Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yet unfortunately, certain low tiers are a lot more viable than Ganondorf still.So... Luke's rules look fun -- and it finds ways to give good chars like MK and bad chars like Dorf more of an equal purpose in tournaments.
oli is arguably the worst. you forgot marth and wario.Lol snake barely has any you noob.
Like oli(barely),falco,mk,d3? That's not 6
that says more about your di than anything about snake.the fact that snake can turn a match around in a matter of 2-3 ftilts or a few tech chases barely makes anything 'bad' for snake
snake also has arguably the best mu with mk, too, which helps.If MK wasn't there, the characters that are actually deemed 'bad' (40:60) matchups for Snake would actually be encountered more often. Snake does so well because Metaknight counters Snakes bad matchups.
EDIT: Same can arguably be said for Diddy actually.
I mostly meant hes not that much better in regard to the matchup of the characters mentioned (falco, snake diddy).James mk is so much better than every char so we can say that.
And yeah 55-45 barely bad. +the fact that snake can turn a match around in a matter of 2-3 ftilts or a few tech chases barely makes anything 'bad' for snake
Those seem a bit harsh imo though understandable.as for snakes bad matchups
olimar 70:30 (this one has been argued to be less then that, even as low as 55:45, but either way its still a rather bad matchup)
d3 65:35 (1 grab should = 1 stock)
marth 55:45
falco 55:45
mk 55:45 (on most stages, otherwise 50:50 imo)
Come to SA, the falcos here are raddlol ZSS winning a tourney
all it takes is one Falco to ruin that dream![]()