Seibrik mains Mk and I haven't seen him use D3 in forever. I think D3 has slight advantage. I did not know of those recent sets. How recent?
atomsk and i lost at pound 5. co18 lost at some mlg.
I just think you underrate D3 a lot. Always have lmao.
agreed, maybe
Being able to CG straight into a GR or Dtilt at edge is something most characters can't abuse Snake of. Sure, you have to get past the nades, but it isn't like D3 is incapable of getting through nades. His high priority Bair is something Snake can't really challenge when Snake is in the air. And D3's Back roll and Spotdodge are pretty ****ing good. Snake doesn't kill D3 with Utilt early like most characters. If Snake messes up then that's 50-60% of damage he'll eat. If D3 messes up it isn't as much...
this is assuming snake is, for whatever reason, standing with his back facing the rest of the stage, also probably on FD. when ddd gets a grab, he doesn't get 50-60% unless it's literally from the very edge of fd, and why would snake be pressuring ddd like that anyway? that's dumb.
also i like how our one grab is 50-60 damage guaranteed, but any mistake by us isn't going to get ftilted or grenade setup or anything. ddd gets blown up harder than most characters due to his size and lack of mobility. you know ddd gets tech chased harder than most do, right? we only have one viable option, f-roll, because if we getup attack it hits in front of us first, giving him time to shield it ON REACTION.
I could see...I cannot see...
o word??? so instead of taking my word for it, as someone that plays ddd extensively and has done so for over two years, you're going off your basic gut instinct on two characters, neither of which you play at a high level, and even go as far as to insist upon
other matchups you know little about. got it!
good snakes don't get grabbed and even if they do, it's very hard to get more than just a CG out of it because of his amount of options to get back (go to ledge, use upb to go high immediately, jump back onto stage, whatever).
simply put, you're putting your own "well personally
I THINK" over not only the opinions of me and my peers, but also over
hard, concrete results. saying "snake might lose to ddd" is fine, completely understandable and acceptable, because the matchup is so strenuous for both sides, and the grab certainly is an empowering tool. saying "i have no idea how snake could beat ddd and it is simply impossible because a cg is guaranteed 60% damage and no snakes have ever beaten ddd" is, well, stupid.