In 2 or 3 years people will have figured out what armada is doing right now to be so consistently successful, just like for m2k and mango in the past. One thing I've noticed is his ability to maximize damage output. In a metagame where everyone good has damage output that is as good as his is now, would fox and falco be better or worse?
While were at it, lets be honest with the trends in our current metagame. For the past year or two, we have seen peach go even in her two hardest match-ups, Fox and Marth. We've also seen Sheik go even in her worst match-ups, Fox, Falco and Puff. At the same time we've seen foxes drop off and marth "go even with" (read: lose to) everyone in the top 5. Fox #1 is nostalgic and theoretical all at once, but results don't really show that right now. Maybe Javi will win FC, but until then, no.
[collapse=Content]I think we should base this list off of the average ELO for each character.
ICs - 1320
Fox - 1310
Falco - 1300
Sheik - 1300
DK - 1288
Marth - 1286
Jigglypuff - 1283
Peach - 1280
Falcon - 1277
Roy - 1276
Samus - 1268
Luigi - 1253
Doc - 1246
Link - 1241
Pikachu - 1239
Ganondorf - 1235
Mario - 1227
Zelda - 1211
Yoshi - 1206
Bowser - 1201
G&W - 1193
YL - 1188
Kirby - 1184
Ness - 1184
Pichu -1159
Mewtwo - 1112
Just for comparison's sake, if we choose to rank characters by the highest ELO main, then we get:
Peach - 2155
Puff - 2026
Falco - 1997
Sheik - 1989
ICs - 1909
Fox - 1890
Doc - 1885
Falcon - 1852
Marth - 1807
Pikachu - 1802
Luigi - 1719
Samus - 1711
Ganondorf - 1684
Zelda - 1521
DK - 1485
Link - 1481
Roy - 1473
G&W - 1470
Yoshi - 1396
Mario - 1366
Ness - 1313
Bowser - 1311
YL - 1269
Kirby - 1216
Pichu - 1199
Mewtwo - 1141[/collapse]
I wouldn't mind doing statistics like this if we could qualify some of it. To compensate for how popular certain characters are over others, we should only count players that are over a certain Elo, say the starting Elo (1200).