Its speculation, these were all heard names. Does that make them valid? No. Does it make them worth talking about? Yes.
We know 5 out of 7 were at least correct with their choice in character (6 if Mondo Mega is to be believed).
The names were all things heard from sources Vergeben at least considered mentionable. I fail to see why he would mention it in the first place if they weren’t worth talking about.
You seem to think I’ve tossed all caution to the wind in favor of blindly praying that a game I haven’t played gets a spirit event. I haven’t.
I’m speculating based on decently feasible information.
Listen, you need to separate all the names on that list from each other, because they all came from separate people. Vergeben just compiled them based on their company.
The validity of one doesn't help the validity of another, because they are
seven different claims.
You can't look at it as "the list" being true or false. You have to look at each one individually. The list is just a tool to keep order of what Vergeben heard from disparate mouths. It's not the same person providing all the info, like Gematsu or something.
And, tangentially, most of it
isn't true. The claim was Geno would be a character. He's not. The claim was Slime would be a character. It's not. The claim was Sora would be a character. He's not. To have the default assumption be that they knew about intention and scrapped plans is giving them the benefit of the doubt that 99% of leakers don't deserve. If a random person said Sora was going to be playable, we wouldn't assume they knew about the talks that didn't materialize. We would assume, almost definitely correctly so, that they were just making it up.
Why do these people, these anonymous nameless people that, unlike his other claims, Vergeben was not confidant enough to endorse, get the benefit of the doubt? Because they were lucky enough to be listed alongside a character that got in, on a compendium of claims? That makes no sense. That's letting the credibility of one claim bleed into half a dozen others that don't deserve it. Least of which, frankly, is Crono.
And that's not an indictment of the character. And that's not a criticism of just talking about him. Feel free. But you guys weren't just talking, you were conflating one credible source with other less credible ones, with those who were just associated by proximity.
Also, I don’t feel like I need to dig too deep into your Capcom list considering there are no sources attached (credible or otherwise) and that most characters already have a role on it.
Zero and Ken were claimed by Vergeben at one point or another, Chun Li has the Chun Leak, Monster Hunter was on one of those Japanese leaks that wouldn't die, Dante was claimed by the guy who had correct DMC info, and Jill was rumoured by the lady who first outed Banjo. I didn't just pull 6/7 having been subject to notable claims out of my butt.
And btw, despite not being credible, that's better sourcing than you'll get from the Seven Squares list, which is just Verg saying "somebody told me".
And most of those characters already having a role is
exactly my point. Those were the biggest Capcom characters from the same period Vergeben was accruing his claims, and all but Dante have or will wind up with roles. That's my point. When the biggest characters from a company obtain roles in Smash, it doesn't validate every claim that had them, because Smash takes from the top, making that the expectation anyway, fuelling false claims.