I think theoretically the best way to determine seeding in the future would be to do round robin pools and then have those determine seeding. Obviously this isn't fool-proof, since people could just sandbag during pools, just barely make bracket and then end up having an easier bracket. I honestly don't like the idea of fabricating brackets in order to make matches that people want to see. I mean sports don't try to manipulate brackets in order to do the matches that people want to see (or set up a championship people want) they're based solely off of that teams/players performance during that particular moment in time.
So yeah, no more of this "let's make change this bracket so the stream can see the matches they want" just base seeding off of pool results. Obviously, this can be done in a hundred different ways and if anyone wants to discuss this in detail I'd be more than happy to oblige (making brackets and lists are two things I used to obsessively; it was not uncommon for me to hand-write lists and make rankings featuring thousands of items when I was younger). Not saying I'm an expert or that people haven't done a good job, just saying that seeding and bracket making as a whole could use a closer look and I'd be more than happy to contribute to that discussion.
Anyways, I apologize for potentially steering the thread off course. Congratulations to Armada on his success and I wish you well with the rest of your life.