Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
How about giving him an icon of Exor's handle/face? That gigantic sword seems to be iconic enough to be Geno's symbol.
Explain to me exactly how the spacies are clones? They have some similarities, but Fox, Falco, and Wolf are three completely different characters.
Well for the next one. Deathborn would fit great as the main antagonist. I made this thing up that he was the one who created Tabuu. So Deathborn should be the main villain.
It's fun! But it would have been better if possible tripping while doing a Final Smash.
It is a shame. Hopefully, she WILL have another rep from the series to duel with in the next game. Sylux would be acceptable, since we don't even know what his beef with Samus is.
Your assumptions are only speculation, darkserenade. That is the way it was during the Melee era. That may change during the Brawl era, darkserenade. I have heard similar assumptions at IGN about how Fire Emblem will be represented numerous times, saying at most 3 characters, but that is only speculation. I can assure you that this prediction will come false. You cannot really shoot down these predictions you mentioned easily, as if Fire Emblem sales will end up like they were during the Melee era. Also, it is too early to predict on how much Fire Emblem will be represented, as Fire Emblem is new to the U.S. market and Brawl has been recently released. It is too early to predict what SSB4 will be like. The assumptions are solely based on how Brawl was like. One other thing is that you are using Fire Emblem's sales figures as a measurement of representation potential. It is a bad idea, given that the first six Fire Emblem games were marketed exclusively in Japan.
)
I wasn't talking about sales, I was talking popularity. Half the people on this thread can help me with this, since we were talking about how much FE derserves(me protecting it), and, as you might guess, not many liked it. Besides, random FE characters wouldn't work, because we haven't even seen Samus get one.
Those rental units need attack animations and a weapon and they're good to go. SSB holds much more data, because they need multiple animations and attacks, so, unfortunately, Melee might be your last game unless you lighten up a bit.
Brawl was only on a single-layered Wii disc. By the time SSB4 has an official Website, technological advances will make downloadable content possible. I have seen many recent newcomers to the Fire Emblem franchise myself. The outcome and predictions on Fire Emblem representation in SSB4 may change with the advent of the DS remake Fire Emblem: Shin Ankoku Ryuu to Hikari no Ken. I have witnessed that Ike's appearance in Brawl boosted Fire Emblem sales. Another mistake is that the first six Fire Emblem games were marketed exclusively in Japan, and the Fire Emblem franchise was unheard of in the U.S. until Melee.
Then I do not think Smash Bros. was the right series for Fire Emblem fans like me, at least not for fans of Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu. Melee may be my last Super Smash Bros. game. I will still see how the Super Smash Bros. series turns out in the future.
I mean, that's great and all, but don't you care about having fun?
I care somewhat about having fun. I just care about whether something will keep me busy. What darkserenade posted on that page of the thread is only speculation. I was once addicted to original Super Smash Bros. and Melee a long time. The way Brawl turned out and the current speculations about future Super Smash Bros. games have knocked me out of having fun with Super Smash Bros. games, and that has proven that it is not really the right game series for me.
But what does/did make the previous Smash games fun for you?
Fire Emblem has two characters, three in the entire history of the series. Metroid has had 2, possibly 1 if you don't include Zamus. How's that fair when you consider that Metroid is much better known than FE? Sure, Metroid's not that popular in Japan while FE is, but what about Europe? The USA? Most of us didn't even know what FE was until Melee, while any person with even a passing knowledge of game history knew of Metroid.
Oh my god, you're a lunatic. You're going to boycott smash because it's not just the way you like it? Do you know how many people are angry that Zamus got in instead of someone worthwhile like Ridley or DS? Do you know how many people are angry that not a single Zelda character was added? Do you know how angry people are that there are 3 landmasters? Well, at least none of those people boycotted the game. Boycotting a game because you're unsatisfied with the amount of characters from a franchise is petty.
No, Brawl was duel/double layered, wasn't it? And you know what, fine; you want to boycott Smash Bros. games that you don't like, go ahead. I'm sure that Nintendo will almost break down into tears and go out of business because ONE person willingly chose not to buy (their arguably best franchise made) a game out of the MILLIONS of people who bought it.
What the hell are you talking about? FE has A LOT of characters! That's like saying Pokémon has only 5 Pokémon. Let me name any random ten that I can think of: Marth, Ike, Roy (for SSB4!!!!!), Lyn(dis), Nephenee, Sheeda, Sothe, Micaiah, Haar, and Black Knight. Somebody hasn't ever played about FE before...
I'm 90% certain he means in the smash series
When I said FE has only 2, I was talking about SMASH. I also said Metroid had two, and then I said it required Ridley or Dark Samus. I've played a good portion of PoR, so don't patronize me. Seriously, try reading my entire post, and you'll see what I'm actually talking about.
Please. Tell me you aren't playing it becuase you don't own a Wii or know someone who has it. Please.
Then your an idiot. You boycotting it will do nothing. Heck, Smash Boards boycotting it will do nothing. they don't even make a blip on the radar.
I do not own a Wii, but I know someone who has one. He does not have Brawl. I advised him not to buy it, and he has taken my advice. I would rather play Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn.
That is only speculation, and it is only as of today. I find Fire Emblem deserves TWO more, not ONE, more characters.
Again, you cannot project the sales ranking for Fire Emblem. Fire Emblem is new to the U.S. market anyway. It may not remain in the same rank among Nintendo franchises as it was during the Melee era. I am predicting that Fire Emblem will at least beat Star Fox saleswise, and maybe gain ground on Metroid and maybe Zelda.
Objection!
So? Snake is played by people who never played MGS. I'm pretty sure I can say the same thing for a majority of the cast.
It's not that I think you're boycotting, it's just that because you want one character that didn't come in, you're saying how bad the game is. Since facial expressions can't be seen online, you sound kinda ridiculous. I want to know something: If Lyn was in brawl, would you like it?
Holy God, why are you so dense.
Fire Emblem is nothing. 4 characters? That would be placing it above the likes of Kirby, Star Fox, and Donkey Kong (As they are now). It deserved 1 rep, and was lucky that it got 2.
Ah, that would explain it. Also, you're really lame for coercing people not to play a real fun game just because it doesn't have the characters you would rather play as. Unless, like you, your friend does not care about having fun.
?????
