theeboredone
Smash Legend
I mean, only reason San got in was cause he's black. Minority ftw.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I know. Thing is, where else should I apply? I have several others in mind, but still not enough. I better start looking. It's already halfway through summer.Anyway. Jam. I suggest applying to more than just Ivy League, bro. Some of those schools basically require you to know the dean to get in. I'm not at all saying you can't get in. I'm just saying you need some more options.
(I only applied to one university, but that's because I was pretty much guaranteed accepted.)
Well, aren't you lucky?Greetings Ike mains,
I am trying to improve and learn MUs by playing people with the most experience, the people who main that character.
Do you have a wifi thread or xat chat where I can find matches?
Feel free to leave visitor messages concerning wifi for me.
Currently I have little experience vs Ike and suck. Thankyou for your time.
Nah, it has nothing to do with the countries. It's the left wing nuts being in charge of countries that corrupts things. Obama is left wing. Harper is right wing. The US is sinking farther into debt through stupid ideas like changing the health care system to one that doesn't work and has lots of problems in every country where it's used, Canada is gaining money and finally got out of the left wing nut's created debt last year.I pissed off Niddo and he gave me an annoying lecture on how this country is corrupt and Canada is a true escape from reality.
Because Bored is awesome, he is able to prevent such stabbing by reversing time and moving out of the way at the last second. Yes, while not Persian, being in South Asia and having some roots to the Persian Empire grants him the hook up. All is well now, and a simple Slaps substitution was used in his place to take the stabbing.*stabs bored with a rusty pen knife*
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com...bt As Percent Of GDP&state=US&color=c&local=sNah, it has nothing to do with the countries. It's the left wing nuts being in charge of countries that corrupts things. Obama is left wing. Harper is right wing. The US is sinking farther into debt through stupid ideas like changing the health care system to one that doesn't work and has lots of problems in every country where it's used, Canada is gaining money and finally got out of the left wing nut's created debt last year.
1) I'm not American. Just double checking that that point has been made clear.Sorry about this, I'm in a bad mood.
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com...bt As Percent Of GDP&state=US&color=c&local=s
Health reform was first started by Teddy Roosevelt, Republican. Richard Nixon also tried. It’s not just left wing who have pushed a health care reform. Left wing ‘nuts’ didn’t make the deficit sky rocket after 2001 either. Since the reform passed the deficit is predicted to drop.
And cut the partisan BS. America is a free country built on a foundation of different beliefs working together. If you don’t like it, it’s your right to complain freely. Just like it’s my right to say get your facts strait. Do you want to complain blindly or fix the situation?
Lol, sorry you sounded like an American. Um, ...why do you care?4) Both sides are responsible for the deficit. Obama had a chance to lower it however, but has only raised it.
5) Fun fact: depending on how you look at things, either Clinton or Carter is responsible for the US market dropping, and thus the world recession.
I care because I'm currently living in the US. My dad is in the Canadian Air Force, got posted to the US in an exchange posting.Lol, sorry you sounded like an American. Um, ...why do you care?
A big thing I hear about the reform is it will be like other country's systems. That's not true. While the health system is government regulated, it remains a competition driven industry. Basically why Clinton's version failed was it was government run. As with any capitalist practices competition is the main factor in keeping costs down. The regulation is intended to weed out $948 billion of unnecessary spending. Rule-out tests cost a lot, physicians aren’t networked and people often have to wait until an injury or illness is emergency room critical to be treated. The situation was going to collapse on it’s self in a short time anyway. Insurance premiums were increasing faster than wages: Between 1999 and 2008, average annual family premiums more than doubled, rising from $5,791 to $12,680, an increase of 119 percent. Without health reform, average family premiums are projected to increase from $13,100 in 2009 to more than $22,000 by 2019.
And the number of uninsured Americans was raising, 47 million and counting. I can say from family experience, an ambulance ride, no additional treatment, alone is easily $1,400. 3 nights in a hospital, not including treatment of any kind was $5,300. The job market sucks, there’s 47 million people who are going to be paying off bills from one night for the rest of their lives. The system needed reworking. According to the World Health organization:
“The U.S. health system spends a higher portion of its gross domestic product than any other country but ranks 37 out of 191 countries according to its performance, the report finds.”
That’s a failing system.
Spending money is not uncommon when dealing with a depression. World War 2 really helped the American economy (sorry Europe, we got the ‘better end’ of that war, economically). Since Iraq hasn’t had that affect for reasons that aren’t part of this discussion, Healthcare is designed to stimulate the economy by expanding Medicare, Medicaid, and government funded organizations, increase information technology and networking and make the system as efficient as possible. This involves creating jobs by hiring doctors. Insurance companies can’t take advantage of Americans with extra charges, in that sense they’ll loose money. Any cancelation of coverage, firing of personal is solely the decision of the insurance company. And Americans involved will always have options to be insured. People are protected by the patient’s bill of rights:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/patientsbillofrights/
Fun fact: Clinton had a surplus of $236.24 billion when he left office and Bush took over. Bush created a deficit of $412.73 billion by 2004. A large factor was Wall Street corruption with companies like Enron around 2001. I don’t agree with the bailout strategy but Obama has not raised the deficit. It sucked now it sucks slightly less. Both sides were responsible because they didn’t want to accept reality and would rather fight with each other than deal with it. Ultimately the inaction of the people allowed the depression.
“The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those who look at it without doing anything”
-Albert Einstein
-------------------
I am enjoying this debate, I like a good debate, so don’t get me wrong I’m not angry or anything, just passionate. But the Ike social thread might not be the best place...
Sorry Ike mains.
Mind if I pop in? Just going to drop some (hopefully logical) counter-arguments so that you can review and strengthen your original arguments.I care because I'm currently living in the US. My dad is in the Canadian Air Force, got posted to the US in an exchange posting.
1) Oh, I agree that the health care system needs/needed reworking. However, this is the wrong way to do it. But it is a lot like other systems: government involvement. If they are involved, thing will go south. Obviously, they aren't spending a whole lot of money so they can just watch what is happening: they are getting involved to some extent. A much better system would be to have a combination style healthcare. On the one hand, you have hospitals that act exactly like they are now: with people paying a lot, to get good health care. On the other, you have hospitals with lots of government involvement, which costs less, but has longer wait times, ect. The people who can afford a higher level of health care get theirs, the people who can't afford it get theres.
2) Bush wasn't the best Pres. by any means, but he got a lot of stuff just dropped on his plate. That Enron thing would have started happening before he was the President. And then you have 9/11, with the US people wanting those responsible brought to justice. He was also the lessor of two evils in both elections. I'd hate to see how much money Al Gore would have wasted on "Green" projects, or protecting the environment by flying around in his private jet to discuss the issues. Obama has had some things just dropped on his plate as well, but he's not handling them that well either. Bailouts work in theory, but you can never tell what people are going to do with the money. I also don't believe the health care sector is the right place to look for making money.
And I would say that the Iraq war is making some amount of money, or at least helping the economy. It's basically impossible not to make money in a war, as long as it's not on your turf. All of that stuff being sent over needs to be built; everything from bullets, vests, guns, tanks, food for the soldiers, ect. That stuff is being built in the US, for US soldiers. Thus, Americans are making the stuff, and have jobs. They in turn have money to spend, ect. However, war has changed since WW2, and is a lot more hunting then fighting, thus not making as much off of it.
Yays political debates!
Needs moar items obv.I've had one of those feelings before. I went through one whole class thinking that I was going to fail it, but I ended up acing all the tests and the final. I felt good.
Anyway, best Falco ever? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coSaJ_IZW-Q
I love it when people do this and don't mention what they're thinking.I've been thinking of a number of different things while I was playing today though.