Life
Smash Hero
No duh? Everyone brings it up. Still not convinced Oli can't hit DK off the ledge BTdubz. Blame RB.
I'd also point out he didn't win the tournament.
I'd also point out he didn't win the tournament.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'd argue that it doesn't really matter even if Olimar can't hit DK off the edge. Just pick a character that can.No duh? Everyone brings it up. Still not convinced Oli can't hit DK off the ledge BTdubz. Blame RB.
I'd also point out he didn't win the tournament.
I agree. We don't tell Ice Climbers to play differently just because Ganondorf can't safely approach Ice Climbers, after all.I'd argue that it doesn't really matter even if Olimar can't hit DK off the edge. Just pick a character that can.
That's a valid concern which is why I said the community would be more than likely keeping the LGL even if MK were banned again.I'm not really concerned about who can and can't get X character off of the ledge. My question is will anyone want to play a game centered around that?
Replace ledges with MK and ask if people want a game centered around him and people will call you a scrub. Those double standards.I'm not really concerned about who can and can't get X character off of the ledge. My question is will anyone want to play a game centered around that?
LOL this is the most circular thing I've ever seenMK isn't a problem with the current rule set, though
LMAO so true. He isn't a problem in MK banned ruleset eitherLOL this is the most circular thing I've ever seen
Compromises are only bad when MK is banned, amiriteYou could also accept the fact that this game - like virtually every game out there - has its flaws and that a compromise has to be made. Banning MK is dumb.
![]()
This is so true.I have to admit, IC dittos are always entertaining and MK dittos are also entertaining if the MKs are good.
Especially when it's Nairo and he loses the stock first and jumps offstage and goes far off the bottom of the screen that you can only see him through the bubble and you just hear MK noises.
Given all the stages and ledge play being cut from the ruleset as a result of his previous dominance, you may be right.MK is the biggest problem in an MK-banned tournament environment.
so is dhalsim and chris Gs morrigan.But they're boring to watch against most other characters
Im running a tournament next month, and because the people voted to ban MK, im adding 2-3 stages to the legal stage list.Given all the stages and ledge play being cut from the ruleset as a result of his previous dominance, you may be right.
Falco has a rich CQC game and several counters.And Falco
**** birds
Melee doesn't......lol just kidding (Im not kidding.) My opinion is that banning would be good for brawl in theory. The URC intended for the ban to breathe some life into brawl by increasing character variety. It just didn't work out that way. Instead of getting timed out by mk's you get CG'ed by D3 and laser camped by the space turkey. Brawls real broken, with or without MK. I really gotta ask though, if your intention is to get competitive and be the best you're gonna pick the top tiers anyway right? Balance is nice, but not vital to developing a deep fighting game.this game - like virtually every game out there - has its flaws
![]()