Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But at least it isn't Red Steel. (It wasn't all bad though, the shooting segments were fun as hell.)
The other side of the coin is also cynical and buying consoles only to resell them.
I don't understand what cynicism has to do with reselling consoles.
The number one cause of people becoming zombies is when they think it's a bright idea to go and attack/defend themselves. You do spend a lot of time sneaking up on zombies, but I'd rather just have the big option of moving past them. There's something called "stealth" lol. Zombies are not the brightest bunch.
Not "kinda". It is.
No disagreement there.
I don't know about anyone else, but I listen to others, cause I don't want to jump the gun, spend 60 dollars, and be felt like I wasted my money. All in all, if someone tells me "It's a rent" or "wait till the price drops", it gives me an idea of what people think of the game. I'm not going to support a game/company, because they made an average to below average product.
I do acknowledge the other side. However, when your metacritic score is 70 (in a world of generous game reviewers these days), it leaves me to think it's not worth dropping 60 dollars on a game like that.
Why is that? (I'm not disagreeing or agreeing, I'm just curious).
I agree with that, there could be a little of variety but it doesn't break the atmosphere of the game in any way IMO. The more weapons they add, the less you feel like this is a zombie apocalyse where weapons are scarce and rare. There needs to be an equilibrium of both scarcity and variety: Too much variety of guns feels like too much of a shooter or Resident Evil 4 and onward; Not much of it won't feel like a video game which its purpose is to give fun and satisfaction.
This is the part I agree the most, there could have a lot of things that can be found in a kitchen or a basement that could be used as a melee weapon. Just the cricket bat is bad. I bet the developers thought the survivors will only want to stick to those since they are rock-solid and have a long range, I have no idea why they chose to have this as their only melee weapon. >.<
In my opinion, there shouldn't be any puzzles to begin with. Finding numbers to unlock doors or safes are ok (just wish they didn't overuse the scan). You won't be solving any puzzle in a apocalypse, which brings us again to the fact that this is a video game so developers are used to make puzzles for everything today. I'm glad it tries to be its own thing, the game should be about survival and management of resources.
I disagree on this part. From what I have seen so far, you can in fact avoid a lot of combat. Specially bigger rooms or open areas, that's when you can go for the run.
I know right. They could have polished the MP function a lot and added on-line. Lame Ubisoft.
I do. I just don't think most reviewers are giving this game a fair score. I did notice that when reading through the walls-of-text in their reviews, it was easy to tell that the person who is reviewing the game doesn't like the genre at all. Most of the time there would be a negative remark of an aspect of the game, I would just shrug and think to myself that it would be an awesome game mechanic.
Or, you could just remember that 5GB update is gonna take awhile anyways, so you could wait.
Depends on your internet. For me I just waited an hour on wireless that's kinda weak. If I had hardwired it in things woulda gone quicker.Or, you could just remember that 5GB update is gonna take awhile anyways, so you could wait.
You can run the update in the background and it's around 2 GB.Or, you could just remember that 5GB update is gonna take awhile anyways, so you could wait.
People use game fly or red box? Don't game demos exist for a reason? And it is free too.
Yeah, but it gives you some sort of feel for the game. Like, how it plays, etc. Or, that is supposed to be the point of demos.
I think if you're willing to spend up to 65 dollars on a game, 1 dollar shouldn't really be a problem. This is just textbook conspicuous consumption.People use game fly or red box? Don't game demos exist for a reason? And it is free too.
Reviews are free. Who cares on spending a dollar on a game when there are plenty of research tools out there to determine whether or not a game is worth your time.
I still have yet to regret a purchase.
For most people, the Deluxe Set offers more value than the Basic Set. Buying the Deluxe Set without buying a game saves you $10 more than the Basic with a $60 game since every extra stuff including Nintendo Land is solely $50. If you weren't buying a launch game with the Basic, though, then that saves you more money, but I doubt people would want to buy a system at launch without buying a game yet, unless they're waiting for more big games. Buying games for more than $50 ($50 = 500 Points = $5) digitally would save you some money, too, due to the Deluxe Digital Promotion for the Deluxe Set.
It has to be exclusive for the Wii U so you're going to have to format it. Unless you meant the Wii U, the Wii can't use hard drives, only SD cards.
