say....? MAKE UP YOUR DAMN MIND.
I've never heard of fox being a MK counterpick, nor have I seen any foxes beat MK at the high level tournaments. Find me a link, and I'll concede/watch it...
As someone that played Melee for at least 3 years before Brawl and continues to do so on a regular basis in addition to playing Brawl:
There is so much more character diversity in Melee. Brawl is so polarized about which characters are good. Literally if you don't pick a top tier, you cannot win. Contrast this with Melee where alot of mid tiers can ****ing ****.
As someone that played Melee for at least 3 years before Brawl and continues to do so on a regular basis in addition to playing Brawl:
There is so much more character diversity in Melee. Brawl is so polarized about which characters are good. Literally if you don't pick a top tier, you cannot win. Contrast this with Melee where alot of mid tiers can ****ing ****.
maybe tyrant hasnt practiced in awhile cuz his main was banned
maybe tyrant was having a bad day
maybe tyrant was high as **** and couldn't tell where his character was
idk **** happens dude
not johning for the guy but you can't use 1 set as evidence that fox beats MK lol
I'm going to be completely honest with you and tell you that I saw Tyrant lose to Zeton's fox at WHOBO 3. With that said, a few videos and those matches change nothing about the fact that Metaknight destroys fox. I play Metaknight. Fox has no chance. xDD
maybe tyrant hasnt practiced in awhile cuz his main was banned
maybe tyrant was having a bad day
maybe tyrant was high as **** and couldn't tell where his character was
idk **** happens dude
not johning for the guy but you can't use 1 set as evidence that fox beats MK lol
MK is basically Uber (in the fact that he is banned) and any tournament that allows MK is basically an Ubers Tournament.
Japan plays Brawl and we play Brawl. We can do anything they can do and the MUs are the same as ours
And again, we come back to the issue that Japan's MKs do not play as ******y as NA MKs, to which you(Jebus) could only find ONE set out of the hundreds of videos of Japanese gameplay where a Japan MK actually did such a thing.
I need not remind you that "showing that you're the best" takes priority over "playing to win" in a metagame without prizes for money(outside of the really big tournies, if memory serves).
And again, we come back to the issue that Japan's MKs do not play as ******y as NA MKs, to which you(Jebus) could only find ONE set out of the hundreds of videos of Japanese gameplay where a Japan MK actually did such a thing.