Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Fun fact: there's a flavor of Snapple called Peach Mango. I partake of it frequently.I was drinking some tropical juice during breakfast the other day. I looked at the juice label and almost choked: Mango doesn't play Orange Peach!
didn't read much else but i appreciate this comment but also would like to say that falcons suck at this matchup in general, they are doing it wrong, and that doesn't change anything about the matchup just the general knowledge regarding itAs much as I trust Scar's opinion since he's an amazing Falcon, I think he's relating Sheik to other MU's too much. Sheiks will tell you that Foxes are harder than Falcon and Sheik isn't even with Fox so just relating match ups doesn't work.
If Sheik isn't as good against Falcon as Fox or Falco is, then there's nothing saying that Falcon's match up with Fox isn't 70-30 and Sheik's is 65-35, which would still fall under <<, imo.
Lacking an approach isn't match up defining when neither character has an approach. In theory, Falcon should never breach Sheik's defense because he doesn't have a move that does it, while Sheik has plenty of moves that go through Falcon's and the advantage of having a projectile. In practice this doesn't happen and everything you've said is true, but in theory (which is all this sort of MU chart really is) Sheik should not lose to Falcon.
**** no.spacies only >> falcon in theory
it's not too bad in practice
Am I mistaken or have you stated that in every match Fox is either does better or equal to Falco? I think you just have a bias towards Fox, and it's not just you; even if people believe that Falco beats fox in their match up, they still believe that in every other match up Fox does at least equal to Falco. It's ********. Falco does better than Fox against Falcon the because of the broken combos he has on him, and due to the fact that Falco has an easier time camping him because his lasers have hit stun(note in most match-ups Fox would be better at camping because he is faster than Falco, but this fact is rendered void since Falcon has greater mobility than Fox)**** no.
its>>.
and as I said before hax and now after. fox is harder than falco
but not>>>
******scar is bad and his opinion doesnt matter
so truethe real way to play the matchup is to beat her with bairs and nairs into uair strings and kill her at 120 with a bair
I think that foxs combos are much worse in terms that they combo u directly off the stage. And he matches falcon in likes of quickness. He doesnt need to slow falcon down with lasers ^_^Am I mistaken or have you stated that in every match Fox is either does better or equal to Falco? I think you just have a bias towards Fox, and it's not just you; even if people believe that Falco beats fox in their match up, they still believe that in every other match up Fox does at least equal to Falco. It's ********. Falco does better than Fox against Falcon the because of the broken combos he has on him, and due to the fact that Falco has an easier time camping him because his lasers have hit stun(note in most match-ups Fox would be better at camping because he is faster than Falco, but this fact is rendered void since Falcon has greater mobility than Fox)
Link vs Falcon:
Link vs Falcon is completely stupid. Falcon's nair is amazingly safe, hitting through or trading with Link's nair consistently, and trades lead to Falcon landing grabs because he WILL hit the ground first while Link is busy having a jab that takes far too long to come out, a roll that sucks and a very slow jump. Falcon dominates Link's aerials when below him. His uair hits through every one of Link's moves. Projectiles are null and void because the time it takes to throw a boomerang is longer than the time it takes a DDing falcon to grab/nair Link. Knees on the shield are unpunishable due to Link's slow OOS game, same with nairs.
If Link is given space and the time to get projectiles out he can control the pace for as long as he has a bomb in his hands, but after the bomb explodes he'd better be able to combo or pull another because he's just helpless if he tries to pull without cover. Falcon can also combo into the knee from throws against Link, which means Link's fantastic recovery is pretty much worthless. Falcon can also edgeguard the hookshot with ease.
Again, matchup knowledge is extremely important. Falcons who have no idea how to play against Link can get their **** ruined. Falcons who know how to play against Link will laugh and win with relative ease.
Knowledge and application are two different things you silly tran.
So I should listen to MarthSlayeR_99 because he might be a really good critic? Let's not take that chance.I was about to say that TML. Think of some people like critics or something.
who are youhax you ******* you agreed w/ me on everything u prob didn't read my post
cocky *** east coast falcons...
Join Date: Jul 2009Wow this thread is so ****ing LOL.
****'s so dumb, and until I can get better at melee and not just theorycraft, I'll just lurk.