Bones0
Smash Legend
Idk man...Ken has always held that roy > marth
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Idk man...Ken has always held that roy > marth
silly strongbadI like how Marth apparently struggles with low tiers now.
A certain yellow rat with a party says otherwise. At least according to Ken lol. I'd really like to see PPU (with more experience vs Pikachu)/PP's marth vs Axe.But of course marth has won a national, in fact more nationals probably than any other character between Ken and m2k. He hasn't won any recently but that's more to do with players than characters.
PP's marth just beat m2k's sheik. A guy who just picked up marth as a secondary won marth's hardest match-up against the best sheik in the world. There's nothing stopping marth as a character from succeeding.
Best sheik, debatable. Hardest match-up, most likely. There never was any restriction on marth in the first place. Only the person using him.But of course marth has won a national, in fact more nationals probably than any other character between Ken and m2k. He hasn't won any recently but that's more to do with players than characters.
PP's marth just beat m2k's sheik. A guy who just picked up marth as a secondary won marth's hardest match-up against the best sheik in the world. There's nothing stopping marth as a character from succeeding.
Mew2King having the best Sheik is not up for debate...Best sheik, debatable. Hardest match-up, most likely. There never was any restriction on marth in the first place. Only the person using him.
Somebody gets itanyway, i think this is my list for now
then no one cares.
If that were true then PP would be able to beat M2K with Kirby. He can't. QED.Still can't believe people are using recent top level metagame confrontations as evidence of anything particularly tier or match-up related. It's player vs player interaction, everything else pales in significance to the point it shouldn't be used empirically.
Firstly its not just PP vs M2K, we can also look at Apex for things like M2K marth vs Mango falco (another one of marth's worst matchups) and PP marth vs Armada peach. Anyway yeah you can trivialize any one of these results individually (m2k also used sheik, armada won second set, etc), but all they show is that marth is still at least capable of winning at the highest level, the level that is required to win national tournaments. In his hardest matchups.I dislike when people say stuff like Marth is now a power contender again because PP beat M2k. Makes it seem like PP put on a dominant performance using marth when he really barely scraped out a win. Total game count as 5-3 in M2k's favor (in GF). Yes PP won the tournament but that hardly means marth is a stand alone national tournament winner (which we havent seen since like 2007)
Interestingly enough, I love playing Puff, but the people I play against despise playing the match-up. I find the spacing game of fighting against a Marth or Jiggs pretty cool, don't see why spacies triple shining each other is any more fun.people don't play marth because he is not an exciting character to play, not because he's bad
same reason people don't play puff
Misrepresenting someone's position through hyperbole isn't a valid retort, kiddo.If that were true then PP would be able to beat M2K with Kirby. He can't. QED.
Speak yourself man, the movement aspect of marth's game is one that makes him such a sublime and elegant character.people don't play marth because he is not an exciting character to play, not because he's bad
same reason people don't play puff
Misrepresenting someone's position through hyperbole isn't a valid retort, kiddo.
If everything else was so insignificant as to be empirically worthless, PP should win or at least get close with any character. Say player vs player accounts for 99%. That means there would only be less than 1% difference for PP choosing a terrible character, not enough to make that big of a difference. The lower you put the player vs player percent, the more you abandon your original position and hence admit that it was wrong. The higher you put it, the more obviously false it becomes. Either way, its wrong.It's player vs player interaction, everything else pales in significance to the point it shouldn't be used empirically.
Yeah, there's tons of different tastes in what characters are fun to look at. Friend of mine thinks spacies are boring (especially Falco and his super long combos that don't actually hurt more than the short and sweet CF stuff ).Speak yourself man, the movement aspect of marth's game is one that makes him such a sublime and elegant character.
2 posts above you my manSpeak yourself man, the movement aspect of marth's game is one that makes him such a sublime and elegant character.
I dislike when people say stuff like Marth is now a power contender again because PP beat M2k. Makes it seem like PP put on a dominant performance using marth when he really barely scraped out a win. Total game count as 5-3 in M2k's favor (in GF). Yes PP won the tournament but that hardly means marth is a stand alone national tournament winner (which we havent seen since like 2007)
You will be a scrub till you visit your first tourney and get beaten by tons of peopleThe only TV's that are available for me at college are the lcd ones...
When I start practicing tech skill this summer on a crt, will I be scrub?
EDIT: Does Game Mode actually do anything?
Game mode bypasses most of the image processing a LCD TV does to give you the best image quality. Which results in pixels on your tv refreshing ever 2 milliseconds or so. Still, CRT TVs do that in less that 1 millisecond.The only TV's that are available for me at college are the lcd ones...
When I start practicing tech skill this summer on a crt, will I be scrub?
EDIT: Does Game Mode actually do anything?
The lag is disgusting on LCDs, it's like playing Brawl online quite literally. You'd need plasma tvs or flat screen TVs, those work fine but not LCDs.Game mode bypasses most of the image processing a LCD TV does to give you the best image quality. Which results in pixels on your tv refreshing ever 2 milliseconds or so. Still, CRT TVs do that in less that 1 millisecond.
The difference is trivial. Besides, everyone should be playing on LCDs by now, no? What's the point of going on a CRT when it's basically extinct?
It's because I exist, obviously. =)In all of the recent competitive smash videos I watch, Ganondorfs are essentially nonexistent, while Samus is appearing much more often than before. Is Ganon less viable than Samus now? Why would you put Ganon above Samus, SB? Is the lack prevalent Ganons because there aren't good players representing the character or because he's just not as popular? Ganon's game seems to be a lot more one-dimensional and lacking in defensive options (OoS, recovery, mobility) when compared to Samus, by a huge margin.