Would you pay to make Wifi Better?

[King Funk]

I paid Nintendo for my Wii... Why should I pay for better Wi-Fi? It's their job!

 

[Lord Viper]

I paid Nintendo for my Wii... Why should I pay for better Wi-Fi? It's their job!

☆ LAMO, that's like saying I paid for my computer and why do I have to pay internet, (then again, I hear Japan don't have to pay for they're internet, I could be wrong). Also, Xbox Live you have to pay for their internet and look at them, the best online experience on a game system ever because people pay for it to make it like that. Also, most game's online you pay for has DLC, and that's good. =D ☆

 

[HylianBoy]

Heck yeah. To play flawlessly like I do offline.

 

[Mr. Rogu]

it depends what nintendo does with the wifi. if they make it like xbox live, then definately. but only to fix lag, probably not.

 

[kenhead]

I would pay $10 total. Not for a month or a year, but total. I'm a cheep person, but I do wish the online play worked.

 

[Joe-kun]

I wouldn't pay at all - We shouldn't HAVE to pay when we were promised it would run decently enough. MK Wii runs fine, so should Brawl.

 

[Immortal_One]

Only for random online matches. If I wanna play against my friends, I'd want it to be free.
The way I see it, if you pay a little a month, it keeps idiots away from Wifi. Also, I'd want to be able to speak through headsets when I play.

 

[Lord Viper]

I wouldn't pay at all - We shouldn't HAVE to pay when we were promised it would run decently enough. MK Wii runs fine, so should Brawl.

☆ True, Mario Kart Wii have lagless online play, but it's still flawed. You can't control the speed, you can't change your characters or carts after your race unless you quit all the way, and you can't control Battle Mode to have Balloon Battle or Coin Battle. Over all, I'll say even Brawl has a better online capability than Mario Kart Wii, only thing that Kart Wii has over Brawl is nearly lagless online play and can play random missions. Seeing how some Wii game's you can pay to have Downloadable Content, it shouldn't hurt to add more titles with DLC. But I'll agree that paying too much for little things to be added isn't worth paying. ☆

 

[BIGM1994]

I would definetly put money into it,think about it just give wifi like 10$ to help it get better but if it does ill get some great practice online that will win tournaments offline,think about it,10 could turn to much more

 

[Cherry64]

Or you could not have to travel to offline tournaments if the wi-fi was nearly lag-less. That means no button delay, no lag spikes...basically it
If that happened then it'd be awesome for us who can't readily travel to tournaments. I just wish they had ranking boards without laggy wi-fi.

 

[incoming fist]

Ye, I would DEFINITLEY pay to make wi-fi lag-less, so then I will stop getting 3 stocked >.<

 

[beanieislame]

i hate the lag a lot!... i thought it was gonna be better ..

 

[Wiscus]

Oh I would so definitely pay even though I have no source of income
I depend on wi-fi for human opponents, how I wish to play lag-free.

 

[Weegee_Project]

idk,maybe.......it all depends if nintendo can actually do it

 

[Cherry64]

Lol, Hence me saying would you pay for better Wi-Fi? it's a theory question. In theory would you pay for better wi-Fi?

 

[HizoSturm]

depends on how much.

 

[Steel]

Probably not, no reason I should have to pay for something that a company like Sony gives for free (that is it's much better service than Nintendo).

 

[Lovely]

Probably not, no reason I should have to pay for something that a company like Sony gives for free (that is it's much better service than Nintendo).

Some people are calling PSN crappy because it's not as good as XBL, it could be because those people are too use to XBL and all.

 

[FTWin]

I personally wouldn't, cause I've got a great local crew to smash with, but if my brawling was centered around online, yeah.
just because everytime i ve played online the game has been like "smash the analog left....2...3... character dashes" lol

 

[Exce L]

I actually don't complain at all about the connection.
I would pay for more features.. yes.. but no to connection .. everyone that I play that is good / I want to play has a great connection and there is barely ever any lag.

 

[Steel]

Some people are calling PSN crappy because it's not as good as XBL, it could be because those people are too use to XBL and all.

Really? I wouldn't know, I've xbox live. But from what I could tell it's definitely better than Nintendo's servers.

 

[Marsu]

I would as well!

 

[PassWurD]

Nah, I still like the aspect of going to people's house to play for fun etc...

I'm too old school. ;(

 

[Tristan_win]

I would be willing to pay 100$ for nearly perfect connection if it was guaranteed.

 

[TimeWarpedBrawler]

I would pay for certain features like to have names of wifi and special brawl with friends. And longer taunt space like 30 to 40 characters.

 

[Cherry64]

Really? I wouldn't know, I've xbox live. But from what I could tell it's definitely better than Nintendo's servers.

10 agree's
Lurve how people abuse this thread for post count. Makes my day
Good replies though.

Tell me however, What do you actually think Nintendo would give you if you payed 50 Dollars to them for better Wi-Fi?

If this Q fails I'll create another thread and link this in it.

 

[CRUSH_]

I'd pay for it, at least as much as xbox live if I could play wi-fi without throwing off my game for tournaments. I've only been to one so far and some of my friends can't stand this game (yeah I know, wtf ><) so my only competitive level practice is against THEIR mains and that's like, less than ten characters.

Names would be a necessity but people posing as big-name players would be an issue.

 

[Cherry64]

I'd pay for it, at least as much as xbox live if I could play wi-fi without throwing off my game for tournaments. I've only been to one so far and some of my friends can't stand this game (yeah I know, wtf ><) so my only competitive level practice is against THEIR mains and that's like, less than ten characters.

Names would be a necessity but people posing as big-name players would be an issue.

Names how? like in Basic brawls?

 

[Noobicidal]

I wouldn't pay for better wifi. I'd petition for better wifi.

 

[*JuriHan*]

I was thinking about it with my friend while playing halo3 online. If Nintendo had us make a 1-time payment to make Wi-Fi better, Would you?

I'm going to say if it was like 40-50 bucks for a relatively lagless and a total input lagless wifi, I would do it yes.

hells yes I would

 

[Nysyarc]

I wouldn't pay just to fix the lag, they would have to improve the friend system and make the With Anyone mode more like the current With Friends mode (more options and ability to join/create rooms). Also, like sMexy-Blu said, voice chat online would be a very welcome addition. I think they should have downloadable game add-ons and expansions as well, like more characters/stages for Brawl.

If they fixed all of that I would gladly pay well over fifty bucks.

 

[Kefrius]

Ill definetly pay $50 bucks ayear for a lagless SSBB match, miss them so much...

 

[c3gill]

honestly, NO. basic brawl is worthles. As for 1on1 matches, unless your internet is **** or your battling someone in another country, you shouldnt be lagging that much.

If they were making drastic changes, like previously mentioned, I would consider it. otherwise, the system is fine as is for friend battles.

 

[Heartz♥]

We can't have it all. Brawl could have been released with no wifi at all. The game was delayed too much. It had to be let out.

 

[dancingfrogman]

While it would be nice to have it more lagless, I would only par for it with other extras. Such as one on one mode, a chance to do stock and coin mode (with some resrictions of course), character balancement, new characters/stages, a stage builder like the stage studio with rotation and mirroring etc. If I would pay to patch up Brawl altogether, I would, to pay just to cut online lag, most likely not.

 

[Cherry64]

We can't have it all. Brawl could have been released with no wifi at all. The game was delayed too much. It had to be let out.

Haha, finally someone who knows why brawl wasn't what we all wanted. It had to be let out, it was already way late.

 

[tmntrules2003]

i mean if it was worth it and there were more features to it i dont see why i wouldnt pay something for it.

 

[iLight]

i would pay for this

 

[Prawn]

There would be no way they would do a one-time payment. It would probably be along the lines of XBOX live, a monthly payment and such. That being said, I would pay it, as long as a better friends system, voice chat for all games, and way better DLC in addition to lag-free internet play is put in place.

I would be willing to pay like, 10-15 bucks a month for that. If it worked that is.

 

[Lord Viper]

☆ Speaking of paying for better Wifi, Wifi troubles are happening again if you want to play with friends. How many of you have or had this same problem today? ☆