An alternate skin looking like a default skin is
NOTHING compared to one playable character looking like another.
Why do you think the
costume for
or the
costume for
got removed?
It does when the basic argument about why Ninten can't be included is, because barring a redesign, if a default Ness and a default Ninten appeared on the stage at the same time the players would get confused, and because of that Ninten can't be in the game (again, unless he is redesigned, which I personally have no problem with). It's just a flimsy argument when the same thing can happen with Falcon, and it's arguably even worse because it's a pallet swap (at least a different character would have minor differences and a different portrait for instance).
The fact that Falcon's issue is about one character having two incredibly similar pallets vs. 2 separate characters having similar looking default pallets is irrelevant.
Yes Sakurai did remove those 2 pallets, but only because the characters they were based on were now in the game (in one case is the echo of the original character, i.e. Samus/Dark Samus). Because Ninten isn't based on Ness (it's the other way around) there would be no reason to change any of Ness' pallets unless Sakurai truly wanted to.
This would have been a better example:
god these alts are so awful. Why the **** is SEGA so stingy about this.
Actually yes that's a much better example, or Pac-Man (EDIT: got partly
'd on that lol). Thanks!
I just get annoyed when people come up with arbitrary "rules" on things when there are clear examples of things being otherwise. What's worse is when those misconceptions spread and become like gospel.