Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
expain how they are the ONLY 2 good secondaries? that makes no sense lolSnake or Olimar are the only real good options for Wario as a secondary. I recommend Snake since he can contend with Snake. I'd use Olimar if you want to completely change up the playstyle on your opponent and throw off their game. You can use Olimar to pray on those who are bad at approaching. Still, Snake does this better so you'll probably want to use him in all situations instead.
I don't think he'll be able to explain it. Your list was good though. However, in the end it depends on the player and what their comfortable with. I mean I use Zelda as a back up.expain how they are the ONLY 2 good secondaries? that makes no sense lol
especially since olimar doesnt cover nearly as many matchups as ICs or falco.
and snake is still not good vs D3.
So, I watched the end.
LOL maybe back in 2008?What about Kirby for secondary? Covers D3, Falco, and MK a little
This. Wario's worst matchup is like 4:6 and it's MK so GL finding a character that does better than that. I know there are characters that do better but you'd really be better off just getting really good with one character, rather than trying to juggle secondaries for every match up.wario doesnt really need a secondary.
If you spend 1/2 the time focusing with wario on the 3 hated matchups rather than learning the new character enough to beat those characters you would profit.
Why would anyone want to put the time and work and effort in to the game? I mean it's supposed to just come easy.... /sarcasmwario doesnt really need a secondary.
If you spend 1/2 the time focusing with wario on the 3 hated matchups rather than learning the new character enough to beat those characters you would profit.
I.. didnt know you back thenSo, I watched the end.
Apparently I don't play Yoshi. I'm hurt.![]()
Because a small disadvantage is not reason enough to switch characters for what is probably going to be at best even. Whenever the match-up isn't 35-65 or worse, you shouldn't switch characters because chances are that you know that match-up better as your main anyway. The match-ups that you're going to want to really consider switching on are Meta Knight, Dedede on certain stages, Falco on certain stages, and that should be it. Other than that, you should be able to manage with whatever the match-up is. Olimar does decent against Meta Knight and crushes Dedede on the stages that they would usually defeat Wario. Meta Knight versus Snake is pretty much 55-45 in your disadvantage and the stages that Meta Knight will take Wario too are stages that Snake should be able to work best with. Dedede Snake also has a hard time on but again, the stages that Dedede will pick should give Snake enough of an edge to keep you going. I only named those two because counterpicks, in my opinion, are moreso to counter the player than the match-up.expain how they are the ONLY 2 good secondaries? that makes no sense lol
especially since olimar doesnt cover nearly as many matchups as ICs or falco.
and snake is still not good vs D3.
EXCUSES!I.. didnt know you back then
![]()
im soooooreee delta-cod.
not really.Yeah I mean sure if the MK just rushes wario he loses but once he gets in his "zone" its close to being GG
Uhhh first of all, where do you think MK will be taking wario? lolBecause a small disadvantage is not reason enough to switch characters for what is probably going to be at best even. Whenever the match-up isn't 35-65 or worse, you shouldn't switch characters because chances are that you know that match-up better as your main anyway. The match-ups that you're going to want to really consider switching on are Meta Knight, Dedede on certain stages, Falco on certain stages, and that should be it. Other than that, you should be able to manage with whatever the match-up is. Olimar does decent against Meta Knight and crushes Dedede on the stages that they would usually defeat Wario. Meta Knight versus Snake is pretty much 55-45 in your disadvantage and the stages that Meta Knight will take Wario too are stages that Snake should be able to work best with. Dedede Snake also has a hard time on but again, the stages that Dedede will pick should give Snake enough of an edge to keep you going. I only named those two because counterpicks, in my opinion, are moreso to counter the player than the match-up.
notrly...Tbh if olimar had grab armor he would be nearly unstoppable![]()
Logic would prob **** praxis in that mu tbh. He's beaten every other peach with olimarEDIT: also if you second olimar, have fun fighting peach (namely praxis) LMAO
Wario does NOT do fine against Meta Knight or all CPs and all neutrals. Check out the matches of our better Wario's playing against Meta Knight, particularly Dojo vs DMG. DMG has great spacing, he knows how to poke, and he knows when to get away from Meta Knight and the match-up went very poorly from him. So no, again, Wario DOES NOT DO OKAY against Meta Knight.Uhhh first of all, where do you think MK will be taking wario? lol
Wario does fine vs MK on all neutrals and CPs
second, olimar is no better vs MK than wario is. Brood beats M2K one time and al of the sudden people are like "OMFG, pikmen 2 gud"
if you ban FD vs D3 then you should be alright, but if you still cant handle the matchup then there are more characters than just olimar that **** D3
ICs, Pika, falco, MK? the first two also **** falco as well, while olimar doesnt do too well vs falco.
so saying that oli and snake are warios only good secondaries is a ******** thing to say.
oh i forgot about snake, snake doesnt have an advantage vs MK on ANY stage
i hate the wario boards....
EDIT: also if you second olimar, have fun fighting peach (namely praxis) LMAO
Logic...is painful...Logic would prob **** praxis in that mu tbh. He's beaten every other peach with olimar
do you guys just not know?forbidden!
Yes, Brood vs M2K proves this because that's the first time Olimar has been played at such a high level. Brood lost to DEHF because DEHF was a better overall player, not because Olimar cannot handle the match-up. I don't know who you talked to but it was either ages ago, you talked to the wrong people, or you're bull****ting for the sake of trying to make a point. Olimar vs Falco is 50-50 or 55-45 depending on the stage. Olimar is at advantage.Excellence you're funny olimar can handle mk brood vs m2k proves this.
Olimar can handle falco.......wouldn't brood vs dehf disprove that? I've talked to a couple of olimars and asked them about it when I wanted to learn him for the nj my and the said the exact opposite of what you're saying.
I don't see any point in lying or bull ****ting I'm not gaining anything and it was a couple a months ago when I was asking about the MK MU with oli. So you're saying DEHF >Brood. M2k loses to brood so oli can handle the match but when brood loses it's because DEHF is the better player and not because of the character ah I see.Yes, Brood vs M2K proves this because that's the first time Olimar has been played at such a high level. Brood lost to DEHF because DEHF was a better overall player, not because Olimar cannot handle the match-up. I don't know who you talked to but it was either ages ago, you talked to the wrong people, or you're bull****ting for the sake of trying to make a point. Olimar vs Falco is 50-50 or 55-45 depending on the stage. Olimar is at advantage.
M2K lost because Brood is on his skill level and Olimar does okay against Meta Knight. Falco vs Olimar is pretty even and on the stage they picked (Battlefield) they were even. That means Brood lost because DEHF was better. Cancel out your variables and I guess you would see.I don't see any point in lying or bull ****ting I'm not gaining anything and it was a couple a months ago when I was asking about the MK MU with oli. So you're saying DEHF >Brood. M2k loses to brood so oli can handle the match but when brood loses it's because DEHF is the better player and not because of the character ah I see.
35-65 if played right is not managable. Take into account that MK does well on every stage and can take Wario somewhere that he isn't great on and you've got hell. Personally, I don't believe there are any real good Warios besides Fiction and the Meta Knight players are not only overall better but they have a better character which may contribute to this match-up seeming a lot more hopeless than it really is.Excellence, TBTC is right.
Wario DOES do okay vs MK, it's perfectly manageable
So you think brood is on m2k levels? i understand you wanting to give the japanese players their respect I feel the same way however, M2k is the best player in the world. One tournament does not change that fact. The only other person you can say is on m2k's level is ally and maybe ADHD . However, m2k has been a machine place no worse than top 3 in every tourney I've seen and being able to win almost every single doubles tourney.M2K lost because Brood is on his skill level and Olimar does okay against Meta Knight. Falco vs Olimar is pretty even and on the stage they picked (Battlefield) they were even. That means Brood lost because DEHF was better. Cancel out your variables and I guess you would see.
35-65 if played right is not managable. Take into account that MK does well on every stage and can take Wario somewhere that he isn't great on and you've got hell. Personally, I don't believe there are any real good Warios besides Fiction and the Meta Knight players are not only overall better but they have a better character which may contribute to this match-up seeming a lot more hopeless than it really is.