Seevea
Smash Rookie
Ha finally i can officially man sheik AND zelda at the same time!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Just because you know that the 8 frame kill move is coming ever since you hit 95% doesn't make it any weaker.When people start realizing that Fox is rather predictable, I think they wil do better against him.
This post......just wow. Doesn't even deserve a response.Fox...isnt that good.
I mean really, he has such HORRID matchups. Oh they aren't common? BIG DEAL THAT DOESNT ELIMINATE HIM HAVING SUCH HORRID MATCHUPS!
When people start realizing that Fox is rather predictable, I think they wil do better against him. I honestly cant see why MK users are having issues with the character. Lazyness I am sure.
Not really. There is in fact no proof. Nothing changed. Fox still has his bad MUs, they don't suddenly go away because they are uncommon. Heck, in some areas they could be rather common for all we know. You don't get to use "they aren't commonly played" as an argument. His tournament results are still under Wolf's. He hasn't suddenly placed well at several large tournaments like Ike and to a lessor extent ZSS did. There has been no ground breaking new AT.We will see about that. You sound ridiculous.
Tournament results can help, but I don't think they should factor into the list because it would become a never ending change in the tier list better.
Tournament results are important. Of course, they are not the only important factor in tier lists, but they are still very important. If you're ignoring tournament results, you're basing a tier list solely on theorycraft. We aren't playing that game and I wouldnt want a tier list of that.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=284937Ike would still be in low tier if not for one player.
C/D?
C most likely, due to Inui landing him that low in the first place. Though it could also depend on how much Dr.Doom would have raised up Ike by himself. Might have been enough to just get Ike past Lucas, with Bowser dropping below him, into Mid tier. *shrugs* It's unknown.Ike would still be in low tier if not for one player.
C/D?
Not going to touch D3, don't know as much about him, but from what I remember/remember seeing, only Marth out of that list is actually bad for Wario. D3 I've seen as low as 45:55 for a while now. Snake was around the same range, as was Peach IIRC. Not as sure about the last one.Wario(Marth, D3, Snake, Peach)
This.ZSS isn't a bad MU for Fox lol.
I laughed.fox vs mk is even
Um, how does this at all counter the fact hat he is predictable.Just because you know that the 8 frame kill move is coming ever since you hit 95% doesn't make it any weaker.
no, no just NO!Fox is predictable in the same sense that you know that Ike is going to jab you if you're right in front of him. I applaud your knowledge and jab you anyway.
Case Fox's palcement is completely justified by tournament data.Idiocy.
lolPlease explain how no change at all = +5 spots.
oh yeah sorry, it's only fox mains and meta knight mains who believe it's even.I laughed.
No, because the circumstances behind Falco and Fox's Usmash is different.Are you seriously saying you will not be hit by Fox's Usmash because it's predictable? I guess everyone who gets hit by Falco's Usmash is dumb then, since it comes out the same frame. If I am getting it wrong, please say so now. This is me seriously asking if that is what you are saying.
Yeah cause Fox is the king of mixups. *eyeroll*lmao at Fox being predictable.
just like how they said Snake possibly had an advantage right?oh yeah sorry, it's only fox mains and meta knight mains who believe it's even.
It's like everyone thinks they're automatically knowledgeable about Fox because they can make assumptions about matchups and know who the best players of said character is.
Yes, I know, I agree, but none of the matchups have actually been acurrately charted character for character. If we made the tier list based on tournamnet results AND matchups it would be better. It would be like taking an open book test. The BBR could have the matchup cheat sheet with all of the matchups and accurately represented in the current metagame, and then decide the list. Much of the list is theory-crafted like you said earlier.There is also the issue about just how bad the MUs are when it comes to the rest of that post. What would you rather have? 3 35:65 MUs, 2 3:7 MUs, or 1 2:8 MU?
Which Foxes have you played, Nick? Is this opinion more from personal experience?This.
Don't know why everybody keeps saying it is.
He has plenty of mixups.Yeah cause Fox is the king of mixups. *eyeroll*
Smashers are flat out lazy, its why they still dont tech Sonic's Dthrow.
obviously shadowlink is the only one that realizes that fox doesn't have access to as many moves as the rest of the cast do.He has plenty of mixups.
You just think that everytime Fox is above he's going to Dair and his only approach is Dair.
Welcome to an evolving meta game.just like how they said Snake possibly had an advantage right?
And Diddy.
Oh and Falco.
And IC's.
he has been placing better recently.In fact, let us entertain the idea of them being even.
MK is obviously the most heavily played character. At Apex, every screen had an MK.
Let us say Fox is even with MK. Why hasn't Fox been placing better? If he went even with MK, certainly we would see SOME indication of Fox performing better in tournaments, even more so since MK eliminates his bad matchups.
Get butthurt more that not everyone is on the hype train.
Uh, no, don't stick words to suit your argument.He has plenty of mixups.
You just think that everytime Fox is above he's going to Dair and his only approach is Dair.
No. *flicks*shielding is impossible after being hit with a laser?
this is news to me.
I like this, ad hominem.obviously shadowlink is the only one that realizes that fox doesn't have access to as many moves as the rest of the cast do.
It is called...using one's brain.Welcome to an evolving meta game.
things change.
Meanwhile, cause you guys are blind, those same FOx''s you are about SWITCH to avoid his bad matchups.he has been placing better recently.
i'm sure multiple people have said this multiple times.
People fall for it when Sonic pulls off a Dair before it as well. Dair~AD^Yeah, and when you think he's going to Bair....................
he FF ADs and grabs.
Oh look!
A mixup!
^In fact, shall cease arguing about it, l'll wait for 6 months and watch everyone go "**** Fox didn't work out"
Opinion.Which Foxes have you played, Nick? Is this opinion more from personal experience?
Eh we're all scrubs for not going MK XD^
This This This (Yoshi goes up to D tier)
Instead of running off to characters like MK Snake or Diddy give the others a chance (look how Ike turned out) and see if you can place Well enough for top 8 or 4 rather then switching mains just to gain money.
you could probably get out jab before he usmashes (or grabs).No. *flicks*
I said it puts you in a bad situation, not that it was a true combo. It is much like Sonic's Spindash to Bair. SDI allows you to avoid it, but it places you in a poor situation.
Very little is guaranteed in Brawl.
this doesn't deserve a real reply because it's basically just saying the same thing over again.It is called...using one's brain.
Snake has an advantage over MK.
Sl84: No he doesn't.
You and the rest of the community: STFU you know nothing.
Same thing with Diddy.
Same thing with Sonic.
Same thing with Falco.
Same thing with Wario.
Yeah, sorry but no.
TKD has used fox to fight tyrant and other notable MKs and won.Meanwhile, cause you guys are blind, those same FOx''s you are about SWITCH to avoid his bad matchups.
If we are going to blatantly ignore that, I demand everyone be placed in top tier with MK because of the ability to have a secondary.
In fact, shall cease arguing about it, l'll wait for 6 months and watch everyone go "**** Fox didn't work out"
fix'dSonic +2 now plox?
I mean he falls faster than FOx and is just as limted in his landing placement.
I know that Zeton doens't.Meanwhile, cause you guys are blind, those same FOx''s you are about SWITCH to avoid his bad matchups.
DK is actually doing quite well thanks to willThat being said, I don't think anyone around Fox's level in the tier list has been doing substantially better than him either.
TKD has switched several times, DMG can confirm I believe.I know that Zeton doens't.
I only remember TKD going MK when he got CPed to RC or Brinstar.
Nakat? Know he seconds MK, but I don't know if he uses him for bad MU's or not.
Some characters have a greater margin of error when it comes to prediction.you could probably get out jab before he usmashes (or grabs).
not really a bad situation, at all.
of course, you could read/predict the opponent, but so can fox.
Fix'dI have no emthod by which to counter your statement.
TKD has been known to switch as well.TKD has used fox to fight tyrant and other notable MKs and won.
Then lost the rest. AWESOMENAKAT has used fox against holy and won (i think? he won 1-2 matches, at least).
MK doesn't counter a ton of characters.We are talking about MK here, which isn't a counter.
Okay then you have to admit that the +5 rise is not justified. COnsidering DK suffers hard counters as well and look where he is, so obviously something is going wrong here.I am not arguing that fox doesn't have problems with pikachu/sheik, nor is anyone else.
Personally? I'd drop him several spots if we consider no LGL.And while we're at it, pikachu also counters falco, as well as anyone who has a half decent planking game.
guess he should be mid tier eh?
both usmashes are 8 frames, seems pretty equal to me.Some characters have a greater margin of error when it comes to prediction.
Let's not play the whole "everyone is equal" BS when we know they are not.
Ok? what does this have to do with anything? did he switch during his matches with tyrant? no.TKD has been known to switch as well.
Care to explain?
but ... this has nothing to do with anything. >_<Oh and he won, great, I remember the time Malcolm managed to beat m2k.
I remember Sonic users beating notable MK's. Everyone remember when m2k was taken to game 5?
I love selective memory!
Sonic 5-5. Get at me people.
Rocking the same logic as you.
obviously.MK doesn't counter a ton of characters.
In fact, some characters counter others much more harshly than MK does.
When do any mid tiers win tournaments consistently? maybe place consistently, but fox does that just fine.Doesn't change the fact that Fox stil loses.
When Is ee Fox users winning tournaments consistently, I'll be more inclined to agree with you.
Fox is just generally a better character than DK.Okay then you have to admit that the +5 rise is not justified. COnsidering DK suffers hard counters as well and look where he is, so obviously something is going wrong here.
Oh by the way, Dk was considered evenw ith MK for a moment too!
ditto.Personally? I'd drop him several spots if we consider no LGL.
So keep that in mind.
Okay, thanks for the clarification.I beat Holy 2-1 Fox vs MK SPELT. I use MK on bad cp's for Fox stages/death mu's only time I used Fox on a bad stage (Brinstar) was against Inui and I still won.