Skrah
Smash Ace
Haa nice. For some reason that made me laugh hard lol.Transformers - Fairies in disguise
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Haa nice. For some reason that made me laugh hard lol.Transformers - Fairies in disguise
Since the symbol isn't the original one intended for the Guerudo, I am not completely sure we can draw a whole lot from it's meaning. At least not from Games prior to the symbol's introduction in the Gamecube updated version of Legend of Zelda.So too did Veran and Onox bear the Gerudo Symbol on their clothing/armor. Let's take a look at this symbol:
![]()
Let's examine what this symbol may actually mean. Look at the middle section. It appears to be two horizontal people merging into one another, perhaps signifying an infinite connection. Seeing as how Ganon, and his minions, Veran, Onox, and Zant all bear this symbol, and all have had a spiritual connection with the Dark Lord, perhaps all who bear the Gerudo symbol - due to its potential symbolic meaning - are actually tied directly with him, and perhaps, are entities created from and represent him.
Look at this history behind those three characters. Veran, Onox, and Zant were all sent to different worlds, Labrynna, Holodrum, and Hyrule respectively, to conquer it, but as part of the ultimate plan behind it all, were sacrificed in one way or another so that Ganon could rise again from death/imprisonment to thwart Link and rule the land.
Symbols aren't created for aesthetics; symbols represent ideas. It's a matter of deciphering them that will lead to great discoveries.
Angry reactions to a new Zelda game are common.I really can't believe lol. Where are Spire and Scott and all of the other Zelda Thread regulars?
So what do you think of people being angry at there being a train?
That was the best post I've seen in a long time. Thank you Cap'n.Angry reactions to a new Zelda game are common.
Although I do think the Zelda themes are made by 5-year olds during a sugar rush.
"Let have Link Time travel Like the Back to the Future guy!"
"The Mask was an awesome movie! Let's make it a game!"
"Talking hats!"
"Muppet Treasure Island!"
"Cloning!"
"Werewolves are awesome!"
"Trains! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Which is why I love Zelda so much.
It'd be too much of a gimmick, but nevertheless, I kind of like the idea.What bothers me is that people won't give it a second chance just because of the train. It happened to me. I hated WW's graphics, and didn't want to play it. A year after its release I finally played it and wow was I wrong.
EDIT: Spire we should do a "I ate an animal's turd and survived" group lol.
No, the 'survived' is cool, but you realize that we would be part of a group of people who share stories about when they [accidentally] ate fecal matter. Plus, it would grow really old really fast.Cross out the survived part lol. I dunno it's just a suggestion.
Just wait until it actually comes out. People will play it.What bothers me is that people won't give it a second chance just because of the train. It happened to me. I hated WW's graphics, and didn't want to play it. A year after its release I finally played it and wow was I wrong.
EDIT: Spire we should do a "I ate an animal's turd and survived" group lol.
I bet you anything the Master Document says, "the games can go anywhere we want in the timeline." However, I would really like to know how our timeline compares with their [potential] timeline. It would be awesome if even half of it was accurate.Unless you get a high-ranking job an Nintendo any time soon, I doubt you'll be seeing the offical timeline document for a long, long time. I think they're still not done, myself. I think Miyamoto and Aonuma are having just as much trouble as the internet to figure out the timeline.
SORRY I CAN'T READ YOU OVER THE SOUND OFMY AWESOME TRAIN.The zelda timeline is a puzzle itself only professor layton can solve it.
Ochobobo that zelda wii is so awsome looking. I'd put it up on display infact if i had it. There was another one latley that was all gold and had the Twilight Princess triforce symbol on the sides but it wasn't done with 100% effort since they still left the white on the bottom of the wii and they did the wii remote and left some white so it didn't look to good.
I still can't wait for spirit tracks i'm guessing they will release a copy with a limited edition dsi so i'm waiting for that aswell.
They are probably going to start making games that simply link games together.I bet you anything the Master Document says, "the games can go anywhere we want in the timeline." However, I would really like to know how our timeline compares with their [potential] timeline. It would be awesome if even half of it was accurate.
Do you think they decide the timeline by finding the most popular theories on the internet?They should make a game that goes over the history of a bunch of the previous games in the 2 timelines, and then close up the timelines in a way that brings both to the exact same point in time. Pretty sure it was Spire that thought of this idea first. If they actually do this, it would be a great way to go over what the real timeline actually is within a Zelda game.
If that's true, then he officially screwed up a solid timeline. Now Twilight Princess has a strong chance of being the only game besides Majora's Mask in the child timeline. That's just stupid.Halfway through Ochobo's timeline video, Myamoto was quoted saying ALTTP happened after the original two NES Zelda games.
It has been stated that they have a specific timeline, and before a game is released they are certain where the new game goes in the timeline.Do you think they decide the timeline by finding the most popular theories on the internet?
It seems like Nintendo can just change its mind about when a Zelda game takes place with every installment.
So, does that mean they aren't certain during the development of the game and don't let the timeline get in the way of their creativity...It has been stated that they have a specific timeline, and before a game is released they are certain where the new game goes in the timeline.
AVGN says it's true, and that it was recorded in a Nintendo Power interview. Apparently, the timeline for the first five games is OoT, then LoZ, then LoZ's sequel, and ATTP last. Not even Myamoto was sure how GBA Zelda fit in, though. The second, split timeline came afterwards, I'm guessing.If that's true, then he officially screwed up a solid timeline. Now Twilight Princess has a strong chance of being the only game besides Majora's Mask in the child timeline. That's just stupid.
How old is that interview? Because I recall something sounding almost exactly like that from a NP issue around the time WW came out. Since then, they have officially changed the order of the games.AVGN says it's true, and that it was recorded in a Nintendo Power interview. Apparently, the timeline for the first five games is OoT, then LoZ, then LoZ's sequel, and ATTP last. Not even Myamoto was sure how GBA Zelda fit in, though. The second, split timeline came afterwards, I'm guessing.
Before OoT, during the creation of the world by the godesses, I want strife and conflict. In Termina.Beyond that, I'd like to hear all of your ideas for a new Zelda game. Take both game structure and the timeline into consideration when designing the overall scheme of it. You've heard my game (the post-apocalyptic Adult Link timeline Termina in the sky), so share your own. I believe that we may be able to discover even more connections in the series by creating new Legends of Zelda to bridge the official games together. Go for it!
We have no idea, as it is a question. It is suggested that it has dark powers, but we have no idea.Fierce Diety was said to be just as evil as Majora himself.
If the creators of the Legend of Zelda can change their mind on the order of their own games, I am skeptical of the entire timelining process.How old is that interview? Because I recall something sounding almost exactly like that from a NP issue around the time WW came out. Since then, they have officially changed the order of the games.
I appreciate that they focus on the actual game as an individual rather than trying to fit the game into the timeline, but they must realize that a growing number of people recognize the timeline and hence, dive deeper into its intricacies. If they could simply incorporate both focuses, then they could make incredible titles.
Beyond that, I'd like to hear all of your ideas for a new Zelda game. Take both game structure and the timeline into consideration when designing the overall scheme of it. You've heard my game (the post-apocalyptic Adult Link timeline Termina in the sky), so share your own. I believe that we may be able to discover even more connections in the series by creating new Legends of Zelda to bridge the official games together. Go for it!