I think it would just be nice if the MBR updated us every now and then on lists that they're working towards to let us know what we can expect for the future. This would add a little bit more transparency with communication, inform the community, spark threads, and overall not keep us totally in the dark.
Oh wait, isn't that what this thread is doing?
Seriously guys, if you don't like the privacy issue, you really need to obtain some logic. It really isn't that big of a deal. Umbreon posted this thread spelling out exactly what we can expect from the MBR. Why do we need everything to be so transparent. It's MUCH better if they can debate and argue for a while and we don't see it and then come up with something in the end that we can see.
Your professor doesn't watch you write a paper and analyze everything you're doing in addition to reading your final paper. It's stupid to have the professor just sit there and watch you write your paper if he can't give his two cents, which is exactly how it would be if we could see in the backroom. We wouldn't be able to post, so what's the point?
And it's already been covered why there is the need for the backroom in the first place. There are too many brain-dead idiots on here, as well as nubs who don't know what they're saying, so our input doesn't have the credentials the MBR has. It keeps things A LOT more organized.
As far as selection for the MBR goes, well, that's another story, but not really the topic people are debating. (Mogwai, you're an excellent poster who I think not only plays this game very well, but makes excellent posts and contributes a lot to the boards. If it were up to me, I'd put you in, but it's not.) I think PockyD is saying some VERY valid stuff though and feel like the debate between Mogwai and others is getting out of hand.
My understanding is that according to Umbreon, for example, people haven't learned to beat Jiggs because they're getting lazy and so the metagame hasn't gone anywhere. At first, people thought that Jiggs was a fluke and that players had merely not had enough practice in the match-up against jiggs. But now that it's years later, instead of saying we need a new tier list, we need to move jiggs up, the argument is that players still haven't learned the match-up and thus the metagame has not changed. I disagree and think the metagame has changed. You can watch it in Mango's playstyle (with any character) and how he plays differently than other players do. He makes himself very unpredictable because he is very aware of what he is doing and what the other character is doing. I noticed this a long time ago when watching videos and seeing him do moves that others would not normally do. For example, falco doing a down tilt against peach is dangerous because if you CC the downsmash you get *****, but Mango does it anyway. Another example is "randomly" throwing out a forward smash. It may LOOK random, but it's not because he is aware of how you are trying to approach him and he believes you are vulnerable to a smash attack. There are many more instances...rollouts with puff, ways of recoverying, but you get the idea. This is how Mango ***** so hard. Because he plays on another level. In other words, the metagame HAS advanced.
I would just like to take a moment to show my gratitude toward the MBR. I mean, I'm not ***-kissing or anything, it's just that a lot of people say a lot of negative things about the MBR and I appreciate their efforts to create an intelligent, well-thought set of rules and tier lists. Best of all, if you don't like what they have to say, you get to ignore them and do things your own way. OMG TOTALLY NO WAI BBQ