Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
LOL is this because Q hates camping all the time or is this because you guys were all playing your non-camping characters?I kept track of about 2 hours of friendlies at a smashfest I was just at. The average number of edge grabs each game was probably about 7.
That's about the average I get.LOL is this because Q hates camping all the time or is this because you guys were all playing your non-camping characters?
I think you quoted the wrong post lol.That's about the average I get.
No, I didn't.I think you quoted the wrong post lol.
Technically this is what you should've quoted.No, I didn't.
I see ur point though, oh well.I kept track of about 2 hours of friendlies at a smashfest I was just at. The average number of edge grabs each game was probably about 7.
I did it in a 5 minute match (plus sudden death).Wow. Grabbing the ledge every 6.86 seconds is a perfectly reasonable situation? Just...no. I would venture to say that there has never been a 7 or 8 minute match where a player has legitimately grabbed the ledge 70 times.
Too true, long live planking.Would it be bad if the community lost interest in Brawl entirely? I think not...
trueWould it be bad if the community lost interest in Brawl entirely? I think not...
Your tourney plays Sudden Deaths? >.> That's different.I did it in a 5 minute match (plus sudden death).
Needless to say, both of us did it in Sudden Death, as neither wanted to cross the bomb path. Longest SD in that tournaments history. I finally went down after 4-6 minutes of bombs just because I had already placed the week before and did not need to place again this time.
But, while we're at it, we better add a rule against flying under the stage to stall. I mean, you can't fly back and forth under FD in a 5 minute tourney and get 70 ledge grabs.
HAHAHA this is sig worthy.So, if I have to legitimately grab the edge more than 70 times in order to recover, all my opponent has to do is accuse me of stalling and I forfeit? Sign me up!
You need to play some Brawl+ with me some time. It's close to Melee,but has no wavedash and an auto L-Cancel. I think you'd really enjoy it.Omg I had that very same idea not long ago.http://www.smashboards.com/images/smilies/smile.gif If more noobs start outplacing the pros, then everyone will stop playing eventually.
Bring it over to Yoster's next time and we will. I'd rather play you in Melee though.You need to play some Brawl+ with me some time. It's close to Melee,but has no wavedash and an auto L-Cancel. I think you'd really enjoy it.
You're right, becuase it's already clear which game is.This thread is about discussing a rule for brawl, not which game is better.
Honor does not exist in video games sadly... when you say that its like saying.Life could be so much easier if people in competitive smash knew what honor was and didn't hug the ledge like it was their girlfriend. Otherwise we wouldn't even need a discussion like this.
That's... kinda important.According to Michael Hey (NorCal's best IC's, and has experience in Japan's scene), the rule only applies if the time is ran out.
so after i force 70 ledgegrabs, i can plank and win as long as i don't reach 70 ledgegrabsAccording to Michael Hey (NorCal's best IC's, and has experience in Japan's scene), the rule only applies if the time is ran out.
what?so after i force 70 ledgegrabs, i can plank and win as long as i don't reach 70 ledgegrabs
indirect rules are bad
What's your point here?Who says you have to plank the entire match? You can plank for one of your opponent's stocks to easily get around the 70 ledge grab limit, utterly **** them, and then fight them normally with a very comfortable one stock lead. Comebacks are not that common in Brawl.
i think he's arguing that the timer shouldn't NEED to run out for the rule to matter because if they get to like 70 grabs and win even with a second left, they winWhat's your point here?
but if they're "edgecamping", the only reason they won with a second left is either because the opponent chose to engage them (which is stupid) or because they chose to eventually get off the edge, in which case there's no reason their win wouldn't be legitimate because they gained no advantage from edgecampingi think he's arguing that the timer shouldn't NEED to run out for the rule to matter because if they get to like 70 grabs and win even with a second left, they win
are you arguing that endgame ledge camping is the only ledgecamping that is "bad"but if they're "edgecamping", the only reason they won with a second left is either because the opponent chose to engage them (which is stupid) or because they chose to eventually get off the edge, in which case there's no reason their win wouldn't be legitimate because they gained no advantage from edgecamping
No, for probably the 9th time, I personally don't believe ANY ledgecamping is "bad"are you arguing that endgame ledge camping is the only ledgecamping that is "bad"
this is a bit hard to decipher, but i'll take a crack at iti meant do you think TOs, the people who may wish to initiate this rule, only have a problem with planking endgame, because if that's the only thing they want to stop 70, is high enough to not hinder ledgecampers
Probably. That match would be funny to see too, just for the novelty factor.I didn't see this in the first post, and I don't feel like going through 24 pages, but what happens if both players go over 70? Does it nullify the rule?