• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

2013 Community Tier List

Kadano

Magical Express
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Messages
2,160
Location
Vienna, Austria
I don’t understand. This isn’t stickied, but the old 2010 tier list still is. So I guess this doesn’t replace it but rather serves as a community survey? Please clarify. In the op, it says something about “official” results, so there are contradicting indicators.
 

TKD+ITA+Mar=

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
951
Location
San Diego
Sveet, how did you determine where to split the tiers? There is a 2 point gap between Peach and CF, but only a .9 gap between ICs and Doc. So why is that where the division takes place?
 

goateeguy

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
795
Location
right behind you
I actually like this tier list quite a bit. I thought making a popular vote of it was going to skew everything but I think this reflects what we've been seeing recently.
 

Shadic

Alakadoof?
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
5,695
Location
Olympia, WA
NNID
Shadoof
I think the S tier should end after Peach - The difference in viability between her and Falcon is huge, imo. (And 5.11 to 7.0 is one of the largest gaps in the rankings.)
 

Fortress | Sveet

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
16,256
Location
Northern IL
Voting variance isn't the most important thing when determining a tier division. The top 8 characters haven't been in danger of moving below the top 8 since before brawl was released. A sub-tier could be made for ICs and Falcon alone, but that would necessarily lead to other minor divisions (such as fox/falco tier) which is not very helpful information. Higher level players are welcome to talk about the game in terms of smaller tiers, but this list is primarily for newer players to see quickly and decisively which characters are viable and which aren't.
 

FourStar

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
887
Location
NOR CAL
He didn't use my list obviously, but I saw it coming. Yoshi's got talent, it's just not easy to tap into.
he's very under represented so until we see more from yoshi mains other than Vectorman and aMsa (as of recent) idk if he's that good. yeah he should move up but not three spots IMO
 

TKD+ITA+Mar=

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
951
Location
San Diego
Voting variance isn't the most important thing when determining a tier division. The top 8 characters haven't been in danger of moving below the top 8 since before brawl was released. A sub-tier could be made for ICs and Falcon alone, but that would necessarily lead to other minor divisions (such as fox/falco tier) which is not very helpful information. Higher level players are welcome to talk about the game in terms of smaller tiers, but this list is primarily for newer players to see quickly and decisively which characters are viable and which aren't.

But doesn't that make the segmentation sort of arbitrary? I understand what you're saying, but it seems sort of against the notion of a tierlist in the first place. Perhaps the best compromise is to make subtiers? Like S+ is Fox/Falco, S is Sheik, Marth, Puff, Peach, S- is CF, ICs. That way would be more numerically representative, while allowing newer players to easily determine which characters are viable or not.
 

Aenglaan

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
184
Location
United States
NNID
Aenglaan
3DS FC
0559-8074-9911
Interesting to see that Jiggilypuff has fallen down behind Sheik and Marth. Maybe people are adapting to her spacing and air attacks.

I'm also a little surprised that Ganondorf fell down 2 points on the list.
 

Eternal Yoshi

I've covered ban wars, you know
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
5,450
Location
Playing different games
NNID
EternalYoshi
3DS FC
3394-4459-7089
Kirby has rightfully earned his place at the bottom of the bottom.
About time everyone else knows that Pichu > Kirby.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
1,126
Location
Boise, ID
NNID
dansalvato
edit: Nvm, Sveet addressed this above.

By the way, though, I'm super glad Young Link is above Link in this list. I feel that although nobody has really unlocked his potential, it's there and he seriously has the tools to outclass Link. They have similar weaknesses but YL has far more strengths to make up for it.
 

EdreesesPieces

Smash Bros Before Hos
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
7,680
Location
confirmed, sending supplies.
NNID
EdreesesPieces
Now, I haven't looked at a Melee tier list in like 4 years, and this is probably way late, but I've been telling everyone for about 9 years now that Young Link was better than Link, and it finally caught up....at least on this results poll. lol.
 

stickmantankguy

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
23
Location
New Jersey
Ness should not be in the "Leave them alone tier." He has a lot of potential, as does Yoshi, which is why Yoshi is rising. The tier list is all about a character's potential, and Ness has tons of potential. Pichu and Kirby have pretty much no potential, and Bowser has only a little bit. But Ness can do so much bs.

I understand that he isn't a character to play when you first start playing, but that doesn't mean that a new player "should leave him alone."

When Ness goes up in the tiers, if it ever happens, I believe that Roy should take his place in the negligible tier. Because unlike ALL the other low tier characters, he is a clone of an S-tier, and therefore has a hefty amount of anti-metagame developed. Every step we take in learning how to counter Marth's bull**** is a step we take in learning how to counter Roy. He is more unusable than Bowser at this point. Dj Nintendo has even shown that Bowser is playable. People have tried playing Roy, and have given up in the process.
 

Divinokage

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
16,250
Location
Montreal, Quebec
Ness should not be in the "Leave them alone tier." He has a lot of potential, as does Yoshi, which is why Yoshi is rising. The tier list is all about a character's potential, and Ness has tons of potential. Pichu and Kirby have pretty much no potential, and Bowser has only a little bit. But Ness can do so much bs.

I understand that he isn't a character to play when you first start playing, but that doesn't mean that a new player "should leave him alone."

When Ness goes up in the tiers, if it ever happens, I believe that Roy should take his place in the negligible tier. Because unlike ALL the other low tier characters, he is a clone of an S-tier, and therefore has a hefty amount of anti-metagame developed. Every step we take in learning how to counter Marth's bull**** is a step we take in learning how to counter Roy. He is more unusable than Bowser at this point. Dj Nintendo has even shown that Bowser is playable. People have tried playing Roy, and have given up in the process.
You pretty much said nothing about why you think Ness has potential along with Yoshi. Go on. At least it's been proven somewhat that Yoshi can do something in the right hands with his unique tools unlike any character. Ness however... lol.

If you rely on a feel that you think he has more potential then, that's where it ends. If not, prove it, simple.
 

HugS™

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
1,486
Location
DBR
Puff is fine, should possibly be lower than peach. All this hype over a character that that works mostly dependently on the mistakes of the opponent shouldn't have had the 3rd place honor to begin with. Still a strong, viable character though.
 

stickmantankguy

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
23
Location
New Jersey
You pretty much said nothing about why you think Ness has potential along with Yoshi. Go on. At least it's been proven somewhat that Yoshi can do something in the right hands with his unique tools unlike any character. Ness however... lol.

If you rely on a feel that you think he has more potential then, that's where it ends. If not, prove it, simple.

Ness's DJC aerials allows for a very manipulative mindgame, due to how fast they seem to come out. Used in conjunction with his sweetspotted bair, his nair, his janky fair, or his uair, he can throw them out like it's nothing. The yoyo-glitch is also why Ness actually has potential. There aren't many who've gotten good at using the yoyo-glitch in high level play, but some have gotten there. Such as The Mofo, he is a crazy good Ness player, and if there is anyone who really understands Ness's potential, it's him. Ness's groundgame is poor, but a well timed tipper with the bat can really do some knockback.

Ness has a really unique style (and a **** recovery), which is why I compare him to Yoshi, and that is also why I believe that Roy is worse.
Sorry about that last post. I felt more compelled to explain my reasoning for Roy's inevitable decline than my reasoning for Ness's potential.

(I've also read things about the super yoyo-glitch and teleporting but I haven't been able to find anything about that)
 

TheBakonBitz

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
237
Someone please explain why this tier list isn't a bunch of crap. All of your so called top tier characters are the top 8 in Evo. Seems like you people just take the winners from the most recent tournament and slap it on a word document.
 

pidgezero_one

((((((((((( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) gotta go fast!
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
4,458
Location
Toronto
NNID
pidgezero_one
3DS FC
3222-5601-4071
I thought that was how you were supposed to do it
 

Circa

Smash Champion
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
2,874
Location
Three Rivers, MI
NNID
timssu
3DS FC
1891-2120-4792
When Ness goes up in the tiers, if it ever happens, I believe that Roy should take his place in the negligible tier. Because unlike ALL the other low tier characters, he is a clone of an S-tier, and therefore has a hefty amount of anti-metagame developed. Every step we take in learning how to counter Marth's bull**** is a step we take in learning how to counter Roy. He is more unusable than Bowser at this point. Dj Nintendo has even shown that Bowser is playable. People have tried playing Roy, and have given up in the process.
Your logic on Roy going lower doesn't really make sense, actually. Having similar hitboxes on all your moves =/= being the same as your clone. Nearly everything about them outside of their hitboxes are different, and this makes the two of them play in very different ways.

Your argument about Roy also collapses when you think about the fact that Marth has been a dominant character since this game started being played competitively, and as such we technically would have had Roy's metagame pretty much figured out and countered years ago. If this were the case, then Roy would have been garbage tier a long time ago.

Despite what I stated previously about AZ dropping Roy and what that could mean, I don't actually think he's complete ass tier. Just thought I'd point that out. I think Roy's biggest problem is just that he hasn't had anyone truly dedicated to pushing what he can do in quite some time. This is actually a problem with a lot of low tiers.

I don't agree that Ness should be higher (it's yet to be proven by anyone that he deserves better placement), but I do agree that he shouldn't be in the "Don't touch this" tier. That ranking should only exist for Pichu and Kirby if you ask me.
 

Mogwai

Smash Gizmo
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
10,449
Location
I want to expect better of you, but I know not to
Someone please explain why this tier list isn't a bunch of crap. All of your so called top tier characters are the top 8 in Evo. Seems like you people just take the winners from the most recent tournament and slap it on a word document.
Yea, it sure seems to be a huge contradiction to me too. A tier list is trying to list the best characters in the game, so why the girl would people using the best characters in the game be the same ones doing well at a tournament!? That doesn't make any sense. Pure logical fallacy right there, shut it down Sveet, reason has defeated your attempts to brainwash the community.
 

stickmantankguy

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
23
Location
New Jersey
Someone please explain why this tier list isn't a bunch of crap. All of your so called top tier characters are the top 8 in Evo. Seems like you people just take the winners from the most recent tournament and slap it on a word document.

Let me start by saying Mango won EVO 2013. Mango is the best fox in the world by far. But Mango is NOT the reason why fox is #1 on the tier list. He is the reason why fox should stay #1 on the tier list. The Tier list is all about the potential of a character and how well he or she could do in the competitive environment. Lot's of people still think that Shiek and Marth should be the top because of their "spammy" attributes. Just because they're easy on a lower level of play, doesn't mean they're the best. Fox and Falco, albeit the best characters in the game, require plenty skill to play well. Trust us when we say that the Tier list is a reliable one. I for one would make some tweaks to the bottom and mid area of the list, just because of my opinions on some characters and how the play and blah blah blah.

tl:dr
The list is based on the amount of potential each character holds in tournament play.
Hope I helped! :foxmelee: :falcomelee:
 

stickmantankguy

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
23
Location
New Jersey
Your logic on Roy going lower doesn't really make sense, actually. Having similar hitboxes on all your moves =/= being the same as your clone. Nearly everything about them outside of their hitboxes are different, and this makes the two of them play in very different ways.

Your argument about Roy also collapses when you think about the fact that Marth has been a dominant character since this game started being played competitively, and as such we technically would have had Roy's metagame pretty much figured out and countered years ago. If this were the case, then Roy would have been garbage tier a long time ago.

Despite what I stated previously about AZ dropping Roy and what that could mean, I don't actually think he's complete *** tier. Just thought I'd point that out. I think Roy's biggest problem is just that he hasn't had anyone truly dedicated to pushing what he can do in quite some time. This is actually a problem with a lot of low tiers.

I don't agree that Ness should be higher (it's yet to be proven by anyone that he deserves better placement), but I do agree that he shouldn't be in the "Don't touch this" tier. That ranking should only exist for Pichu and Kirby if you ask me.

Well put. Perhaps I may just be a litttttle bit biased towards Ness :D
We need more low tier mains! :nessmelee:

EDIT: oh jeez I didn't mean to double post ;_;
 

Fortress | Sveet

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
16,256
Location
Northern IL
But doesn't that make the segmentation sort of arbitrary? I understand what you're saying, but it seems sort of against the notion of a tierlist in the first place. Perhaps the best compromise is to make subtiers? Like S+ is Fox/Falco, S is Sheik, Marth, Puff, Peach, S- is CF, ICs. That way would be more numerically representative, while allowing newer players to easily determine which characters are viable or not.
Keep in mind that tier lists are mostly arbitrary to begin with. The point is to express a certain amount of information about the competitive metagame quickly and effectively. Adding more tiers would satisfy the statisticians, but ultimately it would serve to confuse the target audience. If you have the capability to read deeper into the data, feel free. If youre interested in other things (standard devations, etc) pm me (this goes for anybody)
 

TheBakonBitz

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
237
He is the reason why fox should stay #1 on the tier list.
The Tier list is all about the potential of a character and how well he or she could do in the competitive environment.
The list is based on the amount of potential each character holds in tournament play.
Trust us when we say that the Tier list is a reliable one.
So it's based all on the latest tournament and nothing else. Thanks for backing up what I just said when I stated it's a bunch of garbage.
 

MaNg0

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
5,032
Location
Norwalk
I hate these tier list things

The tier list is

Mango armada m2k pp = any character they choose to play

hboxs puff


All the characters that are above Dr have all the tools to win and lots of weaknesses

Just because its harder to win with some of the characters shouldnt affect how good of

a character of it is. If the tools they have to win are there then they can make it happen

regardless of difficulty. I prob have the most experience playing a lot of the top tiers. Ive

had moments with each top tier where im like omg how does this character lose. and ive had moments

wheres its like oh yeah thats why.EVEN WITH FALCON ( falcon is broken all the falcons just suck

LMAOOO except s2j <3 ) Ive even been playing peach to understand her better

as a character and shes amazing. THEYRE ALL AMAZING BECAUSE MELEE IS AMAZING
 
Top Bottom