Justblaze647
Smash Lord
Ah, touche...
Low kicks ftw
Low kicks ftw
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
*raises hand* =PSo, it's more nuanced then that, but how many people here actually know enough about fighting to really understand the distinction?
i actually wouuld and have.... ive taken stocks from ksizzle (i was falco )and inui (mk ditto) in tournament and inui was a mm that wayYour going to go offstage to hit MK, lol.
thats ******** and completely unrelated300% is the highest percent you can start the match with using a handicap.
he knows the diddy matchups. he doesnt know the ADHD matchup.lol
Assuming this is true, you'd think he'd know the Diddy matchup.![]()
I'm well aware of the difference between theorycrafting and the actual game. I was around when the term was created, and have played both of the games where it has seen the most legitimate use.Hence the issue between theorycrafting on paper, and applying said assumptions in real life...
It just rarely ever turn out that way.
You're trying to theorycraft off of mechanical precision and not human ability which is impossible, because not even the top 1% of players never get stage spiked/always tech/never mispace. It's simply not safe to go off stage vs MK as a rule unless you're once of like 3 characters and even then you're still risking losing a stock.i actually wouuld and have.... ive taken stocks from ksizzle (i was falco )and inui (mk ditto) in tournament and inui was a mm that way
learn2technoob
Are you sure about that? I just went to your youtube channel, and if this is how you actually play the game, you are quite terrible. Even with MK.I'm well aware of the difference between theorycrafting and the actual game.
No.I'm well aware of the difference between theorycrafting and the actual game.
Somebody cannot be knowledgable about something if they themselves do not excel at it?Are you sure about that? I just went to your youtube channel, and if this is how you actually play the game, you are quite terrible. Even with MK.
No offense...
Enlighten me, then, as to how I've been using it improperly?From reading the posts in this thread, NONE OF YOU have a clue.
And when I say NONE OF YOU, I mean it in ****ing capital letters...
I wasn't saying that u didn't have said training that u have because that is nothing remarkable i wasn't doubting u. If u were saying that u were using it as an example to demonstrate that threatening people is online is dumb then my bad i misread. It sounded to me like another stupid argument of who can beat u who irl....
You realize I was saying exactly that, I was making a point to somebody threatening to punch anybody who planked him in the face.
The point was:
1. IRL, you have no idea who can kick the crap out of you if you try (I was just using myself as an example because it happens to be a specialty of mine).
2. IRL, you'd get kicked out of the tournament.
3. IRL, you'd be eligible to get arrested.
4. IRL, you'd be eligible to get sued.
TL;DR: Threatening bodily harm to people who use strategies you don't like is stupid, cause if you carry it out you're probably in a worse situation then he is. Also, lrn2read.
Oh and lol@having to warn somebody when they attack me, when you attack somebody, you assume all the associated risks.
I'm more of a striker actually, my spacing is amazing so I'm good at avoiding grappling situations until my opponent is ready for a submission of some kind (aka barely conscious).
Also, lol@grappling=sweaty **** punching.
Oh wise Red Halberd, teach us the ways of gaining a clue.No.
From reading the posts in this thread, NONE OF YOU have a clue.
And when I say NONE OF YOU, I mean it in ****ing capital letters...
Half of us should get out of this thread.hey now, that's not fair judging us on this
half of us only troll here <_<
Half of us (not you) should get some sleep rather than trolling 24/7.Half of us should get out of this thread.
the only difference between you and me is that I'm doing it intentionally for my own amusement, you think the discussion in this topic actually affects anything and treat it as srs bizinezz. this topic is completely inconsequential.Half of us should get out of this thread.
^ This post is really from an honest person in troll clothing. Do not believe it.ally is an outlier, top players don't count, dojo would've won if he planked more, pity me because I main ike etc.
His other forms of stalling do not apply to the SBR definition of stalling. We HAVE to establish a rule to enforce the no-stalling rule BEFORE we do anything else in this debate.His ability to stall has everything to do with it. If he can work around any rules we place on him to try and stop this something is seriously wrong about how we go about this.
I have trouble believing that he'd be able to do DMGs style of hardcore planking for a very long span of time with a 20 ledge grab limit (MK specific, applicable only to time out).We've had LGL's, from the fact MK can still planking without fear of it and can work his magic to try stall out games.
Bassem also beat Dojo...ally is an outlier, top players don't count, dojo would've won if he planked more, pity me because I main ike etc.
You, ADHD, and Ally are not outliers because of what you do with your characters, but rather because of how incredibly well you analyze each situation that occurs throughout the match, as well as your ability to essentially read the opponent's mind. The three of you show what a person is capable of, not what the characters are really like.yeah WARIO vs MK in a last hit set from what Affinity told me. Look at how Dojo does vs DMG by comparison - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jozNpZhp9o
i hate the outlier argument, because it shows the current metagame, where the top 4 are MK/Snake Diddy Falco. Ease of use does not matter at top level (it could matter with like, Melee Fox, but definitely not in brawl)
There are many ways to deal with this post.stuff
get at my falconstuff
yes, some people are stupidIsnt that what you as a part of a smash community should be striving for?
flame me please<3There are many ways to deal with this post.
The easy way=flame
Hard way=reason with the troll
Best way=ignore button.
Guess which I chose?
you shouldnt Assume youre going to make a mistake, even if you get ***** initially practice it until you master it. everyone in this community whines everythings to hard, where in like every other fighting game the amount of timing and tech skill required for what we deem to hard to be practical (and in the case of teching game changing) is literally bare essential, not even high level play.You're trying to theorycraft off of mechanical precision and not human ability which is impossible, because not even the top 1% of players never get stage spiked/always tech/never mispace. It's simply not safe to go off stage vs MK as a rule unless you're once of like 3 characters and even then you're still risking losing a stock.
You idiot, we've been over about how you're talking about the SECOND Akuma ban, not the more commonly known one that happened several years prior to the one you keep mentioning.Oh dude Otochun beat a good akuma player at Xmania lets not ban akuma either.
Life is short - BAN AKUMA (1st post updated)
Intro by Wes Truelson one of the finest ST players in the history of the game.
Quote Originally Posted by lftrpllr View Post
It's as simple as this: Akuma does not fit well into this game. The risk/reward with this character is so out of whack with every other character in the game. Sure, some characters can fight him, but no one can go toe to toe with him. Banning him simply keeps the game more interesting on the tournament level. He might not win every tournament, but guaranteed someone (who probably doesn't deserve it) will finish very high in the placing with him on a consistent basis.
sounds like someone else i know........
but theres only one akuma O.oYou idiot, we've been over about how you're talking about the SECOND Akuma ban, not the more commonly known one that happened several years prior to the one you keep mentioning.
Have you seen the pattern here? You're being put on ignore list by everyone. Try to at least be quasi-reasonable.blahblahblah (as usual)
Get to it!I might put ElDominio on ignore hehe
...but theres only one akuma O.o
everyone in your life maybe. i only know of a random person in midwest that doesnt attend tournaments and a sonic main. yeah i care LOL.Have you seen the pattern here? You're being put on ignore list by everyone. Try to at least be quasi-reasonable.
this sounds like a planI might put ElDominio on ignore hehe
2 Sonic mainseveryone in your life maybe. i only know of a random person in midwest that doesnt attend tournaments and a sonic main. yeah i care LOL.
this sounds like a plan
toobad sonic is awful.2 Sonic mains![]()
Or we could take other solutions to the problem.His other forms of stalling do not apply to the SBR definition of stalling. We HAVE to establish a rule to enforce the no-stalling rule BEFORE we do anything else in this debate.
The fact we have to cater to MK, so he doesn't break the game in half is showing that he is a problem in himself.The other forms don't apply and are beatable, right now I am not talking about those, though. The MK specific LGL would be to prevent his unbeatable stalling (which is already against the rulse), not specifically for any other purpose. I have trouble believing that he'd be able to do DMGs style of hardcore planking for a very long span of time with a 20 ledge grab limit (MK specific, applicable only to time out).
Before we even bother talking about his other various ways to time you out, I'd really like to first establish that we NEED an LGL solely because of his stalling that fits the SBR definition.
Do you agree with an LGL?
Or we could ban him and not cluster out rule-set to cater to MK.@other people: Please don't bother responding to these posts mentioning anything at all about scrooging or his beatable planking. The sole purpose of the posts I'm making right now are to establish that we need an LGL before we move on to anything else.
IF YOU DO MENTION SCROOGING or any other form of MK stalling that doesn't apply to the SBR definition of stalling (IE only talk about DMGs hardcore stalling and whether or not it justifies the use of an LGL), I will not reply as that is not at all what I am focusing on right now.
name a tournament viable way other than scrooging or planking for mk to time someone outA LGL would restrict his ability to plank, but it wouldn't stop him from working a time out if he wanted to. Unless you set it incredibly low like you did which has problems with characters taking advantage of this when he place restrictions on him like this.