@Adumb
So he can't breathe fire, then.
Yes
as for the backdraft protector:
has anyone seen inside his mouth when he breathes fire?
we have no proof that he doesnt have on either >_>
as we mentioned earlier, a creature evolved to spit fire would have stuff like this...
also: could his metal arm bands block a sword?
A false palette is quite obvious and would be seen every time he opens his mouth.
....so he can only burst small (flashes only) flames because of his lack of protection.
Just like we were treating it already....
No.
He can't breath fire, period.
Ever.
He has nothing prevent backdraft, any flame produced will kill him.
Because the flame will creep backwards through the highly combustible material.
I have a question. Why is Bowser allowed his fire, while Ganon's not allowed his magic?
He's not.
Fire breathing is possible, but he lacks a false palette so he can't do it.
I'm quite sure that there's some scientific reasoning behind magic as there is behind dragons.
And, Bowser is a dragon how? Too me he looks somewhat like a giant alligator with spikes, which doesn't at all resemble dragons.
Not at all. To both. There's explanation for SOME EFFECTS ACHIEVABLE BY MAGIC, but magic as a meta-system is not scientific.
He is also not a dragon, but there is a scientific explanation for how entities can breath fire.
Dragons breathing fire has a scientific reasoning behind it. Other reptiles breathing fire does not. Also, is religious reasoning allowed here? If so, then Ganon is a immortal. I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed. It's alot like scientific reasoning, it provides you the proof of existence.
I want to see what Joe says about this.
The reason why fire-breathing is allowed is because it is possible for bacteria to produce gas as a by-product of digestion, the particular one they are producing is hydrogen. It could be stored in gas-sacs, and then released, with some sort of spark, it would burn.
Pretty much any type of animal could do it if evolved properly (heck, humans can breath fire, they just need fuel and a source).
And no, no religious reasoning.
lowut?
What does Zelda do?
Tone was only brought up for Zelda as she had a bow and Adumb had to find a way for that to conventionally work for her.
Same deal with Peach, only she's actually done sports that require some physical ability. Tone can easily be applied to her as well.
What does Zelda do? Nothing. The whole Sheik thing is due to "magical" alteration. Taking this into RL changed up the "magical" alteration, which included physical buffs, to cosmetic changes. Zelda, herself, wouldn't have tone by RL standards since she'd technically not be able to turn into Sheik.
It's far more plausible for Peach to have tone since she is actually shown doing some form of physical activity.
Peach can easily have tone. No one bothered with it since it was assumed she had no weapons and wasn't worth wasting the time with.
Zelda had a bow which gave her a better chance of winning so she was given tone to justify usage of it even though she wouldn't actually have any due to not doing anything at her castle.
The sports games aren't canonical, and they're the only place where she shows physical activity.
Also, Ganondorf could revert to a baby again I guess, don't know how effective that would be, but I guess he could.