Battle Fire
Smash Rookie
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 4
i know marth and roy will definately be coming back
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
your preety sure that marth and roy will come back,i hate to burst your bubble,but i don not think this statement will hapeni know marth and roy will definately be coming back
Koarin, if you smash as well as you type I don't think anyone should have to worry about playing you online.
And how did they nerf shield-cancelling? Wouldn't it be the same thing? I don't think changing which button you had to use to do it constitutes as "nerfing".
It doesn't seem like you have any problem bursting anyone's bubble. Just playing...your preety sure that marth and roy will come back,i hate to burst your bubble,but i don not think this statement will hapen
Yes, because less than one percent of the players matter more.I actually think the moderate smash players, experienced/expert, and semi-pro and pro players would beat out the scrubs in SSBB character recomendations. Besides, who is lifeless enough to think of a original moveset for a Metroid, lol=? Then again, there are a lot of lifeless zombies in the world who could be bored enough into doing this.....
They have confirmed that not all characters will return. Impossible to tell about l-cancelling and wavedashingcorrect me if i'm wrong, but they have already confermed the 26 returning..less my interweb gossip has failed me yet again...
also, no more l-c's or wd'ing?
[true]
[false]
?
When SSBM came out they changed the name of Z-cancelling to "lag cancelling". You can l-cancel in SSBM with R,L, or Z.I believe L-cancelling will be kept or nerfed it because they nerfed it from SSB64, which was Z-cancelling and they put it in Melee as L-cancelling.
Weaken.What does nerf mean?
Even if a character does return, they're all changing drastically. One slight change and your character might not be as perfect a match for you as another.i just want to keep falco so bad >.<
I couldn't agree with you more.i just want to keep falco so bad >.<
I don't think anyone would disagreeI couldn't agree with you more.
I couldn't agree with you more.
I feel any disagreement would be very disagreeable with amongst us and a mutual agreement would be a most agreeable agreement...?I don't think anyone would disagree
You realy don't pay atention to anything about brawl do you? Sakurai already said that some characters were being removed. It has also been stated that TIERS DON'T MATTER.hmm...honestly i dont think they would take a top-tier character out of brawl...if anything it would be bottom....i also think they're not gonna take any characters out....but add about 5-8 more....they've never takin characters out cuz it risks a chance of someones best character not being in it....
Tiers mean nothing to Sakurai, he's making a game for fun not competition. That's why he's also not putting up leader boards. And they are DEFINITELY taking characters out, Sakurai said it himself. Yes it will be upsetting, yes it will be disappointing, yes it wasn't done from 64 to Melee, but it's going to happen. I heard (rumor!) that Ice Climbers and Mr. Game & Watch were the first to be given the boot. I'm actually decent with Mr. G&W and that was a blow to me, but I'm going to have to live with that. But as long as they don't take out Falco, Marth, Ganondorf, and Sheik (in priority order) I'll be fine.hmm...honestly i dont think they would take a top-tier character out of brawl...if anything it would be bottom....i also think they're not gonna take any characters out....but add about 5-8 more....they've never takin characters out cuz it risks a chance of someones best character not being in it....
Actually, it is. It's entirely compromised of OoT based moves. I honestly don't think it's that hard to come up with a different move for Zelda for her down B (probably using a move inspired from the more recent games, like the light arrows).well...if u wanna get all in depth about it....if look at zeldas skill list from ssbm they are not all from 1 game.
You are, and this is a place designed to debate and discuss opinions. Disagreements are prone to discussion so I don't understand how you had hoped to aviod encountering the Shiek (in/out) argument again after bringing her up in your post.Yea... but Sheik is cooler than Tetra.
Wait wait wait! I said I wasn't going to get involved in this. Sheik for Brawl because I want it. I'm done. I'm entitled to my opinion.
Shiek's moveset, as developed by the experts of Hal Laboratories, was not in-depth or uniquely detailed. Players, particularly those among the pro level, created Shiek's entire strategy and metagame from that point onwards. Based on your statement, every character's moveset recieved an equal amount of work and ingenuity to create and we shouldn't ditch anyone.im not saying they've changed who they are im saying their move sets are not always the same in every game. all im saying is u cant just take out a highly developed character that was basically (move set wise) one of the best in order to try out this new transformation from a new game. if u take out someone with such highly detailed and thought of strategy u might as well take out the basic background of smash. thats how obscure it is. atleast make them seperate characters or sumthin instead of knockin one clear outa the picture
The game of Smash, or of dodging/winning arguments, what exactly? If it's the first one, go to a local tournament or perhaps one in a nearby city. This site is also full of people who would smash you. If it's the latter, I congradulate you on finding the best place to debate smash.****, I'm getting really good at this game. I need some competition here. Anyone interested?