kin3tic-c4jun-3
Smash Ace
So back to the OP...
IMO I think there should be a ban if there is absolutely no professional that can beat him. I also think there should be more time put into this consideration. In Melee all the tourney winners were pretty much either Fox or Shiek (others too I know, but as a majority), so having a 'best character' should be nothing new.... However, if it's ONLY MK winning ALL the time, there could be a problem.
Honestly, as long as there is at least ONE counter character, there should not be a ban.
Having said that, I don't know MK intamately enough to say that opinion is completely valid^. I haven't seen him too much in a professional sense so I actually don't really know.
But I've got a question..... What are the actual requirements for a ban? If anyone could clarify this we'd make a little more progress in the discussion (mbe I missed it already, but.... 6039 posts on 403 pages... lol)
IMO I think there should be a ban if there is absolutely no professional that can beat him. I also think there should be more time put into this consideration. In Melee all the tourney winners were pretty much either Fox or Shiek (others too I know, but as a majority), so having a 'best character' should be nothing new.... However, if it's ONLY MK winning ALL the time, there could be a problem.
Honestly, as long as there is at least ONE counter character, there should not be a ban.
Having said that, I don't know MK intamately enough to say that opinion is completely valid^. I haven't seen him too much in a professional sense so I actually don't really know.
But I've got a question..... What are the actual requirements for a ban? If anyone could clarify this we'd make a little more progress in the discussion (mbe I missed it already, but.... 6039 posts on 403 pages... lol)