I see why Atomsk doesn't post in this debate now.
If he has something valid to add He might as well.
When randomplayer24329 and foxfalcomasta666 say "my opinion is as valid as yours" to someone like Mew2King, myself, or Atomsk, it's extremely insulting and stupid when we have significantly more real high-level tournament experience.
When you are saying soemthing like.
Snake vs Mk is Snake's advantage. I know cause im high level. Then guess what? You are on the same level as a casual noob because they make the same argument.
Snake vs Mk is Snake's advantage cause he has grenades.
How does that validate your argument?
If your argument is bad, no amount of experience will help your bad argument.
How hard is that to understand?
Continually, consistently, and repeatedly, Snake vs MK is proven to be Snake's advantage over and over and over and over and over in real, high-level tournament sets and money matches in the region with the best players. The vast majority of our top players and experienced players agree that Snake wins and that MK should not be banned. I don't think any more evidence should be needed.
inui I must be speaking chinese cause evidently, you aren't registering what I am saying.
Marth dominated in melee.
Fox on the other hand is the best character and his tournament rankings were below falco (who is second).
By your logic if we went purely on the inductive reasoning Fox should be below Marth and Falco.
Fox would be high tier.
Its great that o players agree with you but it says nothing about the actual argument for why they believe so.