Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I lol'd.Changed my mind. You are expelled once again from the thread.
Hippies.Could everybody please post their views on environmentalism in general?
We need you to play it whenever someone uses BangWhy is that so funny?
It shouldn't be yet it is...
oh well time for a new siggy...
Also trying to learn Bang's Theme on guitar.
****s going to be ****** once I get it down!
If you can blow a pinwheel, you're using wind power. If you make a pinwheel move by running water over it, that's hydroelectric power. If the sun warms a surface- solar power. If you locate and mine materials out of the ground, transport them safely, burn (or split atoms for nuclear) them to make steam, and the steam spins the pinwheel, then regulate greenhouse gas emotions, nuclear materials with 4.5 billion year half-lives, etc, and account for cost increases of controlled commodities- (provided there are no accidents) you have non-renewable energy.Could everybody please post their views on environmentalism in general?
Crabbapples too.Throwing trash at squirrels is fun.
and by that Spelt means just him.a lot of people are saying tager is broken in CS2
welcome to all liberal schools.I didn't need it explained to me lol
I just want to know everybody's views on it. And this point, and I completely blame college, I'm a strong believer in deep ecology.
Somewhat correct, both are ridiculously unachievable. You could also in theory move people to other planets or to live in space.I believe that the problem we've created can only be solved by a radical technological fix or a complete localization of communities.
No it isn't. There isn't anywhere near enough livable space on the earth.The second one is ridiculously doable...
lolif everybody cooperated...
Pretty much this.So that's not too likely.
Driving theme of psychology. Man will always seek to better himself.We are making greener technologies everyday, but the production of such technologies only adds to the problem.
Pretty much sums up my thoughts on the issue. Besides, until people start putting money into bio-batteries (which are pretty far advanced) clean energy is a long way off.It's not about new ways of recycling or conserving, but a radical reduction in waste which can't be done with the current technology available, at least for now.
So half the japanese pros that showed up to the loketest are noobs then? :/A lot of people are noobs then
Jabs are godly in Blazblue http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fz4S7j0zJU
No, this is where you're wrong. There are hundreds of thousands of viable ways to cut down on environmental waste, including, but not limited to:Have you taken any environmental sciences? I just found it weird when you used the term "somewhat correct" on the foundation of current environmental problem solving. It is, in fact, completely correct that those are the two options.
Telling people to give up technology is like asking someone to chop off their right arm.I don't know why you keep bringing up space...that's not a real option. And the other options you mentioned make people do things. On average, people aren't willing to put out much change even if they're environmentally conscious. This is why the technological fix, though unlikely, is the only possible option. And yeah, there are thousands of ways to help, but I'm not talking small contributions.
Like...? Example plzI wasn't saying to give up technology. I was talking about new, green inventions.
This x 2You can actually invent things to be any color. They just need to not pollute much, really.
yes, can you guys post your team screen names so we can just add each other?colorado people and new mexico people should play some lol together =o
nice sivir mikezor my poor throbbing butthole
Teehee.So half the japanese pros that showed up to the loketest are noobs then? :/
Spin a turbine and the rest is the same for most energies.Pretty much sums up my thoughts on the issue. Besides, until people start putting money into bio-batteries (which are pretty far advanced) clean energy is a long way off.
^No, this is where you're wrong. There are hundreds of thousands of viable ways to cut down on environmental waste, including, but not limited to:
1) Reduction of mass production of food and other textile industries
2) Decrease in consumption of textile goods
3) Increase of rural life (which you mentioned)
4) Moving of various industries to space /another planet
5) PEOPLE STOP BEING ********.
You're too pessimistic about ^this. Keep in mind people were throwing trash out of their cars before Lady Bird Jonson's 'beautifying America'. Now recycling's a law, and in many places composting too. And stop making me act like an optimist, I feel dirty.On average, people aren't willing to put out much change even if they're environmentally conscious. This is why the technological fix, though unlikely, is the only possible option. And yeah, there are thousands of ways to help, but I'm not talking small contributions.
^People don't like paying $4.00 a gallon for gas either. Why tell people to give up technology anyway?Telling people to give up technology is like asking someone to chop off their right arm.
Unfortunately for us, we live in a society where technology is REQUIRED for the daily maintaining of our lives. No matter how much you want to admit that, there's no way to mass produce the amount of food and even the amount of transportation necessary to convert to a technologically hindered society.
Agree withSpace is an extremely viable option, my dad works for Lockheed Martin, if the government wouldinstead of constantly starving many of the various programs to aid the environment in money.ACTUALLY fund something
Also just throwing this out there - people in America can't even care about their health, and you expect them to even consider the environment?