Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
CoolRegardless of your stance on his legality, Chuee, you cannot deny that he, at the very least, deserves a re-evaluation of his character as a whole.
A lot of things have changed since the last ban vote, and he definitely needs to be looked at again.
Stop trying to be cool and try posting intelligent **** for once. This is the reason many other Meta Knight threads are locked, my friend - idiocy.Cool
but he won't be banneddddddddddddd
that's all part of his plan <.< >.>Stop trying to be cool and try posting intelligent **** for once. This is the reason many other Meta Knight threads are locked, my friend - idiocy.
Also note, if we wait even longer for some reason, the gap's just going to get bigger. Snake has been falling farther and farther and yet farther behind MK, and no one else is really catching up to snake.Just add to the list, guys:
- MK has won about 45% of all tournament money in 2011 so far, which is an increase of 15% since the last ban vote.
- MK has 118 different users who have won at least $20 with him(<$20 isn't significant), while Snake only has 44 such users.
as would tink/peach/D3Maybe Marth becomes relevant with an MK ban.
It's trueMarth will still suck.
To be fair, Diddy and Snake could arguably have no disadvantaged MUs with MK banned but meh.Snake and Diddy simply do not have that and it's already apparent in our current metagame. The Unity Ruleset has even somewhat justified that Metaknight alters the game by implementing the specific LGL on him. Yet they ban Pictochat (a stage that is highly used by Diddies, Falcos, and Snakes), which really doesn't help anyone but Metaknight out at all.
Are you serious?To be fair, Diddy and Snake could arguably have no disadvantaged MUs with MK banned but meh.
That's why I said arguably.Are you serious?
This isn't even going off of the Brawl Back Room Matchup Chart (which would list MUCH more), just my opinion on where I think the current metagame stands.
has FOUR characters that beat him: and
has THREE characters that go even with him: and
has TWO characters that beat him: and
has SIX characters that go even with him: and
Oh... I see...John#s, I wouldn't necessarily say this is a "legitimate" thread for such a discussion, but as far as I am aware no rule is being explicitly broken. I don't even moderate this part of SWF lol, just doing what I can to prevent trouble and encourage healthy discussion, y'know?
EDIT: Basically, I haven't talked to anyone else on the staff about this, I'm just going with previous rulings on the issue afaik. Not like anything here is under my jurisdiction anyways
I don't know about marth but I've heard both Atomsk and coney say D3 doesn't win.Everyone in their right mind knows that and easily beat .
the same goes for and beating
Oops, I was thinking of 50% of 30%, but even then, numbers aren't exactly static.Uh, San, I like all of the points you made in that post, but in the last line, it's 30% to 45%, and it's a 15% increase...
Oh, now I see it, lulz. Typing percentages and phrasing them to not be confusing is hard, so don't worry about it. "Increased by 15% from 30% to 45%" sounds about right.Oops, I was thinking of 50% of 30%, but even then, numbers aren't exactly static.
Increased 15% to 45% should have been written increased by 15% from 30% to 45% to be more clear.
also, those two can't be pocketed to protect you from all CPs, and they can't CP you to a stage heavily in their favor comparable to MK/brinstar.regardless of what it is. neither diddy nor Snake go 6-4 or better with most of the roster while everyone knows the matchup retardedly well. with MK gone people will start learning the diddy and snake matchup... but even now they don't demolish everything that isn't MK.