HK Donut of the Blue Fire
Smash Ace
its all mudkipz, all the time!.....yeah mudkipz....yeah...
OMG MUDKIPS IN SMAHS!??!
OMG MUDKIPS IN SMAHS!??!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
OH SNAP!no...no he doesnt...he was a one time shot and F***ed it up! he shouldnt return i havent even played MGS4 but i bet you he didnt return in that. who ever put him in smash should be "smashed" with an ore and then tied to a chair while we interrogate him with mudkipz! hes out of place he has no cartoon like charm like everyone else, and he uses weapons based on real weapons (or actual real weapons im no specialist!).
hey super man? get real your more like a super fanboy! i can crush any snake any day even while sleeping
Not Kyogre. Best Pokemon in the game right there.Hypa-Link said:Oh and make the legendary Pokemon SEEM freakin Legendary.
They are so **** rare to get, and when they come they are almost on the same level as a Gulpin or a Starmie or something.
Well, what I'm saying is that...I mean, how many times do you want to buy the same game, and play as the same characters, with 10-15 new ones?25% Nintendo? That'd be sorta cool, but won't happen. lol
MvC2's roster size is justified because you HAVE to pick three characters, and barring non-tourney console play, each character has to be different. Same goes for CvS2, though you can play as one character or two if you really wanted (which isn't recommended anyway).Cutting is never good tho. I know people that want a Marvel vs. capcom type roster, and that won't happen with characters being cut.
I'm saying exactly that: cut characters and add lots of 3rd party characters.lol, no, but.
I'ma big Nintendo fan.
And if this happened it wouldn't be a wii exclusive.
Which wouldn't be good for Nintendo.
Unless you are saying cut some characters and add lotsa 3rd party ones.
Cutting is never good tho. I know people that want a Marvel vs. capcom type roster, and that won't happen with characters being cut.
Also, most 3rd parties would be stingy and ask for too much just to include them in the game.
Nintendo and Sakura have a great relationship with Sega and the Metal gear creator.
Which is why snake and Sonic are there.
Everyone else wouldn't be worth it, or would be too difficult to get.
I'm saying exactly that: cut characters and add lots of 3rd party characters.
And truthfully, we don't know how the third-parties would work out. Some of them might let their characters be used completely gratis--there's no such thing as bad publicity, after all. And we don't know how Sonic got in. SEGA might have been paid to allow it to happen, but one thing's for sure: he was only in there from the ridiculous fan demand.
And you didn't seriously just tell me that Viewtiful Joe isn't worth any amount of effort. You did not, sir.
Anyway, it's just an idea. It'd definitely mix things up, right? At least gimme that. And you'd totally still buy it.
Yes they are human but they are animated more in some sort of cartoony or animated style. Snake has more realistical PS2 type graphics, and that is why some people say Snake doesn't fit in Brawl with the likes of Kirby and other cartoony characters.Captain falcon is a human.
So is Link and Ganondorf, hahaha.
A+B would be a new move for every character.
The only people that fit that bill are Luigi and Mario. ZOMG A 2 CHARACTUR SMASH BROZ?! AWSUMZ!11!@@2!Personally, I would love the complete removal of 3rd party character and make it all-nintendo, like it should be. It's called Super Smash BROTHERS for a reason. Like they're all part of a family.
I say include them. Franchises such as Metal Gear, Megaman, and Ninja Gaiden (The second two need representation as well, IMO) all owe their success to their beginnings with Nintendo.Personally, I would love the complete removal of 3rd party character and make it all-nintendo, like it should be. It's called Super Smash BROTHERS for a reason. Like they're all part of a family.
You lost all credibility when you suggested that Shadow could be his own character (I daresay that Shadow is, in fact, the faker).I would like every character thats ever been in Smash to return at least as an alternate costume (Dr. Mario a mario costume, Young Link a Toon Link costume, etc.) and Shadow the Hedgehog to at least be a Sonic costume, if not his own character.
Snake, MK, R.O.B., and GW should be nerfed, C. Falcon buffed, Gannon a new moveset, and the transformations for Zelda and Pokemon Trainer sped up.
Also, I'm all for third parties, but in all honesty Megaman is not that big a deal. He's like a third-party version of Pit in importance to Nintendo History. Of course, I am a little biased as I never played his games...
what! you mean to say you want to cut out some of the greatest video game icons such as Megaman and Sonic? if that happened then it wouldn't truly be a smash where some of the best get together to duke it out, so you FAIL!Personally, I would love the complete removal of 3rd party character and make it all-nintendo, like it should be. It's called Super Smash BROTHERS for a reason. Like they're all part of a family.
Personally, I would love the complete removal of 3rd party character and make it all-nintendo, like it should be. It's called Super Smash BROTHERS for a reason. Like they're all part of a family.
what! you mean to say you want to cut out some of the greatest video game icons such as Megaman and Sonic? if that happened then it wouldn't truly be a smash where some of the best get together to duke it out, so you FAIL!
No. By 'Brothers' I meant different games while staying in the Nintendo realm. You can't tell me that Megaman and Sonic are as close to Mario as DK or Pikachu are. Masterchief is also a great gaming protagonist, should he be added? Why don't they just throw in Marcus Fenix too? Goldeneye 007 was an awesome game, so shouldn't James Bond be put in the next SSB? I hope you see what I'm getting at. We can't just throw in every game character because people like them, it takes the spotlight away from the Nintendo stars for whom the game features.The only people that fit that bill are Luigi and Mario. ZOMG A 2 CHARACTUR SMASH BROZ?! AWSUMZ!11!@@2!
(That means your idea fails. Smash Brothers was meant to be a game showcasing some of gamings greatest heroes duking it out. Some third party characters will be needed.)
I totally agree with you. I guess I can be lenient with Sonic because now he's pretty much Nintendo now anyway and everybody knows him. I had no idea who Snake was until his inclusion in Brawl.mariofanpm12 said:i dont think the third party characters should extend beyond snake and sonic
i just dont like the thought of a bunch of random(even if popular) characters interfering in a Nintendo based game.
Sonic, yeah sure he's fine. He almost fits perfectly since he and Mario starred together before and he's a majorely wanted icon for smash.
Snake, well they begged for him to be in melee, so he deserves a spot in brawl.
but all the third party guest may unbalance the game.
If people want megaman in, then what'd happen if he was in but he sucked? you know, low or bottom tier? people would riot.
so to avoid this, nintendo would make third party characters really good( or cheap) like they did with snake, to make their guest appearance count.
with a bunch of 3rd party characters,a ll of whom were good, it'd take the spotlight from nintendo's star characters, both in casual and professional eyes.
colossal Phail...what! you mean to say you want to cut out some of the greatest video game icons such as Megaman and Sonic? if that happened then it wouldn't truly be a smash where some of the best get together to duke it out, so you FAIL!