• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Granny, 72, Having A Baby With Her Grandson

IAmBlu3

Smash Champion
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
2,065
Location
southernplayalisticcadala
Just because it's different it's critisized.
I think that if this will make them happy, let them do it. It's their decision.
this kind of thinking scares. makes me wonder when people will start knocking down doors for beastiality. not comparing the two. just sayin...

gotta have a limit somewhere
 

Tacel

Smash Lord
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,616
Location
PA
this kind of thinking scares. makes me wonder when people will start knocking down doors for beastiality. not comparing the two. just sayin...

gotta have a limit somewhere
This whole thing is completely and horribly disgusting and pretty wrong, but I just think that if they're in love, they're in love and there is nothing that you can do about it.
 

Luigitoilet

shattering perfection
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 30, 2001
Messages
13,718
Location
secret room of wonder and despair
this kind of thinking scares. makes me wonder when people will start knocking down doors for beastiality. not comparing the two. just sayin...

gotta have a limit somewhere
I'm honestly not sure what point you're even making with this post but, while a limit is certainly necessary, I don't think incest should cross the legal line. Beastiality is always exploitation, but incestual sex isn't necessarily. If both relatives are of age, and practice protected sex , it should not be up to the law to decide anything. The problem only comes with procreating.

Also

This whole thing is completely and horribly disgusting and pretty wrong, but I just think that if they're in love, they're in love and there is nothing that you can do about it.
Stop being a fencesitter. Is it wrong or is it not wrong?
 

Tacel

Smash Lord
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,616
Location
PA
Stop being a fencesitter. Is it wrong or is it not wrong?
What I'm saying that what they are doing it unordinary, but we shouldn't descriminate them for loving each other.

I didn't think that I sounded so indecisive. I appologize.
 

Pikaville

Pikaville returns 10 years later.
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,900
Location
Kinsale, Ireland
[vomit] What an awful background this child will have. [/vomit]
My sentiments exactly.

This is just plain wrong.The child's mother will most likely be dead by the time it hits it's early teens.
I'm pretty opposed to this but if It makes them happy then.....who am I to judge.

So in short,yes it's wrong,but lots of stuff that makes people happy is.
 

1048576

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
3,417
wow.... and looking at the political spectrum (don't ask, my teacher made us study that), they aren't that far to the right to begin with :p

EDIT: So you're saying that you should kill the kid if he comes out stupid? Have you ever SEEN a video of a fetus while its being aborted? It actually fends for its life in there... that wouldn't be right bro.

Also, being bad at math isn't a problem. If you're bad at math, it just means you have no aptitude with numbers. Take me, I'm horrible at math, but it isn't a problem as if you had a deformity (I have no idea what hemophilia is) and that would mean that the person has an aptitude for something else, like I'm more of an artistic type.
No, no it doesn't. It wiggles. That's different.
The abortion debate is way too complex to resove in the smashboards pool room, so I'm basically figuring that it's okay for these people to get an abortion if the society they live in deems it okay, which I'm guessing it does.

Being bad at math is a problem. There's no positive side to not being able to think logically. It's not like being better at math makes you worse at art or something. Like, if you learned calculus, you wouldn't stop being able to think creatively.

I don't think it's consistent to have a problem with this couple procreating (assuming the risk of disorder is significant) but then turn around and claim it's okay for stupid or weak people to procreate. I'd say the latter is much, much worse.
 

Pikaville

Pikaville returns 10 years later.
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,900
Location
Kinsale, Ireland
No, no it doesn't. It wiggles. That's different.
The abortion debate is way too complex to resove in the smashboards pool room, so I'm basically figuring that it's okay for these people to get an abortion if the society they live in deems it okay, which I'm guessing it does.

Being bad at math is a problem. There's no positive side to not being able to think logically. It's not like being better at math makes you worse at art or something. Like, if you learned calculus, you wouldn't stop being able to think creatively.

I don't think it's consistent to have a problem with this couple procreating (assuming the risk of disorder is significant) but then turn around and claim it's okay for stupid or weak people to procreate. I'd say the latter is much, much worse.
Agreed times 100000000.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
It's not the parent's fault that the kid will have it rough.

All of these "society will see it as bad so they're selfish" arguments can be used to prevent interracial couples from having children as well, or hell even people with big ears shouldn't have kids according to this line of reasoning.

It's a bad argument.
It is the parents' fault.

They are choosing to put the child into a bad situation, I don't see how it could be anyone else's fault.

It isn't bad because society will see it as bad, it's bad because they're putting their child into bad circumstances.
 

Fuelbi

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
16,894
Location
Also PIPA and CISPA
It is the parents' fault.

They are choosing to put the child into a bad situation, I don't see how it could be anyone else's fault.

It isn't bad because society will see it as bad, it's bad because they're putting their child into bad circumstances.
Exactly what I've been trying to explain.
 

BBQTV

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
4,000
oh boy i cant wait for this news to get to 4chan and encyclopedia dramatica. do you know what this guy did? he mixed granny fetish with incest now pornsites are gonna be made for people who get off on both
 

gm jack

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
1,850
Location
Reading/Cambridge, UK
Come on, that almost certainly exists already.

As for the situation, it's really pretty rough. Seriously, don't you have some sort of incest laws?
 

Fuelbi

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
16,894
Location
Also PIPA and CISPA
I'm guessing we don't have an incest law mostly because it's immoral in the eyes of most of the population thus eliminating the need to waste time making an unnecessary law.
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
I'm guessing we don't have an incest law mostly because it's immoral in the eyes of most of the population thus eliminating the need to waste time making an unnecessary law.
I'm guessing we don't have a law on murder mostly because it's immoral in the eyes of most of the population thus eliminating the need to waste time making an unnecessary law.

..

....

........

................wait................
 

GOD!

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
778
Location
Rome, GA
Guys, you are just being close minded. If they want to have a child together then let them have a child, and check your stupid archaic morality at the door.

Plz guys, get with the 2010 moral metagame. Morality is just made up by religious people to be bigots.
 

Fuelbi

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
16,894
Location
Also PIPA and CISPA
I'm just saying, would you make a law that mostly everybody was against?


Would you make a law on murder? No because it's an unspoken rule that YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KILL ANYONE
 

Near²

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
132
I'm just saying, would you make a law that mostly everybody was against?


Would you make a law on murder? No because it's an unspoken rule that YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KILL ANYONE
I'd still make a law
 

global-wolf

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
2,215
Location
Northern Virginia
I'm just saying, would you make a law that mostly everybody was against?


Would you make a law on murder? No because it's an unspoken rule that YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KILL ANYONE
So you're saying laws on murder can be removed without any consequences? ._.

I agree with Luigitoilet.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
I'm just saying, would you make a law that mostly everybody was against?


Would you make a law on murder? No because it's an unspoken rule that YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KILL ANYONE
Are you, like, trolling or something?

I agree with Luigitoilet, use logic please. I don't know what kind of la-la-land you live in, but people in this day and age don't really give a **** about morals.

Also, if everyone were against a certain law, it wouldn't get made since you need votes to pass laws...

>_>
 

BBQTV

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
4,000
I'm just saying, would you make a law that mostly everybody was against?


Would you make a law on murder? No because it's an unspoken rule that YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KILL ANYONE
this is the same as me saying i dont need to raise an OBJECTION! because of the amount of ignorance with your post
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
From the article:
Her lover is the son of Pearl's daughter Lynette Bailey - who she put up for adoption when she was 18-years-old.

When his mother passed away, Phil tracked down his long lost grandmother and they quickly fell in love.
I guess it's not so...uh, strange if you take that into account. They were strangers when they met, so it wasn't as if they had a grandparent-grandchild relationship to begin with.

Omg... I can't imagine how this could turn
out well. But good luck to them, I suppose. >.>
Yeah. I guess that's the best way to look at it. I don't care about the incest (really), but do they really need to have a kid together? They could just adopt. Genetic diseases have a high occurrence when the parents are so closely related.
 

Grandeza

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
4,035
Location
Brooklyn,New York
Yeah. I guess that's the best way to look at it. I don't care about the incest (really), but do they really need to have a kid together? They could just adopt. Genetic diseases have a high occurrence when the parents are so closely related.
They're going through a surrogate. It's not related to the grandmother as she's certainly too old to have viable eggs.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong ._.
 

~N9NE~

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
3,140
Location
London
NNID
LondonAssyrian
Why is he looking at him like that?
No clue at all but my theory is the guy that is about to sit down just revealed he is having a child with the grandmother of the guy behind him.
 

Tacel

Smash Lord
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,616
Location
PA
YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KILL ANYONE
Sig'd.

Anyway, laws don't stop people from doing anything. Laws just put consequences to actions. People still don't listen. People are stupid.
Just watch the news. You hear about murder, ****, kidnapping, thieving, and more all of the time.

So, would a law stop anything? Would it even pass?
Probably not.
 

Luigitoilet

shattering perfection
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 30, 2001
Messages
13,718
Location
secret room of wonder and despair
Sig'd.

Anyway, laws don't stop people from doing anything. Laws just put consequences to actions. People still don't listen. People are stupid.
Just watch the news. You hear about murder, ****, kidnapping, thieving, and more all of the time.

So, would a law stop anything? Would it even pass?
Probably not.
So you mean to say there should be no laws because some people break them anyways?
 
Top Bottom