Boofy!
Smash Champion
When you put it like that it sounds like I'd want AD over armor pen all the time.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Does this explain why Sorc Shoes are especially good earlyish game, since champs generally have only like 30-40 MR around that time?The principle is pretty straightforward.
Say we have 25 ArPen.
Vs. a target with 25 Armor, we're going from a 20% damage reduction to a 0% damage reduction, which represents a 25% increase in damage output.
Vs. a target with 100 Armor, we're going from a 50% damage reduction to a 42.9% damage reduction, which represents a 14.3% increase in damage.
Vs. a target with 200 Armor, we're going from a 66.7% damage reduction to a 63.6%% damage reduction, which represents a 9.1% increase in damage.
Ye sDoes this explain why Sorc Shoes are especially good earlyish game, since champs generally have only like 30-40 MR around that time?
Well, more than that with runes and stuff, but still.
You don't? Teemo sucks vs. AD nukers with gap closers, it's a bad matchup.How do you beat Wukong solo top with Teemo?
I dunno mang, I just can't seem to lose with Pantheon in solo queue recently. Dphat's Taric going balls deep on everyone sure helped though, lol.I saw that pantheon yesterday. Dumping on everything.
Yes, but those numbers mean absolutely nothing to me without a comparison to damage output with AD as opposed to ArPen.The principle is pretty straightforward.
Say we have 25 ArPen.
Vs. a target with 25 Armor, we're going from a 20% damage reduction to a 0% damage reduction, which represents a 25% increase in damage output.
Vs. a target with 100 Armor, we're going from a 50% damage reduction to a 42.9% damage reduction, which represents a 14.3% increase in damage.
Vs. a target with 200 Armor, we're going from a 66.7% damage reduction to a 63.6%% damage reduction, which represents a 9.1% increase in damage.
That's not the point I was making. I was pointing out that flat ArPen is more effective vs. lower Armor targets than it is vs. higher Armor targets.Yes, but those numbers mean absolutely nothing to me without a comparison to damage output with AD as opposed to ArPen.
Well, yeah. It's a little common sense. If you give it no other context then, hurr, you're gonna deal more damage to units with low armor than high armor otherwise armor wouldn't be worth building.That's not the point I was making. I was pointing out that flat ArPen is more effective vs. lower Armor targets than it is vs. higher Armor targets.
The AD vs. ArPen conversation is more complicated because of all sorts of variables throughout the game. And frankly, no one pays me to theorycraft LoL stuff, so it's not really worth my time to crunch all sorts of numbers on it unless I directly care about it, which, in the case of Riven, is not the case.
Again you're missing the point of that information. You are busting my balls because I wasn't talking about what you're talking about. You're changing the subject of the conversation back to ArPen vs. AD, rather than when ArPen is at it's best, which is all I was talking about.Well, yeah. It's a little common sense. If you give it no other context then, hurr, you're gonna deal more damage to units with low armor than high armor otherwise armor wouldn't be worth building.
I'm exaggerating it's uselessness, but without some context to put it in and a conclusion to draw from it, you don't give much meaningful information.
I say this, not primarily to bust your balls, but because, in the context of the conversation, it's misleading. It makes it seem like you're putting these numbers out in support of ArPen being better than AD. When the data you presented doesn't reach that conclusion.
I get that you don't do League themed mathematics as a hobby. Neither do I, it's why I ask, but give me something to do with this information. At what point would you recommend armor pen and at what attack damage in a build? Say I've got a choice between a second Bloodthirster and Last Whisper. Give me an idea of when ArPen matters more than AD and vice versa. Not specific situations, that's my judgement call based on information I'm hoping to acquire.
Which is a misinformed assertion because ArPen Reds/Quints are at their best vs. targets with low armor, not high armor, which is what I was proving with those numbers because they're straightforward and simple and I've had to explain this **** thousands of times to new players who don't understand how Penetration works. Nothing more. You want to draw conclusions about the comparison with AD, you run the numbers. I on the other hand, was merely pointing out that flat ArPen is at it's best vs. low Armor targets and giving easy numbers to back it.You want flat AD against most matchups, but against champs that like to grab early armor/tankiness and such I go the ArPen reds/quints.
We are complete oppositesI now own an AD champ... it's Urgot (trolololol).
I read every single S2J post in this thread.But no one cares what s2j says.
who doesn't care what s2j says?But no one cares what s2j says.
NOPe incorrect my word is lawCorki is top 3 imo.