- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 7,190
Incest is the best, it puts your grandson to the test.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
We're living in a society where people are healthier (Unless you count Africa), people live longer, and lives are better. Back in the 18th century, most people died before reaching forty years old. Today, the only two countries that follow this as a rule instead of the exception are Zambia and Zimbabwe (Correct me if I'm wrong) and they are some of the world's poorest nations.
However, this is the United State of America. We are healthier then ever, live until the mid-70s on average, and we live better lives.
What does that do to relate to this? It helps extend the childbearing years of mothers. Sooner or later, depending if fat foods and laziness doesn't drag us down eventually, don't be surprise if people will eventually have a lot longer childbearing years. It won't happen anytime soon, but don't be surprise if people in early 70s eventually start having kids without problems.
lrn2r eadThe pair paid $54,000 (£35,000) to find a surrogate mother and buy a donor egg to inseminate with Phil's sperm.
I'm pretty sure he addressed everything you said man.To everyone who thinks I just got owned: he basically said the same thing I said plus more.. and he still never reneged on calling strength a trait... and wait its not!
But yeah just look at the wall of words that don't address anything I brought against him and be amazed. I'll go read some more of my chemistry and kinesiology books while this guy pulls you unrelated stuff from google.
Wonder if the meat has something in it that makes humans superhuman.A much more obvious example of inheriting strength is Belgian Blue cattle. They have two faulty copies of the gene that regulates muscle growth. As a result, their bulls can easily be over a ton.
![]()
It is done in animal breeding a lot, where the biggest bulls with the best defined muscles are selected to breed as the offspring as more likely to have lots of muscle. Now, diet and exercise is obviously important, but genetics are a huge part of it.
...seriously?To everyone who thinks I just got owned: he basically said the same thing I said plus more.. and he still never reneged on calling strength a trait... and wait its not!
I think pugs are the best example of that, myselfThey're actually my favourite domestic dog, but they're pretty pathetic specimens biologically speaking.
They're perpetually out of breath, can barely walk, and need a c-section to be delivered because their heads are too big to fit out of mama bulldog's vag.
Since you don't like lots of text, here it is in simpler format:The whole wall of text doesn't even address the debate anyway. Who cares he's wrong, everyone knows that strength is influenced by a thousand things and is therefor not a "heritable trait." Except for kids like GS. That's the point, address it or move on.
True but I'm English so the Bulldog is the first image that pops into my head when I think pedigree.I think pugs are the best example of that, myself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckiKdk4TwR4&feature=channel
Oh lord, it's Tony Abbot!
Would definitely love to see a pedigree human.
Oh wait I know what one looks like
![]()
You are utterly obtuse for suggesting that.Sample size of one should not be a convincing argument.
I'm sure I could find a ****ed up person/animal who wasn't the result of inbreeding. We still don't know the rate at which it occurs.
They were never coolWell hey thalidomide babies are cool too, until they end up coming out of your wife.
A shallow genepool also exaggerates useful attributes (profects?) You still haven't shown how much the rate of ****** increases with you inbreed. It matters whether it's like 3% or 30%. Cost vs benefit and all that.You are utterly obtuse for suggesting that.
It's an obvious fact of statistics that a shallow genepool exaggerates defects. In fact, let's not even talk human since the basic idea applies to all animals.
Pedigree dogs don't live as long as mongrels. Why? Hybrid vigour. Suggesting? Better genepool that produces the puppies. In fact, the definition of an endangered species can also be one with a very shallow genepool.
Of course I could be wrong about all this but okay go ahead and test it for me. Prove me wrong. Sleep with your mother until you get a girl. Then sleep with your daughter/sister? If she has a son make her sleep with him, if she has a daughter well go for the honours.
Does that idea repulse you? Well it's part of your inbuilt instinctive behaviour telling you not to inbreed.
Although you should do it anyway in the name of science.
You know this is why people stopped believing in you.To everyone who thinks I just got owned: he basically said the same thing I said plus more.. and he still never reneged on calling strength a trait... and wait its not!
But yeah just look at the wall of words that don't address anything I brought against him and be amazed. I'll go read some more of my chemistry and kinesiology books while this guy pulls you unrelated stuff from google.
I don't deny it, but the funny thing about that observation is that one of those two examples is listed as an endangered or protected species, and the other is doing very well for itself.Inbreeding gets you from this:
![]()
to this:
![]()
Yes, and that has to do with what I mentioned above. A population can experience different selection pressures over time, and that changes which traits are "strong" and which are "weak". Mental *********** and cancer haven't stopped human beings from reaching over 6 billion in number. Small scale inbreeding isn't likely to throw the species to the brink of extinction either. Neither homosexuality, nor other forms of sexuality that lead to decreased vitality or which don't lead to procreation at all--not even the expansion of the roles of women beyond that of the primary caregivers of children--is going to stop the human birth machine. We don't always live well, but there are so god**** many of us. The alterations we've made to our environment have altered the selection pressures acting on us. Certain traits that would have been detrimental in the past are no longer as detrimental as they once were.The problem comes that people have no problem with ******* or colorblind or cancer-prone people breeding, which leaves the kid much, much worse off.
I guess metapause hasn't hit her yet.No way is that possible.
She's way too old to even produce children.
You realize that this is why the sky is pink.You know this is why people stopped believing in you.
Ya it's his, you don't see anything wrong with that?lol at this thread. Chill people, it's not your grandmother he's nailing.
Of course I think it's wrong. Why would I have posted it lol.Ya it's his, you don't see anything wrong with that?
We can't stop them, but it's just one more example of the messed up world we live in.Of course I think it's wrong. Why would I have posted it lol.
Can I stop him? Should I really get worked up about it?
****ing **** **** **** ***** **** ****
******* piss ******s ****ing **** with a bottle of toothpaste
There is nothing "messed up" about their relationship.
Of course I think it's wrong. Why would I have posted it lol.
People can have opinions.Chill people