ONE SIDE:
lmfao okay okay i think now people are taking the ddd hate way too far
he's a
good character. and he def doesn't get ***** by zero suit. come play me at apex.
if you guys are saying ddd is bad just to troll doc king i am in 100% percent support of that, but this is getting kinda out of control and i'm getting the impression most of you haven't ever really played a good ddd.
OTHER SIDE
Someone needs to step up and show the world that King DDD>Zss and Lucario, especially Zss.
Doc King said:
I do agree that someone should improve D3. I've been theorycrafting him like a boss for a while. We just need a D3 salem to show this stuff off.
this is dumb and honestly kind of offensive. there have been three extremely notable ddds in history, all for a pretty decent span of brawl's lifetime, and you're saying none of them have done for the character what salem did in
one tournament?
and doc, excuse me, but
what in the actual ****? you have been advertising your hella-impractical infinites on characters we already beat for MONTHS and MONTHS. there is a reason that every single ddd in existence brushes off your findings, and its because you present them as this revolutionary pivot in the ddd metagame when all you're doing is infiniting peach on a slope. we
beat peach. i have
never lost to a peach and i have absolutely no idea why you spend your days trying to find better ways to beat jigglypuff.
it's jigglypuff, you moron. back-air.
i honestly hope another prodigy ddd comes along before the end of brawl. i would love to see it. but if you think he's going to be winning because of your findings, you're dead wrong, because if he's honestly good, he won't be losing to these characters anyway.