DJRome
Smash Hero
josh lets me play sheik against him. and we have "fun" lol
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I stayed home from school today, so I can talk about them whenever. If I'm not online when you want to, just text me.I'll get in touch with Mike sometime after he's out of school and see when is good for him. I think he told me once that he's most comfortable with anything 9/10PM and later, but we'll see if that's still the case.
put in a good word for me, and my ****ty playing.We should update, asap.
... there was an option 2?Sexy avatar you got thar, Dark Hart.
Was "Option 2" too much?
Heck yeah lol.9. Omniostrich
Crystalnite beat Karn in a set at the first Bi-weekly.dude my list was hella close....
how did you differentiate between crystalnite and jim...they had the exact same placing...
and i put karn over foxy...karn beat him the first bi weekly, foxy beat him the second, but karn placed well at billfest while foxy wasnt there...
my other than that our lists were identical
i didnt know all 3 duke tournaments were being counted...Crystalnite beat Karn in a set at the first Bi-weekly.
What are you talking about bro? He's still there.i can't make that honorable mention joke at stingers anymore
I don't actually. I love fighting spacies even though it's next to impossible for Falcon. Tech chasing is too fun whenever you happen to land from whatever combo you're stuck in because you got shined once.Crystalnite beat Karn in a set at the first Bi-weekly.
Foxy took 2 sets off of Karn. 2-1 is the record in Foxy's record. You can't count a tournament that Foxy wasn't at.
<3 Josh
Do you hate Falco?
I love Austin but I agree with this.Hmmm, I still don't think there is enough tourney evidence to put Foxy above me. He lost to DJRome, which is worse than losing to Crystalnite, technically. Also, I actually have records vs everyone else, like beating Peter. I mean, I don't think I can beat foxy currently, but I don't think there is any data that can support him being above me. . . The fact is, he doesn't have enough tourney placings to use as data, and we traditionally don't give people the benefit of the doubt when they don't have placings.
So....Hmmm, I still don't think there is enough tourney evidence to put Foxy above me. He lost to DJRome, which is worse than losing to Crystalnite, technically. Also, I actually have records vs everyone else, like beating Peter. I mean, I don't think I can beat foxy currently, but I don't think there is any data that can support him being above me. . . The fact is, he doesn't have enough tourney placings to use as data, and we traditionally don't give people the benefit of the doubt when they don't have placings.
Foxy beat Karn in two sets. 2-1.i agree w/fix on this the whole reason to look at sets is to assess play on different day in addition to the "head to head" that is deemed less important than placings.
i'm going to give my little spiel about this and then i'll try to work on a number based system that may or may not be useful in the future.
First of all, i don't agree with the discarding of previous prs, they should matter, if only slightly.
second, i feel that the more recent tournaments are what are most important, and i don't know if this is done already, but the more recent ones should count more
third, there should be ties like there are in brawl prs
fourth, for people who are in the prs, attendance should matter. in fact, foxy only attended 2 small tourneys. there is no way to tell if he would be knocked out my randos in a larger setting. if this is ignored, we are in fact penalizing the people that take a chance by attending more tournaments in case they are unexpectedly beaten. this is the case with karn and the first biweekly. he attended and was beaten by 2 ppl he did not expect. perhaps foxy would do even worse if he attended, but you never know because he didn't attend. and the only fair way to account for this is the penalize those who do not attend.
fifth, again, there is a large emphasis on the head to head matchup even if you discredited this before, kevin.
the data so far says:
karn beat foxy
foxy beat karn
(even)
karn placed fourth at bills
karn is 1-1 vs crystalnite
karn is 3-0 vs dj
karn has done better than foxy in teams (okay so slightly relevant)
foxy did not attend bills
foxy is 1-1 vs dj
I'm not sure how this results in foxy>karn
Lol I should really stop going for ridiculous wizard's foot spikes in friendlies I guessI played Ace and didn't say a word about Ganon while we played. I won just a little bit more of the matches, mostly going even, except for the match where I 4 stocked him.
come on, you say that placement is more important than sets, right? head to head sets should be used LAST after considering set counts with other people, which you state is more important. given these criteria,Foxy beat Karn in two sets. 2-1.
Maybe I should bold that. Thinking about it.
1. matters when disputing close data
2. No. We update frequently enough for this not to matter.
3. that tie was stupid.
4. ...........DJ come on now
5. Lol 2-1