Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm seriously not trying to offend you here, but I prefer the current, argue over everything-style SSB4 thread to you rfantasy version, which would look like this:
I would like to give my honest opinion, but your and RickyPro's defensiveness pretty much forbids me.
NO!
My mom doesn't allow me to have wi-fi. At all. So, it's a no go on the DLC concept for me.
Truth. On both accounts.Being teased by DLC...I find it cruel, rather. I prefer to have the game's entire content in physical media, you know? It's more gratifying that way.
For the record, I also want to see Goemon as well, but I'll be patient. VERY patient (besides, there are plenty of upcoming games to interest and keep me busy).
Dr. Mario definitely has moveset potential.
There still are more games featuring Yoshi then there are featuring DK.
They didn't even team up in the game they were in >_> At least Diddy and Dixie did.
If Captain Syrup appears in another game, proving Shake It! wasn't a "cameo", then I'll agree.
I wasn't even aware of a Japanese Poll, and Rick hasn't appeared in a while because the Kirby games (as of recently) have been either remakes, racing, or coded from remakes.
In a way, yes. If it makes them completely different from the other fighters that's good enough for a slot. (Although this won't apply to all characters, of course.)
Thanks, knew I could count on you,
Mother (the series) is over, so they might as well represent Ninten or go back to only having Ness.
They've had twice as many games as Metroid has in the past four-six years.
Star Fox (during Melee) says hi.
Isn't that a little wierd? and why is B> a waste of a slot if B basically does the same thing?
No rule was instated that confirmed that only one character from any 3rd-party company may be playable in Smash Bros.
He was popular enough to make a cameo in 2003.
64 didn't have enough characters, so they made up that with Melee. Brawl didn't have enough characters . . . . .You're arguing against yourself here. If we get less characters than expected your roster is even less reasonable.
Those aren't retro if all of them (sans Ray)had first appeared in 2000 or after.
*deals with it, groveling for a wasted slot*
Proof pl0x. And don't count the spinoff games, they really have no determination on the roster.
I don't see your logic here.
You think that's weird? Check out MYM. 97% of the movesets there have uniqueness and originality out the ***.
Going through the trouble to add a second banana for a THIRD-PARTY SERIES doesn't seem too logical to me.
He was referring to your choices.
I have thought logically. Tingle is perfect for AT.
true. But about half of them are movesets that are not really viable. They are original and fit the moveset criteria, but they are also very unrealistic at times.
Would Sakurai realize it?UberMario said:
Unless you're counting the roles of generic Yoshis in spinoffs and mainstream platformers, no there aren't. DK also sells much better than Yoshi as a series.
That's because Nana was part of multiplayer, she couldn't be controlled with Popo for multiplayer to be multiplayer. And while they weren't directly together, they certainly could be said to be together. Diddy and Dixie teamed up only once, and for the SNES. (The Ice Climbers are retro, so they break rules of recentness)
Yeah, Gooey got more votes on the Japanese poll that measured a small portion of the Japanese fanbase which is a portion of the fanbase as a whole. I'd hardly say that means anything. Besides, does it matter why Gooey hasn't been in games recently? What matters is that he hasn't been in games recently and so he is not recent, not that he could have been in.
Moveset potential is fine and dandy but it doesn't make completely obscure characters deserving. Smash is first to showcase Nintendo, and interesting characters aren't as important (otherwise we might have gotten Olimar, ICs and PT earlier). Also, read an MYM moveset and tell me that some characters don't have moveset potential. We had a moveset for a bagel once. The seventh-place winner of MYM4 was Mach Rider, a guy who rides around on a motorcycle. >_>
If it's over, what's the point in giving it another rep in the first place?
And yet many of these games were Japan-only. Besides, number of games isn't as important as sales.
Falco was added as a last minute clone without a regard for a balanced roster.
Not as weird as ROB. The B would make a garbage block over the opponent, and the B> would launch a panel with unique effects depending on color.
It's pretty simple logic: third parties take extra time to obtain legal rights to and so it's better to spread it out. Besides, Sonic and Snake are guests, they may not even return. Due to their popularity it's unlikely to happen, but more would really be pushing it. Remember that Smash is about Nintendo.
In 2003. If anything, his cameo shows how greedy SE is: he was never even named as Geno, and briefly showed up at all, and SE still demanded a mention in the credits.
Of course there were new characters. That's something you do with fighting games. I'm saying that because we have gotten less characters than expected, it's likely that we may not get 50, a number commonly agreed upon, much less 60.
I wasn't saying they were. I was saying that the characters you mentioned (Mach Rider and some other ones) were.
Tingle is not a wasted slot...
Thanks.
I agree, great and horrifically underrated series. I wonder if the absence of Wario Land stuff has more to do with Yokoi no longer being alive more than anything else. I kind of get the feeling that's why all the Mario Land games are kind of neglected too. In a way, I think Nintendo kind of feels guilty for how Yokoi was viewed by his peers near the end of his life thanks to the Virtual Boy.Well, whatever SSB4's roster will look like, I hope that one will get better representation in the trophy and sticker department.
I mean, honestly. Who in the world ignores the existence of the entire Wario Land series (it got a few stickers, but still)!?
Fawful is the main villan of Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story.
I doubt Ryu would get in since our unofficial rule states that there can only be one character per comany and Megaman would be the first choice. However, I'll be as giddy as a schoolgirl if Nintendo vs. Capcom is ever announced.
Have you tried using projectiles against him? (Especially when he ducks). They're blocked by his shield. Unless you mean you want him to cover his head . . . . .
Honestly, that shield is more KO efficient than the Master Sword.
omg yes.
Since when is being the main villan in one game, a boss in a second, and an antagonist not deemed "important"?
When Sakurai doesn't even know who he is...
Fifteen minutes? Since when is 3 games "15 minutes"? Especially for a series that's getting a new game this year.
If you're referring to Tingle, fine I see no reason not for him to be included.
I was referring to Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario...
T=Roundhouse Kick S=Power StompB=Bullet Bill Ride 
Sakurai said regardless of how popular Waluigi is, he doesn't have much of a role besides being a party game character. So he made him into an AT