Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You never know... other great players have had that misconception...i really doubt ally was one of those people.
if not, that's kind of sad...
shhhhhhhhhhh don't encourage it.He also had the misguided notion that you dont need to use tornado.
Now you know why I love the Midwest.Those results look pretty hot if you ignore the Meta Knights completely. Diversity. Delicious diversity.
it's true, his MK is mighty gayI used MK vs Coney this weekend, much easier... than using Snake and no I didn't drop him, I'm getting ready for VC7 that's all. and FALCON YES! MK is lololol
Now you know why I love the Midwest.
Fixed, did not know.I don't know why some of you do this, but venue fee should NOT be included in entry fee.
Very good point.Have there ever been problems regarding the rules of tournaments that have had their results posted in here because they differ from the SBR's ruleset by "too much"? I mean... how far can they differ for them to be considered legitimate in here? For example, a DK winning a tournament because D3's infinite is banned.
I'm interested in rules geared against "stalling", specifically LGLs.
Congrats on 1sts $13!02/24/10
Ole Miss Student Union, Oxford, MS
http://allisbrawl.com/edittournament.aspx?id=8973&t=0
13 Entrants
2$
1st Sanga -- Marth/Ike/Link/Fox
2nd Metro Knight -- Link
3rd Sieth -- Ganon/Toon Link/Jiggly Puff
4th Chase -- Ike
5th PAJ -- Random
6th Gram -- Bowser/Lucario
7th Cook --Kirby/Lucario
8th SEMA --Ike/Link
Meta Knight was not banned. Only one person had the desire to play him and was not nearly as good as the people who spite him. He got pretty unlucky in the bouts.
My current stance isHave there ever been problems regarding the rules of tournaments that have had their results posted in here because they differ from the SBR's ruleset by "too much"? I mean... how far can they differ for them to be considered legitimate in here? For example, a DK winning a tournament because D3's infinite is banned.
I'm interested in rules geared against "stalling", specifically LGLs.
Sounds logical and reasonable, though I do hope the BBR will make a ruling on at least LGLs.My current stance is
if the BBR has made a statement regarding the ruling (IDC, Meta Knight), then it is "too different." Currently that means Dedede's infinite being banned and LGLs are still entered into my database, but that may change in the near future...!
I will not, however, retroactively remove tournaments as a result of the BBR's announcements. That means that, yes, Meta Knight will remain on the list even if he got banned, until 6 months pass and all tournaments with him fall off my threshold (though he will very visibly drop in rank with zero representation).
That's the first time I've seen Ike and Link dominate a tournament. Admittedly, a rather tiny tournament, but still. O_o02/24/10
Ole Miss Student Union, Oxford, MS
http://allisbrawl.com/edittournament.aspx?id=8973&t=0
13 Entrants
2$
1st Sanga -- Marth/Ike/Link/Fox
2nd Metro Knight -- Link
3rd Sieth -- Ganon/Toon Link/Jiggly Puff
4th Chase -- Ike
5th PAJ -- Random
6th Gram -- Bowser/Lucario
7th Cook --Kirby/Lucario
8th SEMA --Ike/Link
Eh? No. That's more of a reference to me giving someone 24 minutes of pain.
It would only be 16 minutes for me....
aaaaahhahahahahahahahahahaaaI generally kill myself at the end of my opponent's CP in these situations so that I get another game by default.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=2670481: Kismet ($96.00)
2: TheReflexWonder ($48.00)/
3: Billy ($16.00):shiek:/
4: Benaji
5: Fullmetal
5: Eli/
7: AtlHero/
7: Skaterbaj/
1: Ally ($452.00)
2: ADHD ($282.50)
3: Mew2King ($169.50)
4: DEHF ($113.00)
5: Shadow ($45.20)
5: NinjaLink ($45.20)
7: Atomsk ($11.30)
7: MintyFlesh ($11.30)
9: San:ouch: