#1Cheese, I'm really curious to see you play. You make it pretty obvious you know what you're talking about when you talk and you have a great thinking mindset for the game.
As I said. Curious.
Well everyone says that about Niddo and we all know how good he is. Lol jk Niddo.
As for this whole Samus Vs. Ike arguement, it doesn't really matter what the matchup numbers are because either side can win in any situation. The numbers just show based off of the character's abilities what side is likely to win but that doesn't mean that Ike
Can't win. It just means it will be a more difficult game to play, like i said the numbers just represent who is likely to win, some people the matchup may be difficult but others the matchup might seem simple to them.
Like for example, some people are comfortable with the Ike vs. Falco/Olimar/D3/Snake/MK matchups. The games aren't in their favor but they seem to do particularly well against those players and sometimes win. All in all it comes down to who wins, If all games were decided by the matchup numbers then there would be no need to play, but we play because Ike CAN still beat Samus, or Snake, or Olimar, or whoever. That doesn't necessarily mean the opposing player is bad, but just outplayed, and it happens. So you can name the matchup 8-2 for all i care but it all comes down to who actually wins.
Samus Vs. Ike I believe is difficult mainly due to projectiles. It is very difficult to avoid everything when you are in that kind of situation, as much as you believe you can perfect shield everything, Light, you can't. You will find out at Whobo2 if you play Xyro because the matchup is difficult. It is still managable but it can go both ways, whenever me and Xyro play it goes both ways all the time, I'll **** him, then he will go super Samus and **** me next round, granted it is friendlies. So the matchup isn't THAT unmanagable, the way I see it. I would probably put it 6-4 although Xyro gives very good points most of them are related. 65-35 is putting it a little over considering your posting all these reasons why Samus is better but what you don't seem to consider is that Ike isn't a ragdoll, we can do some stuff as well. You act as though the matchup is completely unwinnable and with all the points you give you should be able to, in theory, 3-stock any Ike you play, that is how it sounds like to me.
I guess that is all for now, can't think of anythhing else to say at the moment, so we will see how this plays out over the next few posts lol.