Powered-By-Sex
Smash Apprentice
I've been playing Melee for roughly 3 yrs now and have made Marth my main. No matter if it's tournament or friendly, I never sandbag unless I'm too tired to care.
There's certain people I play with that have been complaining about chaingrabs with Marth. They play spacies so I feel inclined to chaingrab them. I get the typical comment like "your Marth is so gay, etc.." a few of my friends though have no problem with the chaingrab as they see that if you're playing to win, do whatever it takes.
I argue that Fox vs. Marth is even and that Falco vs. Marth is in favor against Falco, but it is overall not that bad, but it doesn't matter. I just get the "your Marth is gay, ****ing chaingrabs/gimps"
I really don't know how to argue my case. I feel that the chaingrabs make it fair. The way I see it is:
against Fox: a shine can kill you at way lower %'s compared to chaingrabs and he's a lot faster too than Marth, can't shieldgrab L-cancelled aerials if shined out of.
against Falco: same as Fox, cept you have lasers that are hard to get by, and a spike that can kill you at relatively low %'s potentially.
I feel that the grabs and gimps are necessary for the matchup.
So in closing, umm... how can I argue my case, or should I just play the people that don't care about the grabs (they're actually better players)?
There's certain people I play with that have been complaining about chaingrabs with Marth. They play spacies so I feel inclined to chaingrab them. I get the typical comment like "your Marth is so gay, etc.." a few of my friends though have no problem with the chaingrab as they see that if you're playing to win, do whatever it takes.
I argue that Fox vs. Marth is even and that Falco vs. Marth is in favor against Falco, but it is overall not that bad, but it doesn't matter. I just get the "your Marth is gay, ****ing chaingrabs/gimps"
I really don't know how to argue my case. I feel that the chaingrabs make it fair. The way I see it is:
against Fox: a shine can kill you at way lower %'s compared to chaingrabs and he's a lot faster too than Marth, can't shieldgrab L-cancelled aerials if shined out of.
against Falco: same as Fox, cept you have lasers that are hard to get by, and a spike that can kill you at relatively low %'s potentially.
I feel that the grabs and gimps are necessary for the matchup.
So in closing, umm... how can I argue my case, or should I just play the people that don't care about the grabs (they're actually better players)?