Pieman0920
Smash Master
Well if Spyder was right and there were only 45 character slots, the total number of PCs should be at least 50.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Fawful huh, now that would be pretty cool. He has been in every Mario and Luigi game that has come out, not to mention it would be hilarious (with the right voice actor) if he started repeating some of his lines from the game. "Mustard of doom"!Geno is obscure and very unworthy. Like others have said, better representatives for the Mario RPG subseries would be Paper Mario or Fawful.
*coughSlimeorBlackMagecough*In addition, there are probably better Square reps as well.
Just sayin'.
As I previously said, GDC 08 pretty much destroyed most of the notions that we held dear when it came to characters. One of the biggest ones was the idea of significance. It pains me to say this since I said the opposite so often before Brawl came out, but significance is probably one of the last things on Sakurai's mind (even though it shouldn't) when deciding characters. As I said, he pretty much has stated multiple times that what he mostly cares about is whether or not they can hold his interest and "bring something new to the table" which is why we're still staring at Jigglypuff and pretty much why characters like Pit, Mr. Game and Watch, Ness, and the Ice Climbers were added despite being obscure and the stars of games that pretty much sold crap compared to the likes of the big guys. For God's sake, the man added Dr. Mario in Melee simply because he liked his theme. The idea of who's "worthy" has pretty much been revealed to be something fabricated by the fans.Geno is obscure and very unworthy. Like others have said, better representatives for the Mario RPG subseries would be Paper Mario or Fawful. Overall, I would say the best options for the fifth playable Mario character would be Paper Mario, Toad, and Bowser Jr. I would gladly elaborate on these if someone wanted me to.
Also, Sakurai NEVER said that he regretted adding the clones from Melee.
Compared to Mallow, Smithy, Booster, and so forth, Geno is the most well received. I cannot state that enough.Huh? If he's so well received over other content, then why is he not showing up, while other things are? If he really was popular enough to make it into Smash, he would have been playable in these games, or at the very least a cameo, but in the end he wasn't which makes me wonder how well received you think this guy is.
Fair enough.Sakurai's journal is suspect at best, seeing as not everything was actually translated over for us. On top of that, even if you use the fact that five people mentioned him in their requests, that doesn't change the fact that it was only five people out of how many votes were shown.
Fair enough.Using the basis that he has only shown up in one game isn't a valid argument against Geno, but everything that's added on top of it is what hurts him. In addition, basing that decisions go only through Sakurai's mind isn't a good thing to argue at this point, as we don't actually know who the director of Smash 4 will be, or even if the game will ever exist.
Geno doesn't have history now?Whatever the case, its pretty clear he goes for characters that have history, and represent their series well, which is something that Geno doesn't do.
I said it before, but why can't Geno be the secondary face of the Mario RPGs. The RPGs themselves were born from two companies, Square and Nintendo. Like two sides of a single coin, Mario can represent the Nintendo half whilst Geno the other. He'd be like Luigi in terms of being second.Heck, saying Geno could possibly represent a series is faulty in itself, as he'd only represent a single game in a series with loads of others.
This is subjective talk...What? Three reps matter because the game itself is represented well enough as it is. Maybe music could be thrown in, since none of that in the Smash series, but as far as characters are concerend, there's no need to add more, since it is well covered already.
If the demand was there, then perhaps.Its like saying that Marx should be added or something...if Marx was third party.
I said before that I'm not a believer in trends, and I stand by that.In addition, age is a factor, since the majority of games that are represented in Brawl were from the span inbetween SSBM and SSBB. Games that were not though were retro games from the NES days or earlier. Outside of music, there was really no SNES or N64 representation, and if the current trend continues, they'll be skipped over again, with the GC added with them.
How so?Don't even compare Sonic's demand to Geno's. It'll only make you look dumb.
I'll give you Geno's current position in the franchise, but Geno has a history―he wouldn't exist otherwise. And "amount of games" is by no means a legitimate reason. I'm not sure why you keep bringing that up.In addition, their positions in their own franchises, amount of games, and the history they have are complete opposites of one another.
Sure do, seeing how most of the characters on Sakurai's Journal who have entries three and above are in SSBB.Five kids from Japan, and two dozen or so people on the internet sure do influence a lot of games, don't they?
Yes.What are you talking about? You're saying some other type of legal issue is what's bogging him down or something?
How can a character that appears in one game get into Smash Bros. when he doesn't appear in another?In that case, then he is suffering from that. Seriously, how do you think he can get into a Smash Bros game, if he can't get into any of these new RPGs, aka the genre he's known for?
Geno (5 entries)How were they good?
"Never?"Face it, Geno never had a chance for Brawl, and unless his act gets straightend up, his chances are even worse for SSB4.
Honestly, we just have to wait and see. There's nothing more I can say.The amount of characters are indeed less than before, but as time goes on, more and more characters are created, or expanded upon. That's not happening for Geno though, as his one game, which has already been represented, is just getting older and older.
I've explained why I think his chances would be a tad better than they were when Brawl was being developed. And Luigi never starred in his own game until Luigi's Mansion, yet he appeared in SSB as a playable character. That fact is beneficial for Geno.Actually, I believe his chances will be worse. First of all, he was never close to getting into the game, there were copyright issues between Nintedno and Square Enix that wouldn't allow it. Plus, Geno will be 5 to 6 years older by the time we see SSB4. Sure, hes old like retro characters, but they were classics, Geno is from a single SNES game that he wasn't even the star of.
I was never really a proponent for Paper Mario, but I see what you're saying. Although, I would think that Geno would be more unique given the fact that he isn't Mario.There is Link, and there is Toon Link. Mario and Paper Mario are in the same boat, but Paper Mario can be given a unique moveset with the hammer and the spindash, etc.
Paper Mario and Geno are in the same series. Appearing in more than one game is fine, but this doesn't significantly diminish Geno's chance of appearing.Plus, Paper Mario has more games than Geno
Ice Climbers is no longer being made. How did they manage to appear in Melee?and his games are still being made.
Says who?Paper Mario still has low chances, and Geno would never get in before Paper Mario.
True, there can only be one (HMW lol) or none.And theres no way we're seeing two new Mario-RPG reps in SSB4.
A million times yes! Goodness, that'd probably be like the best stage ever. Seriously.Agreed on this. If the Mario-RPGs get represented at all, this should at least be there representation.
I'd rather not, thank you. ;DDon't believe in trends? Well, start believin'.
Nothing is guaranteed. That's not being very "realistic" as you put it.Upper 45+ is what we'll see almost guaranteed, but anymore than 50 just won't happen.
There were a few factors which, I believe, added to us not seeing as many characters. Time-constraints being one of the major issues.SSB64: 12 +13 = Melee: 25 + 10 = Brawl: 35 + ???
The ??? could be anywhere from 8 to 13, maybe 14 if we're lucky. Don't over-estimate it. Remember what happened with Brawl.
You can be pessimistic if you want, but that doesn't mean you're being realistic. (I too play Melee more than Brawl. Haven't played it in months, actually. Just putting that out there. lol)Why would I? Because I'm different than everyone else here in that I like to look at things realistically. Before Brawl came out, I gave into the hype and I had myself convinced that there were going to be over 50 characters and what happened when Brawl came out? Extremely disappointed, Brawl is now one of my least played games (Melee is my most played). I expected too much.
In your reality, perhaps, but that's not true for everyone. Sakurai (or whoever is developing SSB4) could very well be thinking otherwise. You never know.I'm not going to tell myself there are over 50 characters in the game when in reality, we'll be lucky to get over 43.
And I do agree with the second statement.
I think you need to accept the fact that you could be under-estimating it, just as I've accepted that I could very well be over-estimating it. That's thinking realistically.I know I'm not under estimating it. I've seen this before at places like Nsider, where the hype was huge. People knew we would get around 50 characters in Brawl, but what did we get? Just over 30.
Don't put me in the same group as others, please.Now the same is happening with SSB4. I'd say 50 AT MOST, but the chances of 50 are still extremely low. People like you are too prone to being so passionate about things that you nearly convince yourself it has to be true. I'm not trying to be mean or anything, just telling it how I see it.
I HAVE FURY!!!Fawful huh, now that would be pretty cool. He has been in every Mario and Luigi game that has come out, not to mention it would be hilarious (with the right voice actor) if he started repeating some of his lines from the game. "Mustard of doom"!
But, I still think I want Paper Mario more.
Eh, I guess it's just all the Geno talk that's been going around lately ... ****'s making me delirious.Fawful's popularity doesn't really pale in comparison to Geno's. If you go outside of these boards, more people would recognize Fawful, and prefer him over Geno, who they probably wouldn't have heard of.
Geno's fans are just more vocal, much like how Wolf was more popular than Krystal, yet Krystal's fans put up a bigger hooplah. Truth be told, Wolf's biggest accomplishment in Brawl was ****blocking Krystal.Eh, I guess it's just all the Geno talk that's been going around lately ... ****'s making me delirious.
It's just that Geno's fanbase is a lot more... err... what's the word I'm looking for? Vocal? I mean, Fawful might be more well-known than Geno, but I'm not sure that means he has a larger fanbase.
Yes, Geno has a more vocal fanbase, although I'm not sure about size. If you want a good idea of Fawful's fanbase, look at the sales of Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga. Everybody I know ho played the game loved Fawful. Also, Fawful is a recurring character, is more recent than Geno, is owned by Nintendoand wouldn't be too hard to make a moveset for.Eh, I guess it's just all the Geno talk that's been going around lately ... ****'s making me delirious.
It's just that Geno's fanbase is a lot more... err... what's the word I'm looking for? Vocal? I mean, Fawful might be more well-known than Geno, but I'm not sure that means he has a larger fanbase.
The only Mario characters that I say have a realistic chance as of the present of becoming playable are Paper Mario, Bowser Jr., and Toad. All three though have things going against them though.Yes, Geno has a more vocal fanbase, although I'm not sure about size. If you want a good idea of Fawful's fanbase, look at the sales of Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga. Everybody I know ho played the game loved Fawful. Also, Fawful is a recurring character, is more recent than Geno, is owned by Nintendoand wouldn't be too hard to make a moveset for.
Plus, Sakurai has had the notion of Fawful thrown at him before.
So I'd say Fawful has a decent chance.
Yeah. I think Mario and Luigi 3 has already outsold Mario & Luigi 2 in Japan.I don't think Toad has a good chance. Mostly because there's no longer Toad, there's Toads. Plus most of his moveset would have to come from nowhere. I know that's been done before, but it really hurts Toad's chances.
Fawful's popularity will rise when Bowser's Inside Story is out in the US, but the game's already out in Japan, I believe. The Japanese popularity matters more than the American, so we'll have to see how he's doing over there.
You could be right.EDIT: @ScoobyCafe, I don't think F-Zero is significant enough to get two reps. At this point, I'm not even sure if two are necessary.
Glad to see people here are much more smarted then the ones I've encountered before.Metroid DEFINITELY needs at least one more rep and the "Ridley's 2 big" argument is a really tired and absurd one.
Both?If Yoshi gets another rep (I sincerely doubt it will), it'll be the Baby Mario Bros. (whose inclusion might depend on that of Paper Mario, being that two extra Marios is a little outrageous) and Kamek.
Even if that is the case, keep in mind, that the Yoshi series will likely never be getting a second character unless it rebounds in a huge way in popularity.Baby Bros have a better chance than Kamek because they're more unique. There are a lot of Magikoopas, but surprisingly few Italian infants with hammers in the Mario universe. Kamek would have an equal chance to the Baby Bros, but Partners in Time gave the Baby Bros a much bigger boost than it did Kamek, as they were playable and they were just as important as the adult Mario Bros.
True. Yoshi's Island hasn't been very popular as of late. Although it could get a boost from all the Yoshi-riding in Galaxy 2.Even if that is the case, keep in mind, that the Yoshi series will likely never be getting a second character unless it rebounds in a huge way in popularity.
Compared to other MRPG originals, sure he's the most popular, but as the game already has three reps, more representation isn't really needed. And sure he's not popular enough. If he really did have the fan demand that could get him into Brawl, he would have had the fan demand to get him into another Mario RPG, or into one of the Mario/SE cross over games. The fact is, that whatever popularity he does have, its not strong enough to make developers change their minds, even when there is a situation where there are no legal issues to go around.Compared to Mallow, Smithy, Booster, and so forth, Geno is the most well received. I cannot state that enough.
I'm not sure why he hasn't appeared in a recent title, but I'm positive it's not due to him not being popular enough, SMRPG content-wise.
Bad choice of words on my part, but in comparison to other characters, he doesn't have as much history within respects to the series that he is supposed to be representing.Geno doesn't have history now?
Because he doesn't represent the RPGs. He was in a secondary chaaracter in one of them. Paper Mario is a much better representative due to the three Paper Mario games that followed, and Fawful would be better for the three M&L games, if they needed representation. And if Square were to have represetation, then there are dozens of better characters to choose from than Geno.I said it before, but why can't Geno be the secondary face of the Mario RPGs. The RPGs themselves were born from two companies, Square and Nintendo. Like two sides of a single coin, Mario can represent the Nintendo half whilst Geno the other. He'd be like Luigi in terms of being second.
That's a horrible analogy. Geno doesn't come close to representing his series, or even the RPG spin off series in the same way that Metaknight or Dedede represent the Kirby series. Plus, a situation involving those two would be better suited for how many reps does the Kirby series need, and when decided upon, uses the next most logical character to represent the series, rather than some obscure one game third party character.This is subjective talk
There are people who think otherwise, made evident by supporters and the poll. Granted, what you said previously could very well be true, but still, the fact remains that he was a top contender there. One could say that the inclusion of Meta-Knight in SSBB represented the Kirby franchise well enough, yet, lo and behold, DDD is a playable character.
Doesn't change how likely it is.I said before that I'm not a believer in trends, and I stand by that.
You're kidding, right? There's no way you're such a Geno fan boy that it blinds you into thinking that Geno's popularity or demand is on the level of Sonic's. And their situations are no simmilar, as one is a mainstream star of multiple video games, instead of the secondary character of one spinoff series game.How so?
Their situations are quite similar. If people demand him enough, who's to say Geno won't appear in SSB4 similarly to how Sonic is in SSBB?
I keep on bringing it up, because it maters here. The Mario series is a long running one, with many games, and many characters, most of which reoccur. Geno's situation of being a one game character is hurt by this, because there are so many other and better and more important reoccuring characters from within the series that you're saying he should represent. If he were in a series like Mother, LoZ, or FE, where there are few reoccuring characters due to shifts in time/reality, then his one game nature could be excused, but that's simply not the case.I'll give you Geno's current position in the franchise, but Geno has a history―he wouldn't exist otherwise. And "amount of games" is by no means a legitimate reason. I'm not sure why you keep bringing that up.
His popularity is only on internet message boards, and has had no real impact in getting him more roles. I'm pretty confident that its much smaller than you've been lead to believe because of that. And the jounal entries were unreliable to cite due to how they were compiled here, and its pointless to even bring up at this point, seeing as Brawl is out. Maybe next time when there's another poll you can bring that up for your Geno arguments, but as it stands, those five people didn't get him into Brawl.Sure do, seeing how most of the characters on Sakurai's Journal who have entries three and above are in SSBB.
And let's not pussyfoot around. Geno is popular as far as the Mario RPGs are concerned. You're basically saying, "Hey! Stop! Don't believe what you're seeing. He's actually not popular at all. It's all an illusion.. (echo)."
I sincerely mean no offense when I say this, but if you're that delusional, then there's not point in continuing this discussion.
With the exception of Sheik, who is basically Zelda anyways, all characters who have only shown up in one game were limited due to the nature of their series, be it one that doesn't continue the same story line from game to game, or their series simply ended there. In addition there were no charactes that represented the series better. These things make the difference that make Geno's chances nigh impossible, yet for some reason you keep on thinking as if these problems are apart form each other. They aren't.How can a character that appears in one game get into Smash Bros. when he doesn't appear in another?
People make the difference.
Five people wanted Geno. That doesn't mean that his chances were good. His chances were always bad. He always had the legal probems, and he always had to deal with the better representatives of the Mario series. He also has to deal with the possiblity that there will be no more representatives to the Mario series, since it seems to have hit the rut that the Kirby series has, where all the main bases have been covered, but that's a different issue.Geno (5 entries)
You can discredit that all you want, but it's there, and should be considered proof that his chances were good at best.
He also said that popular characters don't interest Sakurai, and the only thing Geno fans have that can get him in is his "popularity." Of course given how his fans can't get him into any more games, I don't think his popularity is that high at all, but since you think it is, I can't help but wonder how you interperate that statement."Never?"
Again with the fallacious statements. I'm not sure why you're denying him the fact that he did indeed had a chance at making it into Brawl. He had a good shot before, and due to what Fatmanonice posted concerning the "backlist" theory, I say his chances are a bit better for SSB4.
No it isn't. Luigi was and is a main character of his series. Geno isn't. Luigi had appeared in more than one game. Geno hadn't. Luigi wasn't third party. Geno is.I've explained why I think his chances would be a tad better than they were when Brawl was being developed. And Luigi never starred in his own game until Luigi's Mansion, yet he appeared in SSB as a playable character. That fact is beneficial for Geno.
I think it should in the form of Samurai Goroh. Of course that means that a pottential katana moveset would go to him, instead of Takamaru, so I'm not sure how much you'd like that.I Let's discuss F-Zero, Metroid, and Yoshi for a few minutes. I hear that people are torn between Samurai Goroh and Black Shadow for the next F-Zero rep. Well, why not both? The F-Zero series hasn't had a new rep since SSB. Nothing but Falcon for the past three games. To even things out, should F-Zero get two reps?
Most don't. Some do. I'm in the camp that he isn't too big, and can be resized because....well he really can. Look at Bowser for instance, and how large he is in Sunshine. He's almost Kraid size really.The only hot-topic that I know of concerning Metroid is Ridley's inclusion. People here don't think he's too big to gain entry, right?
@ Spydr Enzo
Your trend-thing is a bit off, because there are more newcomers htan that in Brawl.
Really, it should look like this:
SSB64: 12+14=Melee: 26-4+17=Brawl: 39
Transformations should be counted as separate characters because:
1) Sakurai considers them to be separate. According to Sakurai, Melee has 26 characters, Brawl has 39.
2) A transformation takes an equal amount of time to produce as a normal character.
3) Just because they don't have a spot on the Character Select Screen is not a good enough reason. Zero Suit Samus is completely distinct from Samus. You will likely never see a person switch between the two in a match (unless you play with Smash Balls). They are completely different characters. Why should they count as one?
Okay, but changing 25 to 26 and changing 35 to 39 really isn't much of a difference anyway, so I guess it doesn't matter. And If we did count the transformations, it would look like this:You weren't on/didn't notice this earlier so I thought I'd bring it back up.
Little Mac has infinitely superior chances to Balloon fighter, thanks to the Remake on Wii. I've also heard that Sakurai has said that he wouldn't make a Ballon Fighter moveset, but I don't know how accurate that is.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Geno+brawl&search_type=&aq=fFive kids in Japan does not mean Geno is wanted. Celice got nearly the same number of votes back during the Melee poll.
That is all. I know it shakes you at the core knowing that Geno isn't that popular FatMan, but its the truth.
Ouch.I see that you overlooked the official Melee poll. I see that your Geno fanboyism is blinding you. Geno is VERY UNLIKELY. DEAL WITH IT.
Super Mario series
(1) Koopa: 169 (Bowser)
(2) Princess Peach: 66
(3) Wario: 65
(4) Kinopio: 27 (Toad)
(5) Nokonoko: 9 (Koopa Troopa)
(6) Kamec: 8 (Magikoopa)
(7) Kuribou: 7 (Goomba)
(8) Mallow (Mario RPG): 5
(8) Geno (Mario RPG): 5
(10) Baby Mario: 3
By FatMan's logic, Goomba is more wanted as a playable character than Geno.
Whenever cut characters are brought into these debates, I tend to get a bit confused... So you could have a good point, I'll look into that a bit more and see if I can come up with a reasonable solution...You have to account for the fact that 5 characters were removed from Melee. I only count 4 as being removed because Young Link and Toon Link are pretty much the same.
Brawl had 17 newcomers:
Diddy
Wario
ZSS
Pit
ROB
Meta Knight
Dedede
Olimar
Wolf
Squirtle
Ivysaur
Charizard
Lucario
Ike
Lucas
Snake
Sonic
and 12+11 =/= 26
so +14 and +17 average out to +15.5,
I don't know how many spots would be onn the CSS, but following your trend puts the number of characters over 50.
I don't know, Sakurai has wanted Balloon Fighter in since Melee, and according to his list of retro characters, he would be next on the list. Yes, Little Mac's chances are boosted up due to his new game, but his chances weren't to good to begin with like Balloon Fighter's were. Mac's game has boosted him up to about the same level as Balloon Fighter.Balloon Fighter's chances are not on the same level as Mac's in my eyes, since Sakurai already said he couldn't think of a way that BF would fight, and in contrast, Mac is a fighter who just had a new game. Sakurai's comments aside, BF does have his chances (though they are hurt a bit by Tingle a little bit) I don't think they can be said to be even with Mac's.
Despite the fact that I even mentioned Melee both in the context and of pre and post release but go ahead and read only what you want to read and nerd rage all the same. Also, you addressed NOTHING that was actually said in my post aside from pointing out how I clearly and without a shadow of a doubt proved you wrong concerning your comment of how Geno is unpopular and virtually unknown. Honestly, if a video that's essentially ear **** can attract more than 1.5 million views simply by proposing the horrifically illogical idea that Geno could be unlocked via a glitch then that definately says something about the character especially when it's extremelly unlikely that any sane person would watch it more than once. Again, it should also be noted that most of the videos I posted on those two pages, went into the high thousands which again, proves that you're actually speaking from your own fanboyism while I can actually back up my arguements while you let your arms and legs go limp and lean back on rote.I see that you overlooked the official Melee poll. I see that your Geno fanboyism is blinding you. Geno is VERY UNLIKELY. DEAL WITH IT.
Super Mario series
(1) Koopa: 169 (Bowser)
(2) Princess Peach: 66
(3) Wario: 65
(4) Kinopio: 27 (Toad)
(5) Nokonoko: 9 (Koopa Troopa)
(6) Kamec: 8 (Magikoopa)
(7) Kuribou: 7 (Goomba)
(8) Mallow (Mario RPG): 5
(8) Geno (Mario RPG): 5
(10) Baby Mario: 3
By FatMan's logic, Goomba is more wanted as a playable character than Geno.
Fatman, I just wanted to know, out of the Balloon Fighter and Mac, who do you think Sakurai would choose for the new retro character?A big wall of very well thought out text...
HAHAHAHHAH! Keeping spinning that you are not spinning for Geno.Despite the fact that I even mentioned Melee both in the context and of pre and post release but go ahead and read only what you want to read and nerd rage all the same. Also, you addressed NOTHING that was actually said in my post aside from pointing out how I clearly and without a shadow of a doubt proved you wrong concerning your comment of how Geno is unpopular and virtually unknown. Honestly, if a video that's essentially ear **** can attract more than 1.5 million views simply by proposing the horrifically illogical idea that Geno could be unlocked via a glitch then that definately says something about the character especially when it's extremelly unlikely that any sane person would watch it more than once. Again, it should also be noted that most of the videos I posted on those two pages, went into the high thousands which again, proves that you're actually speaking from your own fanboyism while I can actually back up my arguements while you let your arms and legs go limp and lean back on rote.
Also, I can post the Melee poll results and, since this seems to be a contest of who can copy and paste the best, too and I can even post all the characters mentioned in the Brawl journal:
Thanks for giving me the oppurtunity to prove you wrong, once again, and show you how to actually debate with competence. Below are all five entries in Japanese, "engrish" and with an english summary.HAHAHAHHAH! Keeping spinning that you are not spinning for Geno.
Here are some facts , when I was writing my journal in regards to character to prospects for Smash 4, I noticed that many of these character suggestions were actually grouped together in the listings (meaning that more than one character was listed per entry), also moreover, not all the listings that mentioned Geno talked about wanting Geno as a playable character, but rather the Forest Maze. Remember, there were three things that fans wrote for Sakurai under the Brawl journal:
1. "The character that wants inserted" (lol engrish"
2. "The song that wants inserted"
3. "Thoughts"
The people that compiled the lisiting merely tried to find the character's name throughout all of the entires, regardless of what the entry was actually for.
Some of the suggestions for Geno were actually for the music of Geno's debut local, the Forest Maze.